×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Comanche, TX Criminal Defense Law Firms & Lawyers

6 Results have been found for criminal defense attorneys in Comanche, Texas, belonging to 4 different law firms. Find trusted legal representation by reading our detailed profiles, peer endorsements, and client reviews. Below you will find Comanche law firms that provide criminal defense services. To see attorneys, use the tab below.
Filter by
Law Firms Lawyers
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Comanche Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Comanche Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Comanche Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Hoover Rogers Law, LLP

4.9
53 Reviews

  • Serving Comanche, TX and Comanche County, Texas

  • Law Firm with 2 lawyers2 awards

  • The Hoover Rogers Law, LLP legal team is dedicated to helping individuals and families with personal injury and motor vehicle injury accidents and estate planning matters. Trust... Read More

  • Criminal Law LawyersPersonal Injury, Motor Vehicle Accidents, and 31 more

  • Free Consultation

  • Offers Video

Benjamin Hoover
Criminal Law Lawyer
Compare with other firms

John E. Gleaton

  • 106 N. Austin St., Comanche, TX 76442

Woodley & Dudley

  • 306 N. Austin, Comanche, TX 76442

Lawyers At This Firm
ADVERTISEMENT

Christopher S. Till

  • 301 W. Central Ave., Comanche, TX 76442

Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

Looking for Criminal Law Lawyers in Comanche?

Criminal defense lawyers represent individuals accused of committing crimes, ranging from minor offenses to serious felonies. They investigate the case, challenge evidence presented by the prosecution, negotiate plea bargains, and defend the client in court. Their primary duty is to protect the accused's constitutional rights and ensure a fair legal process.

About our Criminal Defense Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
69 %

10 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.7

43 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Commonly Asked Criminal Law Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Can i present new evidence 20 years after conviction?

Richard Keith Oliver
Answered by attorney Richard Keith Oliver (Unclaimed Profile)
Criminal Law lawyer at The Law Office of Rick Oliver
It depends. If you have not previously filed a writ of habeas corpus, there is at least a chance you can pursue one alleging newly discovered evidence. It's more complicated than that, though. It's a long and expensive process to do it correctly. But, if you have "new" evidence, it is at least worth sitting down with a writ lawyer to discuss it.
It depends. If you have not previously filed a writ of habeas corpus, there is at least a chance you can pursue one alleging newly discovered evidence. It's more complicated than that, though. It's a long and expensive process to do it correctly. But, if you have "new" evidence, it is at least worth sitting down with a writ lawyer to discuss it.
Read More Read Less

Is it legal if I was I was questioned as well and never advised of my Miranda rights?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Francis John Cowhig (Unclaimed Profile)
Criminal Law lawyer at Francis John Cowhig
Although an officer should read you your Miranda rights when you are arrested, it is not absolutely necessary as long as you are not questioned about the crime for which you were arrested or were detained during the questioning. Miranda only acts to suppress any statements you gave the police after you are arrested or detained. It does not invalidate an arrest.
Although an officer should read you your Miranda rights when you are arrested, it is not absolutely necessary as long as you are not questioned about the crime for which you were arrested or were detained during the questioning. Miranda only acts to suppress any statements you gave the police after you are arrested or detained. It does not invalidate an arrest.
Read More Read Less

Can I continue to pursue a civil case if the DA threw it out due to small inconsistencies in the formal statement?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Joan M. Durkin (Unclaimed Profile)
Criminal Law lawyer at Durkin & Graham, P.C.
The burden of proof in a civil case is lower than in a criminal case so it is possible to do what you want, assuming that the civil suit was brought timely.
The burden of proof in a civil case is lower than in a criminal case so it is possible to do what you want, assuming that the civil suit was brought timely.
Read More Read Less

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions