×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Mr. David E. Moore

Mr. David E. Moore

Not yet reviewed

110 West Methvin Street, Longview, TX 75601

Criminal Law, White Collar Crime, Drugs and Narcotics and 1 more

About Mr. David E. Moore

Mr. David E. Moore is a lawyer practicing criminal law, white collar crime, drugs and narcotics and 1 other area of law. David received a B.A. degree from Baylor University in 1983, and has been licensed for 41 years. David practices at Holmes, Moore, Waldron & Parrish, P.L.L.C. in Longview, TX.

Mr. David E. Moore (Longview, Texas)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. David E. Moore got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for David

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • White Collar Crime
  • Other 2
    • Drugs and Narcotics
    • DWI

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Holmes, Moore, Waldron & Parrish, P.L.L.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    State of Texas vs. James York Brown (Police sergeant James Brown was indicted for capital murder, aggravated kidnapping
    aggravated sexual assault. The alleged criminal acts were supposedly committed in connection to a satanic cult which practiced ritualistic murders
    cannibalism. The State, represented by a special prosecutor
    two "satanic cult experts" sought the death penalty against Sgt. Brown. The case was dismissed prior to trial. The case was also featured as a two-hour special on Dateline NBC, MSNBC Cover to Cover as well as other national television programs)
    United States of America vs. Reginald Rausse (Mr. Rausse was traveling through East Texas by Amtrak train when he was detained by task force officers working a narcotics interdiction on the train. A subsequent consensual pat-down resulted in the discovery of more than a pound of cocaine concealed on his body. After a lengthy suppression hearing in Federal Court, the Judge issued a 52-page order suppressing the evidence. The Government was then forced to dismiss Mr. Rausse's charges)
    United States of America vs. Larry Underwood (Mr. Underwood was stopped on U.S. Hwy 59 in Panola County, Texas northbound from Houston, Texas by a Texas Department of Public Safety trooper. Mr. Underwood consented to a search of his trunk. After one hour of searching the vehicle, the DPS trooper discovered 20 kilograms of cocaine in a hidden compartment in the car's bumper. Mr. Underwood was arrested
    his vehicle seized. The Court held a hearing on a motion to suppress filed by David E. Moore. At the conclusion of the evidence, the Court found that Mr. Underwood had been illegally detained, invalidating his "consent." The Government, with their evidence suppressed, dismissed the charges against Mr. Underwood
    returned his vehicle
    State of Texas vs. Heraclio Vasquez (Mr. Vasquez, an illegal immigrant, was detained on a Greyhound bus in Cass County, Texas by a narcotics task force officer. Mr. Vasquez spoke no English
    the female narcotics officer did not speak Spanish. The officer ultimately searched Mr. Vasquez
    his luggage. She located a pound of cocaine. After a suppression hearing, the District Court found that due to the language barrier, the "consent" to search would not have been voluntary
    suppressed the evidence. The charges against Mr. Vasquez were dismissed).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1985, Texas
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
    Memberships
    Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (Secretary)
    National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Baylor University School of Law
    Class of 1984
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Baylor University
    Class of 1983
    B.A.

Email Mr. David E. Moore

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Mr. David E. Moore was admitted in 1985 to the State of Texas.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Mr. David E. Moore is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Mr. David E. Moore will accept Discover, MasterCard and Visa.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Holmes & Moore, P.L.L.C. has 4 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Mr. David E. Moore attended Baylor University School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions