×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Arthur Fred Coon

Arthur Fred Coon

Not yet reviewed

1331 North California Boulevard, Fifth Floor, P.O. Box 8177, Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Administrative Law & Hearings, Appellate Advocacy, Eminent Domain & Inverse Condemnation and 4 more

About Arthur Fred Coon

Arthur Fred Coon is a lawyer practicing administrative law & hearings, appellate advocacy, eminent domain & inverse condemnation and 4 other areas of law. Arthur received a B.A. degree from University of Southern California in 1982, and has been licensed for 40 years. Arthur practices at Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law Corporation in Walnut Creek, CA.

 

Arthur Fred Coon (Walnut Creek, California)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Arthur Fred Coon got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Arthur

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Environmental Law
  • Litigation
  • Other 5
    • Administrative Law & Hearings
    • Appellate Advocacy
    • Eminent Domain & Inverse Condemnation
    • Land Disputes, Easements & Lien Priority Claims
    • Land Use & CEQA

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Save Lafayette Trees v. East Bay Regional Park District (Pacific Gas
    Electric Company, Real Party in Interest) (1st Dist. 2021) 66 Cal.App.5th 21.
    Organizacion Communidad de Alviso v. City of San Jose (6th Dist. 2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 783
    Save Lafayette Trees v. City of Lafayette, (1st Dist. 2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 148
    Heron Bay Homeowners Association v. City of San Le
    ro (1st Dist. 2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 376
    Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma, et al., Ronald
    Ernest Ohlson, dba Ohlson Ranch (Real Parties in Interest
    Respondents) (1st Dist. 2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 11
    James P. Wilson, et al. v. County of Napa, et al. (1st Dist. 2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 178
    California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369 (authored amici curiae brief on behalf of League of California Cities
    three counties)
    The Sierra Club v. Board of Supervisors of County of Napa, et al. (1st Dist. 2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162
    Napa Citizens for Honest Govt., et al. v. Napa County Board of Supervisors (1st Dist. 2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 432
    Borden Ranch Partnership
    Tsakopoulos v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al. (261 F.3d 810 (9th Cir. 2001)
    U.S. Supreme Court, Case No. 01-1243
    Mervyn's v. Reyes (1st Dist. 1998) 69 Cal.App.4th 93
    San Diego Gas & Electric v. Superior Court (1996) 13 Cal.4th 893 (argued to Court on behalf of amicus curiae)
    Benton v. County of Napa (1st Dist. 1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1485

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1986, California
    2001, U.S. Supreme Court
    1986, U.S. District Court, Northern and Eastern Districts of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships

    Associations

    Bay Area Council

    Bay Area Economic Forum's CEQA Work Group - Former Member

    Bay Planning Coalition

    •Former Member of the Executive and Legislative and Policy Committees
    •Former Board of Directors Member

    California Land Use Law and Policy Reporter, Argent Communications - Former Editor, Current Advisory Board Member

    LEED Accredited Professional (2008, Legacy)

    Sustainable Walnut Creek - Founding Member

    U.S. Green Building Council, Northern California Chapter, Diablo East Bay Branch - Founding Member, Former Vice Chair

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Davis School of Law
    Class of 1986
    J.D.
    Order of the Coif
    Other Education
    University of Southern California
    Class of 1982
    B.A.

    American Jurisprudence Awards Recipient

    Law Review Editor

    Trial Practice Honors Board Member
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1960
    Oakland, California, November 20, 1960

Arthur Fred Coon

Share Holder at Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law Corporation
Not yet reviewed

1331 North California Boulevard, Fifth FloorP.O. Box 8177Walnut Creek, CA 94596U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Seth P. Chazin
Pro
Seth P. Chazin
4.8
22
Administrative Law lawyer

Free Consultation

844-300-3342
View Profile
George William Wolff
Pro
George William Wolff
4.9
3
Administrative Law lawyer

Free Consultation

415-975-4338
View Profile
Seth P. Chazin
Pro
Seth P. Chazin
4.8
22
Administrative Law lawyer

Free Consultation

844-300-3342
View Profile
Mandy Gina Leigh
Pro
Mandy Gina Leigh
5.0
21
Administrative Law lawyer

Free Consultation

415-417-2049
View Profile
Mandy Gina Leigh
Pro
Mandy Gina Leigh
5.0
21
Administrative Law lawyer

Free Consultation

415-417-2049
View Profile

Email Arthur Fred Coon

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions