×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Lenczner SlaghtAttorney
no photo

Veronica C. Tsou

Not yet reviewed

130 Adelaide St W, Suite 2600, Toronto, ON M5H 3P5

Intellectual Property

About Veronica C. Tsou

Veronica C. Tsou is a lawyer practicing intellectual property. Veronica C. received a BASc degree from University of Waterloo in 2011, and has been licensed for 10 years. Veronica C. practices at Lenczner Slaght in Toronto, ON.

Veronica C. Tsou (Toronto, Ontario)

Reviews for Veronica C. Tsou

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Lenczner Slaght
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Cases: United American Corp et al v Instagram
    Counsel to Instagram in a patent infringement action relating to methods for the sharing of content on social media.
    Melanie Baird, Andrew Skodyn & Veronica C. Tsou April 2, 2018
    United American Corp et al v Facebook
    Counsel to Facebook in a patent infringement action relating to methods for the sharing of content on social media.
    Melanie Baird, Andrew Skodyn & Veronica C. Tsou April 2, 2018
    Flair Airlines v Gregor LLC
    Counsel to Gregor LLC in a commercial
    domain name dispute. Successfully resisted a motion for interlocutory injunction by having the action dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    Sana Halwani & Veronica C. Tsou March 1, 2018
    Janssen Inc v Apotex Inc
    Counsel to Janssen in proceedings pursuant to the PM(NOC) Regulations relating to Prezista (darunavir), an antiretroviral medication.
    Andrew Skodyn, Melanie Baird, Veronica C. Tsou & Naomi Metcalfe January 8, 2018
    Pharmascience Inc. v Valeant Canada LP
    Counsel to Valeant in an action for damages under section 8 of the PM(NOC) Regulations relating to Sublinox (zolpidem), a medication used to treat insomnia.
    Andrew Skodyn, Sana Halwani, Melanie Baird & Veronica C. Tsou June 13, 2017
    Bauer Hockey Corp. v Under Armour Canada
    Counsel to Under Armour in a patent infringement action relating to hockey shirts. (Prior to joining Lenczner Slaght)
    Veronica C. Tsou March 1, 2015
    Bauer Hockey Corp. v Sport Maska Inc
    Counsel to Sport Maska in a trade-mark infringement action. (Prior to joining Lenczner Slaght)
    Veronica C. Tsou February 1, 2015
    Sea Delight Canada LLC et al v Anova Food LLC et al
    Counsel to Sea Delight in a patent infringement action relating to fish preservation. (Prior to joining Lenczner Slaght)
    Veronica C. Tsou January 1, 2015

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2015, Ontario
    Memberships

    Associations

    • Canadian Bar Association

    • Ontario Bar Association

    • American International Property Law Association (AIPLA)

    • Intellectual Property Owners Association - Member

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Ottawa
    Class of 2014
    J.D.
    Cum Laude
    Other Education
    University of Waterloo
    Class of 2011
    BASc
    Nanotechnology Engineering

Email Veronica C. Tsou

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions