×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Office | Greenville, SC
Choose Office Branch
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
District of Columbia
England
Florida
Georgia
Germany
Illinois
Indiana
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Mexico
North Carolina
New Jersey
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Ontario
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia
U.S. Virgin Islands
Washington
Wisconsin

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

4.5
27 reviews

300 North Main Street, Suite 500, Greenville, SC 29601, U.S.A.

Employment and Labor Law (federal and state), Employment Litigation, Public Employment and 35 more

MEET OUR TEAM

Share Holder Thomas A.
Bright
Meet all 35 Lawyers

About Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. is a law firm established in 1977 with an office in Greenville, SC. At this office location, there are 35 lawyers practicing employment and labor law (federal and state), employment litigation, public employment and 35 other areas of law.

Awards

Silver Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 3 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.0 or higher.
Champion Badge Silver
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. got this award in 2021

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

Have you consulted or hired this firm?

Leave a review about your experience with this firm.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.5
See All Reviews
27
4.5
Lawyers.com
27
4.7
Martindale
1073
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-10 of 27 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
63%
4 stars
22%
3 stars
7%
2 stars
0%
1 star
7%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
4.5
Quality of Service
4.6
Responsiveness
4.4
Value for Money
4.5
Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
August 24, 2017
Hired Attorney Mr. Ronald Chapman Jr.

Professional, high integrity, strategic, practical, problem solver, responsive, knowledgable, excellent communicator and confident presence with Executive Management team and Board of Directors.

Immigration
Posted by anonymous
April 03, 2019
Hired Law Firm

I recievied my H1-B RFE and my employer decided to transfer my case with Ogletree to resolve RFE as we were not satisfy with my previous legal firm who originally filed H1-B. Caroline and Sarah's team from Ogletree worked so hard to prepare solid draft of the RFE and also guided us in positive and correct direction throughout. Finally I just got my H1-B approved 2 days ago.... I would high recommend this law firm for their professionalism and responsiveness,

 
Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA)
Posted by anonymous
September 21, 2017
Hired Attorney Tracey Truesdale

Tracey is a very knowledgeable and pragmatic attorney. She is not afraid to fight but is well-respected by OSHA.

Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
September 21, 2017
Hired Attorney Tracey Truesdale

It was a joy to work with Tracey Truesdale. She helped us navigate a delicate transition.

Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
August 28, 2017
Hired Attorney Mr. Michael Eckard

Excellent and pragmatic business knowledge.

Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
July 27, 2016
Hired Attorney Mr. Michael Eckard

Michael was a true pleasure to work with. He prepared me for everything I faced. We worked together as partners from day one until resolution. He had my back through it all. I cannot say enough about this remarkable attorney.

Civil Rights
Posted by anonymous
October 01, 2013
Hired Attorney Mr. James Barrett

Mr. Barrett was exceptional. His understanding of our situation and how to mitigate potential legal entanglements was spot on. He was prompt in his response to our inquiries and always kept us abreast of how things were progressing. He was very aggressive in defending our position and putting others on notice we would defend ourselves.

Workers Compensation
Posted by anonymous
August 04, 2013
Hired Attorney Timothy Palmer
Immigration
Posted by anonymous
January 28, 2011
Hired Attorney Marifrances Morrison

Not enough space to tell you about Ms Morrison. She holds a very special place in our hearts. My family and friends will allays be thankful to Ms Morrison. When other lawyers turned their back on us the law firm of Richard Iandoli and Ms Morrison was the only lawyers that took matters into their hands, like we knew each other for a long time. I live in Boston, have a family and we always remember how she helped me, my friends and my family. THANKS

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment 20
    • Employment and Labor Law (federal and state)
    • Employment Litigation
    • ADA
    • Family and Medical Leave Act
    • Harassment
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Law
    • Fair Labor Standards Act
    • Wage and Hour Law
    • Wrongful Termination Defense
    • Whistleblower Litigation
    • Reductions in Force
    • WARN Act
    • Covenants Not To Compete
    • Employment Class Actions
    • Employment Arbitration
    • National Labor Relations Act
    • Collective Bargaining
    • Unfair Labor Practice Charges
    • Labor Strikes
    • Prevailing Wage Litigation

  • Civil Rights 3
    • Employment Discrimination
    • Employment Civil Rights
    • Title VII
  • Affirmative Action
  • Administrative Law 1
    • Administrative Agency Practice
  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Unfair Competition and Trade Secret Litigation
  • Election, Campaign and Political Law 1
    • Union Representation Elections
  • Immigration 1
    • Immigration Law
  • Workers Compensation
  • Employee Benefits 1
    • ERISA
  • Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) 1
    • Occupational Safety and Health
  • Natural Resources 1
    • Mine Safety
  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Indians and Native Populations 1
    • Native American Law
  • Other 3
    • Public Employment
    • ADEA
    • EEOC Claims

Office Details

  • Firm History
    Year Established

    1977

  • Representative Clients

    REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS: Allied Holdings; BASF Corporation; Baxter International, Inc.; Becon Construction Company; Bechtel Corporation; Bi-Lo, Inc.; BorgWarner, Inc.; Burlington Industries, Inc.; Celanese, AG; Chrysler Group LLC; Collins & Aikman Corp.; D.R. Horton, Inc.; DTE Energy; Duke Energy Corp.; Eastman Kodak Company; FedEx Freight West; FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.; Flour Enterprises, Inc.; Freightliner Corporation; General Electric Co.; HCA — The Healthcare Company; Hitachi Electronics Devices, Inc. (USA); Hoechst, AG; ICT Group, Inc.; Ingersoll-Rand Company; John Deere Consumer Products, Inc.; JPS Industries; Kelly Services, Inc.; Kemet Electronics Corp.; Kohler Company; Komatsu American International Company; KoSa; Lloyd's of London; Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company; Masco Corporation; Mattel, Inc.; MCI WorldCom; Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.; Metaldyne; Michelin North America, Inc.; Michigan Consolidated Gas Company; Milliken & Company; Mitsubishi; Nissan North America, Inc.; Pfizer Inc.; Professional Indemnity Agency; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.; Roadway Express, Inc.; Schlumberger; Sonoco Products Company; The Detroit Edison Company; ThyssenKrupp; Valero Energy Corporation; VF Corporation; Wachovia Bank, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; WestPoint Stevens Inc.; Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.; Wright & Filippis; Zachry Construction Corporation.

  • Additional Links

    http://www.ogletreedeakins.com

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

4.5
27 reviews

The Ogletree Building300 North Main Street, Suite 500Greenville, SC 29601U.S.A.

Show on map

Email Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions