×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Taylor, Ryan, Minton & Van Dalsem, P.C.Partner
Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem

Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem

Not yet reviewed

1437 South Boulder Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74119-3640

Personal Injury Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Appellate Practice and 2 more

About Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem

Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem is a lawyer practicing personal injury litigation, commercial litigation, appellate practice and 2 other areas of law. Neil D. received a B.A. degree from Oklahoma State University, and has been licensed for 32 years. Neil D. practices at Taylor, Ryan, Minton & Van Dalsem, P.C. in Tulsa, OK.

Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem (Tulsa, Oklahoma)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Neil D.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 2
    • Personal Injury Litigation
    • Criminal Defense

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Accepted Credit Cards
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Taylor, Ryan, Minton & Van Dalsem, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    U.S. v. Harrison, 639 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir. 2011)
    Chapman v. Baker, 430 Fed. Appx. 731 (10th Cir. 2011)
    J.M. ex rel. Morris v. Hillsdale Independent School, 397 Fed. Appx. 445 (10th Cir. 2010)
    Chapman v. Barcus, 372 Fed. Appx. 899 (10th Cir. 2010)
    Chapman v. Barcus, 2009 WL 57092 (N.D. Okla)
    Farmers v. Daniel, 2008 WL 5101305 (W.D. Okla. 2008)
    Woodrich v. Farmers Ins. Co., 405 F.Supp.2d 1276 (N.D. Okla. 2004)
    Lewis v. Wise, 2008 WL 5142290 (N.D. Okla. 2008)
    Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86, 223 P.3d 966
    S.R. v. Stockdale, 2009 OK CIV APP 68, 216 P.3d 305
    Burwell v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., 2006 OK CIV APP 97,142 P.3d 1005
    Gonzalez v. Sessom, 2006 OK CIV APP 61, 137 P.3d 1245
    London v. Farmers Ins. Co., 2003 OK CIV APP 10, 63 P.3d 552
    Jones v. Fischer, 1998 OK CIV APP 158
    Carlos v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 1996 OK CIV APP 158, 935 P. 2d 1182.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1994, Oklahoma
    1995, U.S. District Court, Northern, Eastern and Western Districts of Oklahoma
    1996, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    2006, U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    Tulsa County and Oklahoma Bar Associations
    Oklahoma Association of Defense Counsel.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Tulsa
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    with highest honors
    Other Education
    Oklahoma State University
    B.A.
    with highest honors 1991
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1969
    Tulsa, Oklahoma, October 19, 1969
    Hobbies & Interests
    Beekeeping

Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem

Partner at Taylor, Ryan, Minton & Van Dalsem, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

Suite 1080, Boulder Towers1437 South Boulder AvenueTulsa, OK 74119-3640U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

James D. Johnson
Pro
James D. Johnson
4.4
1
General Practice lawyer
918-925-9186
View Profile
John B. Nicks
Pro
John B. Nicks
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer
539-666-8733
View Profile
Rebecca Sellers Woodward
Pro
Rebecca Sellers Woodward
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer
539-666-9123
View Profile
Timothy L. Rogers
Pro
Timothy L. Rogers
4.8
9
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

539-666-0104
View Profile
Trevor Lee Reynolds
Pro
Trevor Lee Reynolds
4.3
3
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

539-666-8981
View Profile

Email Mr. Neil D. Van Dalsem

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions