×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Wong FlemingV.P. & Partner
Daniel Chamberlin Fleming

Daniel Chamberlin Fleming

Not yet reviewed

300 East 42nd Street 14th floor, New York, NY 10017 + 3 locations

Employment & Labor, Civil Rights, Commercial Litigation and 7 more

About Daniel Chamberlin Fleming

Daniel Chamberlin Fleming is a lawyer practicing employment & labor, civil rights, commercial litigation and 7 other areas of law. Daniel received a B.A. degree from Villanova University in 1981, and has been licensed for 41 years. Daniel practices at Wong Fleming in New York, NY and 3 others locations.

Daniel Chamberlin Fleming (New York, New York)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Daniel Chamberlin Fleming got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Daniel

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Civil Rights
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Real Estate
  • Other 6
    • Employment & Labor
    • Corporate Asset Recovery
    • Creditors' Rights and Bankruptcy
    • International
    • Products Liability and Mass Tort Litigation
    • Trial, Insurance Defense and Coverage

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    V.P. & Partner
    Firm Name
    Wong Fleming
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Represented a large commercial lender against principals of a defunct business
    its successor company asserting fraudulent conveyances under the UFTA
    successor liability claims.
    Represented a cable television provider in a suit brought by a factoring company seeking to collect payments owed by advertisers to a media advertising agency,
    attained a favorable resolution after asserting cross-claims against media agency's assignee for unlawful conversion of monies due for placement of advertisements under Article 9 of the UCC.
    Represented a large financial services institution in the defense of a pending action involving claims of fraud in the inducement of a vendor contract
    unjust enrichment.
    Represented one of the nation's largest bank-based financial institutions on a multi-million dollar default regarding several Dem
    Floor Plan Line-of-Credit Notes.
    Represented a Fortune 500 financial institution on numerous matters involving defaults on secured
    unsecured lines of credit.
    Represented a national bank-based financial institution on matters involving bankruptcy
    recovery of secured equipment with a seven-figure value.
    Represented a Fortune 500 company for recovery of secured equipment
    machinery.
    Represented a national based financial institution in an action for breach of contract when the answering party failed to secure the renewal of a contract as required by the governing loan documents.
    Represented a Fortune 500 company on numerous matters involving default on loan documents
    recovery under continuing personal guaranties of the answering party.
    Represented a large financial Institution in federal court to recover a multi-million dollar advance used for the operating capital of a large regional bank.
    Represented a Fortune 500 Company in a discovery dispute involving a non-party witness subpoena to limit
    exclude the production of documents relating to confidential trade secrets.
    Represented a large consumer financial institution in the defense of a requirement for reserve account to protect against losses due to a motor vehicle dealership's falsification of consumer loan documents.
    Represented the former owners of a staffing business in a multi-million dollar contract interpretation lawsuit with the successor entity.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2017, California
    Virginia
    1985, District of Columbia
    1985, Maryland
    SDNY, EDNY, DNJ, EDPA, SDIL
    1999, New York
    2016, Ohio
    1997, Pennsylvania
    1986, New Jersey
    Indiana
    Memberships

    Professional Honors, Awards and Activities

    •Rated AV-Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell
    •Member, DRI
    •Member, ABA
    •Member, Board of Directors for Asian Bank, Philadephia, PA
    •Chairman, Audit Committee, for Asian Bank, Philadelphia, PA

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America
    Class of 1984
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Villanova University
    Class of 1981
    B.A.
    and B.A.H.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1959
    Teaneck, New Jersey, November 11, 1959

Daniel Chamberlin Fleming

V.P. & Partner at Wong Fleming
Not yet reviewed

300 East 42nd Street 14th floorNew York, NY 10017U.S.A.

Show on map

300 East 42nd Street 14th floorNew York, NY 10017U.S.A.

Show on map

1500 Market St., 12th Floor, East Tower #1053Philadelphia, PA 19102U.S.A.

Show on map

1050 Connecticut Avenue NWWashington, DC 20036U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Derek Todd Smith
Pro
Derek Todd Smith
4.2
22
Employment Contracts lawyer

Free Consultation

929-578-6512
View Profile
Gerald Jay Resnick
Pro
Gerald Jay Resnick
4.5
9
Employment Contracts lawyer
862-693-4254
View Profile
Hillary Johns
Pro
Hillary Johns
5.0
54
Employment Contracts lawyer

Free Consultation

747-400-1329
View Profile
Daniel S. Braverman, Esq.
Pro
Daniel S. Braverman, Esq.
5.0
146
Employment Contracts lawyer
917-814-0180
View Profile
Louis Pechman
Pro
Louis Pechman
5.0
38
Employment Contracts lawyer
347-718-2642
View Profile

Email Daniel Chamberlin Fleming

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions