×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Keltie Sim Luft

Keltie Sim Luft

Not yet reviewed

1100-150 York Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2K8

Trademarks, IP Management & Strategic Counselling, Marketing & Advertising and 3 more

About Keltie Sim Luft

Keltie Sim Luft is a lawyer practicing trademarks, ip management & strategic counselling, marketing & advertising and 3 other areas of law. Keltie Sim received a degree from Acadia University in 1978, and has been licensed for 42 years. Keltie Sim practices at Smart & Biggar in Toronto, ON.

Keltie Sim Luft (Toronto, Ontario)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Keltie Sim Luft got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Keltie Sim

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trademarks
  • Other 5
    • IP Management & Strategic Counselling
    • Marketing & Advertising
    • Copyright & Media
    • Licensing & IP Transactions
    • Domain Names & Internet Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner, Toronto; Barrister and Solicitor; Patent and Trademark Agent
    Firm Name
    Smart & Biggar
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Procter & Gamble v. Colgate-Palmolive Canada Inc. (2007) - Representing Colgate, successfully resisted opposition to Colgate application to register GREEN/WHITE/BLUE toothpaste design.
    Canadian Trademark Registration No. 245, 940 ELITE owned by T.S. Simms & Co. Limited maintained by decision of the Registrar dated March 23, 2006.
    Abbott Laboratories v. Alcohol Countermeasure Systems Corp. (November 4, 2002) - Representing Alcohol Countermeasure Systems, obtained withdrawal of opposition by Abbott Laboratories to registration of ENSURE.
    Societe des Produits Nestle S.A. v. Wells' Dairy, Inc. (October 5, 2000) - Representing Nestle, successfully opposed application for registration of POLAR TREATS by Wells' Dairy.
    Novartis Animal Health Canada Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. (May 10, 1999) - Representing Novartis Animal Health Canada, successfully opposed an application by Merck & Co. to register the trademark ELIMINEX.
    Societe des Produits Nestle S.A. v. Marek Pacanowski (December 1, 1997) - Representing Nestle, successfully opposed application for registration of FRAPPE by Marek Pacanowski.
    White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v Beam of Canada Inc. (1991), 39 C.P.R. (3d) 94 (Federal Court, Trial Division) - As co-counsel with John Morrissey, representing Beam of Canada, successfully defended a trademark action by White Consolidated.
    Gorse et al. v Upwardor Corp. (1989), 25 C.P.R. (3d) 166 (Federal Court, Trial Division) - As co-counsel with John Morrissey, represented Paul Gorse in a patent infringement action.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1984, Ontario
    1984, Registered Trade-mark Agent
    1990, Registered Patent Agent
    Registered to practise before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    Memberships
    •fellow, Intellectual Property Institute of Canada
    •Member, International Trademark Association
    •Member, Association of European Trademark Owners (MARQUES)
    member of the MARQUES Programming Team
    •Past member and trustee, Licensing Executives Society

    Bar Fellowship
    Intellectual Property Institute of Canada
    •Member, International Trademark Association
    •Member, Association of European Trademark Owners (MARQUES); member of the MARQUES Programming Team
    •Past member and trustee, Licensing Executives Society

    Speaking engagements

    •Internal Affairs - An update on trademark marketing and licensing issues, panel discussion at the MARQUES Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 2010
    •Brands In and Out of the Box: Who Handles Your Trademark Work? panel discussion at the MARQUES Annual Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, September 2008
    •Analyzing, Interpreting and Reporting on Trademark Searches, Thomson CompuMark Trademarks and the Internet Forum, Toronto, November 2007

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Western Ontario
    Class of 1982
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    Acadia University
    Class of 1978
    B.Sc.

    Acadia University
    Class of 1978
    Hons.

    Acadia University
    Class of 1978
    Mycology

Keltie Sim Luft

Partner, Toronto; Barrister and Solicitor; Patent and Trademark Agent at Smart & Biggar
Not yet reviewed

1100-150 York StreetToronto, ON M5G 2K8Canada

Email Keltie Sim Luft

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions