×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

McManis FaulknerPartner
James McManis

James McManis

Not yet reviewed

50 West San Fernando Street, San Jose, CA 95113

Alternative Dispute Resolution, Business Law, Civil Litigation and 13 more

About James McManis

James McManis is a lawyer practicing alternative dispute resolution, business law, civil litigation and 13 other areas of law. James received a B.A. degree from Stanford University in 1964, and has been licensed for 59 years. James practices at McManis Faulkner in San Jose, CA.

James McManis (San Jose, California)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

James McManis got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for James

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Business Law
  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Civil Rights
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Family Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • White Collar Crime
  • Other 5
    • Criminal Defense
    • Employment Law
    • Law Practice Mgmt
    • ADR
    • Appeals

Practice Details

  • Languages
    German
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    McManis Faulkner
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    City of San Jose v. Superior Court (2014) 225 Cal. App. 4th 75
    Ibrahim v. Department of Homel
    Security (9th Cir. 2012) 669 F. 3d 983
    County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court (Feb. 17 2009) 2009 WL 377172
    Ibrahim v. Department of Homel
    Security (9th Cir. 2008) 538 F. 3d 1250
    Sutter's Place v. Superior Court (2008) 161 Cal. App. 4th 1370
    State Board v. Superior Court (2006) 138 Cal. App. 4th 951, 42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 116
    Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (2004) 117 Cal. App. 4th 794, review granted
    Ensoniq Corp. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (1998) 65 Cal. App. 4th 1537
    Zhao v. Wong (1996), 48 Cal.App.4th 1114, 55 Cal.Rptr. 909
    Fenwick & West v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (1996), 43 Cal. App. 4th 1272. 51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 294
    Estate of Wong (1995) 40 Cal. App. 4th 1198, 47 Cal. Rptr. 2d 707
    Stalberg v. Western Title Insurance Company (1994) 27 Cal. App. 4th 925
    32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 750
    Portman v. County of Santa Clara (9th Cir. 1993) 995 F.2d 898
    Wright v. City of Santa Clara (1989) 213 Cal. App. 3d 1503
    262 Cal. Rptr. 395
    Lazzaroni v. Larson
    In re Romo (1987) 190 Cal. App. 3d 279
    235 Cal. Rptr. 377
    People v. Pringle (1984) 151 Cal. App. 3d 854
    199 Cal. Rptr. 27
    People v. Conner (1983) 34 Cal. 3d 141
    666 P.2d 5
    193 Cal. Rptr. 148
    Filmamatic Corporation v. General Electric Company (1980) 1980-1982 Trade Cas. (CCH) P63,417.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1967, California
    United States District Court for the Northern District of California
    United States District Court for the Central District of California
    United States District Court for the Southern District of California
    United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    United States Supreme Court
    Memberships
    Santa Clara County Bar Association (Trustee, Judiciary Committee, ADR Steering Committee, Bench-Bar-Media-Police Committee, President's Blue Ribbon Commission on Diversity)
    State Bar of California (Special Examiner, 1995-1997
    Member, Task Force on Admissions Regulation Reform 2012-2013)
    American Bar Association
    Honorable Society of King's Inns, Ireland (Honorary Bencher, 2012-)
    Bar Fellowship
    American Bar Foundation (ABF); American College of Trial Lawyers (ACTL); Academy of Court Appointed Masters (ACAM); International Academy of Trial Lawyer (IATL); Litigation Counsel of America.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Berkeley
    Class of 1967
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Stanford University
    Class of 1964
    B.A.
    with Distinction

    Stanford University
    Class of 1964
    B.A.
    Phi Beta Kappa

James McManis

Partner at McManis Faulkner
Not yet reviewed

10th Floor, 50 West San Fernando StreetSan Jose, CA 95113U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Christopher D. Hirz
Pro
Christopher D. Hirz
4.9
32
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer

Free Consultation

408-883-6797
View Profile
Dennis W. Del Ponte
Pro
Dennis W. Del Ponte
4.6
15
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer

Free Consultation

408-444-9176
View Profile
John F. Bradley, Jr.
Pro
John F. Bradley, Jr.
4.7
23
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer
408-869-0249
View Profile
Kathleen Kyungmi Dong
Pro
Kathleen Kyungmi Dong
4.3
12
Alternative Dispute Resolution lawyer
669-330-0978
View Profile

Email James McManis

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions