×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Kamine Law PCPrincipal
no photo

Bernard Samuel Kamine

Not yet reviewed

9440 S. Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 301, Beverly Hills, CA 90210

General Practice, Public Finance & Tax Exempt Finance, Real Estate and 3 more

About Bernard Samuel Kamine

Bernard Samuel Kamine is a lawyer practicing general practice, public finance & tax exempt finance, real estate and 3 other areas of law. Bernard received a B.A. degree from University of Denver in 1965, and has been licensed for 57 years. Bernard practices at Kamine Law PC in Beverly Hills, CA.

Bernard Samuel Kamine (Beverly Hills, California)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Bernard Samuel Kamine got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Bernard

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • General Practice
  • Real Estate
  • Construction Law
  • Government Contracts
  • Litigation
  • Other 1
    • Public Finance & Tax Exempt Finance

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    Kamine Law PC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT: Amelco Electric v. City of Thous
    Oaks (2002) 27 C4th 228, 115 CR2d 900, 38 P3d 1120 (Amicus Brief for Engineering Contractors' Association)
    Kajima/Ray Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2000) 23 C4th 305, 96 CR2d 747, 1 P3d 63
    Domar V. City of Los Angeles (1994) 9 C4th 161, 36 CR2d 521, 885 P2d 934CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS: Tutor-Saliba-Perini, J.V. v. The Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (2005) 2005 Cal.App.Unpub.LEXIS 641 (Amicus Brief for the Engineering Contractors' Association)
    Polibrid Coatings, Inc. v. Superior Court (2003) 112 CA4th 920, 6CR3d 7
    Amelco Electric v. City of Thous
    Oaks (2000) 82 CA4th 373, 98 CR2d 159 (vacated by grant of petition for review) (Amicus Brief for Engineering Contractors' Association)
    Kajima/Ray Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (1999) 69 CA4th 1458, 82 CR2d 348 (vacated by grant of petition for review) Simon, Error Forces MTA Panel to Accept Higher Bid, Los Angeles Times, February 10, 1995, p. B1, Jilted Low Bidder Wins Again, Engineering News Record, March 1, 1999, p. 14
    Domar V. City of Los Angeles (1995) 41 CA4th 810, 48CR3d 1188, 218 CR 667
    Wang v. Div. of Labor St
    ards Enforcement (1990) 219 CA3d 1152, 268 CR 669
    Westinghouse Electric v. County of L.A. (1982) CA3d 771, 181 CR 332.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1969, California
    1969, Colorado
    Memberships
    Los Angeles County Bar Association (Chair, Construction Law Subsection, 1981-1983)
    State Bar of California.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Harvard University
    Class of 1968
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Denver
    Class of 1965
    B.A.
  • Military Service
    Colonel, Infantry, USAR, 1969-2003

Bernard Samuel Kamine

Principal at Kamine Law PC
Not yet reviewed

9440 S. Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 301Beverly Hills, CA 90210U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Hillary Johns
Pro
Hillary Johns
5.0
54
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

747-400-1329
View Profile
Gary Alan Dordick
Pro
Gary Alan Dordick
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

424-359-1437
View Profile
James J. Finsten
Pro
James J. Finsten
3.0
1
General Practice lawyer
424-478-5582
View Profile
Britany Michelle Engelman
Pro
Britany Michelle Engelman
5.0
21
General Practice lawyer
844-786-4893
View Profile
Yan Goldshteyn
Pro
Yan Goldshteyn
4.9
16
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

424-480-5046
View Profile

Email Bernard Samuel Kamine

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions