×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Thomas G Cotter

Not yet reviewed

80 Ferry Blvd Ste 216, Stratford, CT 06615-6079

About Thomas G Cotter

Thomas G Cotter is a lawyer. Thomas received a BS degree from Nichols College in 1978, and has been licensed for 42 years. Thomas practices in Stratford, CT.

Reviews for Thomas

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1984, Connecticut
    1984, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
    1988, U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Professional Memberships: Admitted to bar 1984, Connecticut and U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
    U.S. Supreme Court, 1988
    Bridgeport Bar Association (Former Co-Chairman of Rules and Procedures Committee)
    Milford/Ansonia, Connecticut and American Bar Associations
    State of Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commissioner appointed by Governor John G. Rowland, 1996 - 1997
    State of Connecticut Attorney Trial Referee, 1997 - present
    State of Connecticut Factfinder/Arbitrator appointed by Chief Justice Robert Callahan and Chief Administrative Judge Aaron Ment
    1997 - present
    Member Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association
    Member Connecticut Defense Lawyers Association
    Member Association Trial Lawyers of America.

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Bridgeport
    JD
    1982, University of Arizona Workers Compensation College
    Other Education
    Nichols College
    Class of 1978
    BS
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1956
    Bridgeport, Connecticut, May 5, 1956

Email Thomas G Cotter

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions