×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
David Jonathan Cohen

David Jonathan Cohen

Not yet reviewed

300 Montgomery Street, Suite 660, San Francisco, CA 94104

Criminal Law, Criminal Appeals, Criminal Conspiracy and 14 more

About David Jonathan Cohen

David Jonathan Cohen is a lawyer practicing criminal law, criminal appeals, criminal conspiracy and 14 other areas of law. David received a B.A. degree from Amherst College in 1983, and has been licensed for 39 years. David practices at Bay Area Criminal Lawyers, PC in San Francisco, CA.

Reviews for David

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law 1
    • Federal Criminal Law
  • Securities 1
    • Securities Fraud
  • White Collar Crime
  • Other 13
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Criminal Conspiracy
    • Computer Crimes
    • Extradition
    • Fraud
    • Grand Jury Practice
    • Habeas Corpus
    • Mail Fraud
    • Narcotics Offenses
    • Violent Crime
    • Wiretaps
    • Wire Fraud
    • Criminal Defense

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    Bay Area Criminal Lawyers, PC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    United States v. Hickey, 367 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2004)
    SEC v. Hickey, 322 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2003)
    United States v. Hardeman, 206 F.3d (9th Cir. 2000), amended, 249 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 2001)
    United States v. Daas, 198 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 1999)
    United States v. Hickey, 185 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 1999)
    United States v. Middleton, 35 F.Supp. 2d 1189 (N.D. Cal. 1999)
    United States v. Hickey, 997 F.Supp. 1206 (N.D. Cal. 1998)
    United States v. James Hern
    ez    , 109 F.3d 1450 (9th Cir. 1997)
    United States v. James Hern
    ez    , 27 F.3d 1403 (9th Cir. 1994)
    In re Extradition of Garcia
    Zamora    , 890 F. Supp. 914 (S.D. Cal. 1994)
    United States v. Arana, 981 F2d 1044 (9th Cir. 1992) (see dissent in companion case United States v. Gonzalez, 981 F.2d 1037, 1038-44 (9th Cir. 1992)
    United States v. Jose Hern
    ez    , 952 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir. 1991)
    United States v. Stout, 936 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1991)
    United States v. Arias-Granados, 923 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1991)
    Sislik v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 58 T.C.M. (CCH) 115 (1989).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1987, New York
    1990, California
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    U.S. Tax Court
    Memberships
    San Francisco County, New York State, Federal and American (Member, Section on Criminal Justice) Bar Associations
    State Bar of California (Member, Section on Criminal Justice)
    National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
    California Attorneys for Criminal Justice
    Criminal Trial Lawyers Association of Northern California.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Chicago
    Class of 1986
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Amherst College
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    cum laude
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Specialist, Criminal Law, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1961
    Tarrytown, New York, March 9, 1961

David Jonathan Cohen

Principal at Bay Area Criminal Lawyers, PC
Not yet reviewed

300 Montgomery Street, Suite 660San Francisco, CA 94104U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Harris Bruce Taback
Pro
Harris Bruce Taback
5.0
29
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

628-333-8047
View Profile
Nors Elwood Davidson
Pro
Nors Elwood Davidson
4.9
154
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

628-333-8039
View Profile
Christopher F. Morales
Pro
Christopher F. Morales
4.8
37
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

415-426-1167
View Profile
Seth P. Chazin
Pro
Seth P. Chazin
4.8
22
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

844-300-3342
View Profile
Saad Sweilem
Pro
Saad Sweilem
5.0
1
Criminal Law lawyer

Free Consultation

844-700-2792
View Profile

Email David Jonathan Cohen

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions