×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Hacker Murphy LLPSenior Counsel
Carl Rosenbloom
Pro

Carl Rosenbloom

5.0
1 review

28 2nd Street, Troy, NY 12180

Real Property Law, Eminent Domain, Property Tax and 2 more

About Carl Rosenbloom

Mr. Rosenbloom is senior of counsel to the firm and focuses his litigation practice on real estate tax reduction (tax certiorari), condemnation, eminent domain and appeals.

Carl Rosenbloom (Troy, New York) View website

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Carl Rosenbloom got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Carl

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Eminent Domain
  • Taxation 1
    • Property Tax
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Real Property Law
    • Condemnation

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    Zoom
    Skype
    FaceTime
    Microsoft teams
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Counsel
    Firm Name
    Hacker Murphy LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Allied Signal v. Town of Camillus, 80 N.Y.2d 351 (1992)
    Amarwick v. State of New York, 84 Misc. 2d 112, aff'd on opinion below 52 A.D. 2d 1007 (1976)
    American Cyanamid Co. v. Bd. of Assessors, 243 A.D. 2d 630 (1997)
    Baba-Ali v. State of New York, 20 A.D. 3d 376 (2005)
    Butler v. Delaware Otsego Corp., 203 A.D. 2d 783 (1994)
    Capital Medical Systems, Inc. v. Fuji Medical Systems, U.S.A., Inc., 270 A.D. 2d 728 (2000)
    City of Olean v. New York Environmental Facilities Corp., 213 A.D. 2d 1018 (1995)
    Clifton Country Road Associates v. Vinciguerra, 195 A.D. 2d 895 (1993)
    Colgan v. Town of Hillsdale, 68 N.Y. 2d 788 (1986)
    Crane v. State of New York, 29 A.D. 2d 649 (1993)
    Ed Guth Realty, Inc. v. Gingold, 34 N.Y. 2d 440 (1974)
    Fishman v. Mills, 294 A.D. 2d 764 (2002)
    General Electric v. Town of Salina, 69 N.Y. 2d 730 (1986)
    Hubbard v. Town of S
    Lake, 211 A.D. 2d 1005 (1995)
    Hubbard v. Town of S
    Lake, 223 A.D. 2d 794 (1196)
    Matter of Country Knolls Water Works v. Hoffman, 229 A.D. 2d 859 (1996)
    L
    au v. Assessor of Town of Carmel, 236 A.D. 2d 403 (1997)
    Matter of William St. John, 105 A.D. 2d 530 (1984)
    Mickel v. State of New York, 77 A.D. 2d 794 (1980)
    Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Bethlehem, 225 A.D. 2d 841 (1996)
    SDR Holdings, Inc. v. Tpwn of Fort Edward, 290 A.D. 2d 696 (2002)
    Matter of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Town of Sharon Board of Assessors, 298 A.D. 2d 758 (2002)
    Vinciguerra v. Northside Partnership, 188 A.D. 2d 861 (1992)
    Zappavigna v. State of New York, 186 A.D. 2d 552 (1992).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1964, New York
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Albany Law School of Union University
    Class of 1963
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    University of Buffalo
    Class of 1960
    B.A.

Contact Carl Rosenbloom

Senior Counsel at Hacker Murphy LLP
5.0
1 review

28 2nd StreetTroy, NY 12180U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Saturday By appointment
  • Sunday By appointment

Email Carl Rosenbloom

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Carl Rosenbloom was admitted in 1964 to the State of New York.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Carl Rosenbloom has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Carl Rosenbloom offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Hacker Murphy LLP has 15 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Carl Rosenbloom attended Albany Law School of Union University.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions