×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Pinks & WhitePartner
Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie
Pro

Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie

Not yet reviewed

140 Fell Court, Suite 303, Hauppauge, NY 11788

Litigation and Bankruptcy

About Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie

Pi Sigma Alpha. Member, Walter E. Chandler American Inns of Court, 1966—. Member, Virginia State Bankruptcy News Committee.

CLE LECTURES AND PRESENTATIONS

Federal Rules of Evidence in Adversary Proceedings, November 2004

Preference Litigation Under Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code, September 2006

Mechanics of Bankruptcy Appellate Practice, September 2007

Recent Cases in the United States Bankruptcy Court For The District Of Maryland, January 2008

Pro Se Bankruptcy Filings, February 2012

 

Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie (Hauppauge, New York) View website

Reviews for Jonathan W.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Bankruptcy

Practice Details

  • Languages
    French
    Spanish
    Italian
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Pinks & White
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases

    In re: Augie/Restivo Baking Co., 860 F.2d 515 (2d Cir.1988)

    In re: Wefco, Inc., 97 B.R. 749 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1989)

    Mara Bros. General Contractors vs. Rogers, 160 A.D. 2d 979 (2nd Dept. 1990)

    In re: 1350 Piccard Ltd. Partnership, 148 B.R. 83 (Bankr. D.C. 1992)

    In re: Sundown Associates, 150 B.R. 156 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1992)

    In re: Del Ray Associates, 212 B.R., 511 (Bankr. D. Md. 1997)

    Foggy Bottom Ass’n vs. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 791 A.D.2d 64 (D.C. Ct. of Appeals 2002)

    In re: Porter Hayden Co., 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 4315 (Bankr. D. Md. 2006)

    Wickers Sportswear, Inc. vs. Gentry Mills, Inc., 411 F.Supp. 202 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)

    Remco Energy Solutions vs. Weinstock, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3114 (Bankr. D. Md. 2007)

    Hamlet at Willow Creed Development Co. LLC vs. Northeast L
    Development, 64 A.D. 3d 85 (2d Dept. 2009)

    East Hampton U.F.S.D. vs. S
    pebble Builders, Inc., 90 A.D. 3d 820 (2nd Dept. 2011)

    East Hampton U.F.S.D. vs. S
    pebble Builders, Inc., 90 A.D. 3d 815 (2nd Dept. 2011)

    East Hampton U.F.S.D. vs. S
    pebble Builders, Inc., 90 A.D. 3d 815 (2nd Dept. 2011)

    S
    pebble Builders, Inc. vs. Mansir, 90 A.D. 3d 888 (2nd Dept. 2011)

    Puma Sidewalk vs. GDY Properties, Inc., 2011 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1348 (2011 N.Y. Sup. Ct. Nassau Cty.)

    Hamlet at Willow Creed Development Co. LLC vs. Northeast L
    Development, 99 A.D. 3d 661 (2d Dept. 2012)

    East Hampton U.F.S.D. vs. S
    pebble Builders, Inc., 35 Misc. 3d 1209(A) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Suffolk Cty. 2012)
  • Additional Links
    http://www.pinksarbeit.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1988, New York
    1989, District of Columbia
    1990, Virginia
    1991, Maryland
    1992, Colorado
    Memberships
    American Bankruptcy Institute.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Vanderbilt University
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Georgetown University
    Class of 1982
    B.S.F.S.
    cum laude

    Sorbonne, Paris, France
    Diplome Semestriel
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1960
    New York, New York, March 28, 1960

Contact Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie

Partner at Pinks & White
Not yet reviewed

140 Fell Court, Suite 303Hauppauge, NY 11788U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Email Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie was admitted in 1988 to the State of New York.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie speaks French, Spanish and Italian.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Pinks & White has 5 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Mr. Jonathan W. Lipshie attended Vanderbilt University.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions