×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law CorporationSenior Counsel
no photo

Briana J. Bramer

Not yet reviewed

1331 North California Boulevard, Fifth Floor, P.O. Box 8177, Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Appellate Advocacy, Commercial & Business Litigation and Commercial Lease Disputes

About Briana J. Bramer

Briana J. Bramer is a lawyer practicing appellate advocacy, commercial & business litigation, commercial lease disputes. Briana J. received a BA degree from University of California, Berkeley in 2010, and has been licensed for 12 years. Briana J. practices at Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law Corporation in Walnut Creek, CA.

Briana J. Bramer (Walnut Creek, California)

Reviews for Briana J. Bramer

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 3
    • Appellate Advocacy
    • Commercial & Business Litigation
    • Commercial Lease Disputes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Counsel
    Firm Name
    Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Won a motion for summary judgment on behalf of a homeowner dismissing the plaintiff's complaint for premises liability because the alleged assault did not occur on our client's property
    because our client was not liable for third-party criminal conduct.
    Represented the distributor of research laboratory products in a complex litigation action involving claims for breach of a commercial real estate contract
    environmental contamination. Assisted the client in ensuring compliance with CLRA.
    Represented the manufacturer of a nationally distributed product to ensure compliance with the Toxic Substances Control Act under the EPA. We also assisted the client in complying with CLRA
    other EPA rules.
    Negotiated a highly favorable settlement on behalf of a commercial l
    lord to resolve a dispute involving claims for breach of contract brought by its commercial tenant after the client exercised its option not to renew the lease.
    Won a motion to strike the plaintiff's claims for punitive damages for alleged negligence
    premises liability on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to produce evidence showing punitive damages or any cause of action that would support said damages were warranted.
    Successfully negotiated additional reasonable accommodations for a minor, including a part-time aide on behalf of a parent of a child with disabilities.
    Won a motion for attorneys' fees
    costs in DC federal court based on lodestar calculation (special education law), determined by the court to be appropriate in light of the successful outcome at the administrative hearing on behalf of the parent
    guardian ad litem of a child who had been denied a free
    appropriate public education.
    Represented the parent of a child with disabilities to develop a behavioral intervention plan
    secure an appropriate least restrictive environment in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2013, California
    United States District Court - Northern District of California
    United States District Court - Southern District of California
    United States District Court - Central District of California
    United States District Court - Eastern District of California
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law
    Class of 2013
    JD
    Other Education
    University of California, Berkeley
    Class of 2010
    BA
    cum laude

Email Briana J. Bramer

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions