×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Mr. Greg Thomas Rinckey

Mr. Greg Thomas Rinckey

3.0
4 reviews

3420 Executive Center Dr Suite 160, Austin, TX 78731

Federal Employment Law, Military Law, Security Clearance Representation and 5 more

About Mr. Greg Thomas Rinckey

Mr. Greg Thomas Rinckey is a lawyer practicing federal employment law, military law, security clearance representation and 5 other areas of law. Greg received a B.B.A. degree from Hofstra University, and has been licensed for 28 years. Greg practices at Tully Rinckey, PLLC in Austin, TX.

Mr. Greg Thomas Rinckey (Austin, Texas)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. Greg Thomas Rinckey got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Greg

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
3.0
See All Reviews
4
3.0
Lawyers.com
4
4.8
Martindale
17
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-4 of 4 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
50%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
50%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
3.0
Quality of Service
3.0
Responsiveness
3.0
Value for Money
3.0
Military Law
Posted by anonymous
September 07, 2017
Hired Attorney

I was unjustly accused of serious misconduct. Greg helped me establish the truth and what was a career ending and possible jail situation was completely resolved in my favor. I was not happy with my military provided counsel and the money I spent on Greg was the best purchase that I have ever made!

Military Law
Posted by anonymous
September 07, 2011
Hired Attorney

Unbelievable. Received over $5,000.00 from military leave charged for weekend active duty as a reservist. This would not have happened without his help.

Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
October 06, 2011
Hired Attorney

The law firm takes the case, interviews you regarding your problem. Then, you are not informed of what they actually do. My case went through 4 attorneys, got transferred to their D.C. office (with Steve Herrick), then recently back to NY State. My case was to register a complaint with the EEOC. Now, my retainer is drained and nothing has been done.

 
Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
August 27, 2010
Hired Attorney

They do not update clients with their case, they do not return phone calls, pass my case from one lawyer to another and then lose it. I have sent them numerous e-mails regarding the status of my case and they do not have the decency to return my calls. I am thoroughly disgusted with the services this firm has provided.

From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Military Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Business Law
  • Other 5
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Security Clearance Representation
    • Whistleblower Representation
    • International Legal Services
    • Family

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Founding Partner
    Firm Name
    Tully Rinckey, PLLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Greg T. Rinckey - Garcia v. Department of State Marc - A. Garcia petitioned for review of an initial decision denying his request for corrective action. Garcia was granted the petition
    the original decision was vacated. Held that the board could adjudicate claims of USERRA violations prior to the statute's enactment.
    Greg T. Rinckey - Savage v. Savage - Successful Supreme Court appeal in which lower court decision which found client to be in willful violation of a child support order was reversed
    reimbursed counsel fees.
    Mathew B. Tully
    Greg T. Rinckey - Collins v. Department of the Agriculture - Filed an appeal alleging that while employed by the Department of the Agriculture he was charged military leave even on non-work days which caused him to use annual, sick, or leave without pay to perform military duties from 1989 -2000. Based on USERRA, the agency was ordered to correct its records
    to pay appellant the back pay that was owed.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1998, New York
    Army Court of Criminal Appeals
    Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
    District of Columbia
    Federal Court of Claims
    New Jersey
    United States Supreme Court
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 7th and 8th Federal Circuits
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Touro Law School
    Class of 1998
    J.D.
    magna cum laude
    Other Education
    Hofstra University
    B.B.A.

    State University of New York at Albany
    M.B.A.

Email Mr. Greg Thomas Rinckey

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions