Founded
in 1974, Evans & Mullinix, P.A. assists with numerous legal
challenges, including Trusts and Estates issues. From our office in Shawnee, Kansas, the firm's attorneys deliver exceptional counsel and service to clients in Kansas and Missouri.
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 6 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.2 or higher.
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
About Awards
Client Champion Awards
Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity
and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service.
Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.
At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.
At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.
Evans & Mullinix, P.A. got this award in 2021
At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale Peer Awards
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious
Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Evans & Mullinix, P.A. got this award in 2021
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Avvo Awards
Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A,
publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.
Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.
Colin was great from the beginning. He was positive and ready to help us right from the start. Making the hard decision to go bankrupt was not easy. Colin you made it go as good as it could have for our situation. But you never gave up on us. Thank you for being a great person and lawyer.
Mr. Schapker provided clarity & positive direction in a business legal contract dispute. David’s legal acumen and assertiveness during our legal process, gave our business and family confidence & comfort during a stressful time. Absolutely would recommend.
Simple: He is the best! He initially responded to our call while on vacation. He agreed to take our case the same day providing no conflict of interest. Our case involved a dispute with our HOA and he provided the expertise we needed to prevail.
Colin represented me in Bankruptcy court, plus other law problems I did not expect along with my sister's death & probate court with my parents home. He was always informative, knowledgeable, and supportive. He was there in court with me, more than once and Yes, I was "dumb" when it came to the law in many areas. A few years later, I still am thankful he handled my case. M Brown
Excellent lawyer, very knowledgeable, great personality, was extremely caring and helpful in handling our legal need, took the time to answer all of our questions and got the job done very quickly.
Thanks for all your help. Everyone was exceptional. We have already recommended your services to a friend of ours who requires an attorney. Keepup the good work
David was great. He was timely to respond, thorough, easy to talk to, and respected our time by anticipating needs and having things prepared. It was a good experience.
We're incredibly thankful for all the learnings you gave us, in addition to the end deliverable. Thanks so much for helping us prepare for our family and our kids.
Very good experience from how nice and helpful staff was to how David listened to exactly what we wanted. David has suggestions to help but didn’t feel like he was trying sell us extra services. I have recommended David to co worker too.
Reviews
These client and peer reviews are from the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network.
Representative Clients: Al Muehlberger Concrete and Construction, Inc.; Board of Public Utilities; Community Savings Bank; Hudson Oil; M&I Bank; Nebraska Furniture Mart; Premier Bank; Steve's Shoes, Inc.; Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, KS; Yellow Cab.
Representative Clients: Al Muehlberger Concrete and Construction, Inc.; American Carriers, Inc.; Board of Public Utilities; Commercial Claims, Inc.; Community Savings Bank; Elite Financial Corporation; Farm Credit Services; Hudson Oil; ICOP Digital; Leavenworth County Board of Realtors; M&I Bank; Mutual Savings Association; Nebraska Furniture Mart; Net Standards, Inc.; Porter Funeral Homes; Premier Bank; Steve's Shoes, Inc.; Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, KS; Wyandotte Credit Union; Yellow Cab.
Pro Bono Services
We consider pro bono representation a professional responsibility and a community obligation of the firm.
Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.
The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.
Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page
Martindale Peer Reviews
Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.
What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*
• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.
Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.
Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.