×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Mr. Stanley Edward Fisher

Not yet reviewed

725 12th St. N.W., Washington, DC 20005-3901

Appeals, Litigation and Government

About Mr. Stanley Edward Fisher

Mr. Stanley Edward Fisher is a lawyer practicing appeals, litigation, government. Stanley received a B.S. degree from Yale University in 1997, and has been licensed for 22 years. Stanley practices at Williams & Connolly LLP in Washington, DC.

Mr. Stanley Edward Fisher (Washington, District of Columbia)

Reviews for Stanley

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Government
  • Other 1
    • Appeals

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Williams & Connolly LLP

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2004, Virginia
    2006, District of Columbia
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia and U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
    U.S. Supreme Court
    registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
    Memberships
    Virginia, Federal Circuit and American Bar Associations.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    The George Washington University Law School
    Class of 2004
    J.D.
    with highest honors
    Other Education
    Yale University
    Class of 1997
    B.S.
    Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1975
    New Haven, Connecticut, November 23, 1975

Mr. Stanley Edward Fisher

Partner at Williams & Connolly LLP
Not yet reviewed

725 12th St. N.W.Washington, DC 20005-3901U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Faith Kalman Reyes
Pro
Faith Kalman Reyes
4.4
2
Appellate Practice lawyer
771-240-4320
View Profile
Frederick A. Douglas
Pro
Frederick A. Douglas
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
771-232-9365
View Profile
Richard Carnell Baker, Esq.
Pro
Richard Carnell Baker, Esq.
4.4
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
771-224-8358
View Profile
Jocelyn S. Szymanowski
Pro
Jocelyn S. Szymanowski
5.0
6
Appellate Practice lawyer
443-909-4791
View Profile
Martin Bienstock
Pro
Martin Bienstock
5.0
2
Appellate Practice lawyer
771-220-5981
View Profile

Email Mr. Stanley Edward Fisher

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions