×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Office | Washington, DC

Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P.

Not yet reviewed

Washington, DC

Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks and 146 more

MEET OUR TEAM

Partner David Samuel
Abrams
Meet all 5 Lawyers

About Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P.

Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P. is a law firm established in 1956 with an office in Washington, DC. At this office location, there are 5 lawyers practicing intellectual property, patents, trademarks and 146 other areas of law.

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P. got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P.

This firm does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 85
    • Patents
    • Trademarks
    • Copyrights
    • Trade Secrets
    • Chemical Patents
    • Electrical Patents
    • Mechanical Patents
    • Internet Trademarks
    • International Patents
    • Artistic Property
    • Chemical Intellectual Property
    • Electrical Intellectual Property
    • Electronic Intellectual Property
    • Industrial Models and Designs
    • Industrial Property
    • Industrial Property Rights
    • Intellectual Property Infringement
    • Intellectual Property Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property Enforcement
    • Intellectual Property Licensing
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Portfolio Management
    • Intellectual Property Prosecution
    • International Licensing
    • Intellectual Property Procurement
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • International Intellectual Property
    • Internet Intellectual Property
    • Literary Property
    • Mechanical Intellectual Property
    • Medical Intellectual Property
    • Merchandising
    • New Media Law
    • Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property
    • Piracy
    • Proprietary Rights
    • Protection of Personality
    • Biochemical Patents
    • Biotechnology Patent Prosecution
    • Biotechnology Patents
    • Chemical Patent Prosecution
    • Computer and Software Patents
    • Computer Architecture Patents
    • Design Patents
    • Electrical Patent Prosecution
    • Electro-Mechanical Patents
    • Electronic Patents
    • International Patent Prosecution
    • Internet Patents
    • Mechanical Patent Prosecution
    • Medical Patents
    • Metallurgical Patents
    • Molecular Biology Patents
    • Patent Applications
    • Patent Infringement
    • Patent Interference Practice
    • Patent Licensing
    • Patent Litigation
    • Patent Portfolio Management
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Patent Protection
    • Pharmaceutical Patent Prosecution
    • Pharmaceutical Patents
    • Counterfeiting
    • International Trademarks
    • Lanham Act
    • Service Marks
    • Trade Dress
    • Trade Names
    • Trademark Arbitration
    • Trademark Infringement
    • Trademark Licensing
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Trademark Prosecution
    • Trademark Protection
    • Trademark Registration
    • Copyright Infringement
    • Copyright Licensing
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Copyright Prosecution
    • Copyright Protection
    • Copyright Registration
    • International Copyright Law
    • Internet Copyright Law
    • Software Copyright

  • Litigation 3
    • Federal Civil Litigation
    • Internet Litigation
    • Technical Litigation
  • Internet Law 4
    • E-Commerce
    • Cybersquatting
    • Domain Name Infringement
    • Domain Names
  • Communications and Media 1
    • Media Law
  • Technology and Science 24
    • Biotechnology
    • Biomedical Technology
    • Computers and Software
    • Data Protection
    • Software Licensing
    • Software Protection
    • Agrochemicals
    • Chemistry
    • Coatings Technology
    • Explosives Technology
    • Fiber Optics
    • High Technology
    • Inorganic Chemistry
    • Internet Technology
    • Laser Technology
    • Materials Science
    • Medical Technology
    • Nanotechnology
    • Organic Chemistry
    • Petroleum Chemistry
    • Polymers
    • Semiconductor Technology
    • Technology Law
    • Technology Licensing
  • Unfair Competition
  • Advertising and Marketing 2
    • Advertising Law
    • False Advertising
  • Bankruptcy 6
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Commercial Bankruptcy
    • Creditor Bankruptcy
    • Fraudulent Conveyance
    • Insolvency
    • Creditors Rights in Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Complex Commercial Litigation
  • Debtor and Creditor
  • Energy 3
    • Alternative Energy
    • Cogeneration
    • Wind Energy
  • Entertainment Law 1
    • Entertainment and the Arts
  • Business Law 2
    • Business Method Patents
    • Technology Joint Ventures
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 7
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 13
  • Contracts 2
    • High Technology Contracts
    • Technology Contracts
  • International Law 1
    • International High Technology
  • Other 2
    • Licensing
    • USPTO Proceedings

Office Details

  • Languages

    French
    Russian
    Ukrainian
    Korean
    M
    arin Chinese.

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features

    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available

  • Firm History
    Year Established

    1956

  • State Bar Summary

    All Members and Associates are members of the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Virginia.

  • Representative Clients

    REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS: American Agricultural Insurance Company; Bank of America; The George Washington University; Hubbell Incorporated; Pure Fishing, Inc.; Samsung Electronics; Sirius XM Radio; Spherics Incorporated.

  • Additional Links

    http://www.roylance.com

Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P.

Not yet reviewed

P.O. Box 66372Washington, DC 20035-6372U.S.A.

Show on map

Email Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P.

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions