×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Paul T. Tusch
Pro

Paul T. Tusch

4.7
4 reviews

1111 Summer Street, 3rd Floor, Stamford, CT 06905

Family Law and Real Property

About Paul T. Tusch

Recipient, Moot Court Award, 1983. Staff Member, 1983-1984 and Notes and Comments Editor, 1984-1985, University of Bridgeport Law Review. Author: "Equitable Estoppel, Laches and Waiver Defenses in Alimony and Support Arrearage Proceedings," Connecticut Family Lawyer, Summer 1995. "Meaningful Relief for Taxpayers Selling Real Estate," Connecticut Law Tribune, March 2, 1998; "The Art of Appraising the Marital Residence," Connecticut Law Tribune, April 6, 1998. Corporate Secretary and Board Member, First Night Stamford, 1987-1991. Member, Board of Directors: Stamford Federal Little League, 1992-1995. Member, Board of Directors, 1993-1999, Vice Chairman, 1994-1996 and Chairman, 1996-1999, Stamford Chapter, American Red Cross. Member, Board of Directors and Secretary, Teen Life Center, 1994-2001. Special Master, Connecticut Superior Court Regional Family Trial Docket, 1995—. Member, Board of Directors, 1996— and First Vice President, 2000-2002, President, 2002-2004, The Volunteer Center of Southwestern Fairfield County. General Chairman, Connecticut Yankee Council BSA (Boys Scout of America), Greater Stamford Tribute Award Luncheon, 2001-2002. Class Chairman, Our Promise the Campaign for Fairfield University, 2001-2002. Member and Corporate Secretary, Board of Directors, Stamford Youth Foundation, 2004—. Member, Board of Directors, 2006—, and President, 2007—, North Stamford Little League.

 

Paul T. Tusch (Stamford, Connecticut) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Paul T. Tusch got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Paul T.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.7
See All Reviews
4
3.0
Lawyers.com
2
5.0
Martindale
1
5.0
Avvo
1
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
50%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
50%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
3.0
Quality of Service
3.0
Responsiveness
3.0
Value for Money
3.0
Family Law
Posted by anonymous
January 08, 2021
Hired Attorney

I was recently referred to Paul by another local attorney that I trust. Paul understood my concerns and knew exactly how to handle the case. He is easy to talk to and genuinely cares about the outcome. I would recommend him to anyone looking for a competent attorney.

Family Law
Posted by Robert
January 12, 2026
Hired Attorney

It was a mistake to appoint Attorney Paul Tusch as Guardian ad Litem for our daughter. During the entirety of his appointment, he spent approximately 23 minutes meeting with her. His billing rate was $700 per hour. His involvement concluded after serious concerns arose regarding the scope and quality of his work, ultimately resulting in the filing of a statewide grievance complaint. Based on my experience, I do not believe the level of engagement or diligence met the expectations required when representing the interests of a minor child.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Other 1
    • Real Property

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Cacace, Tusch & Santagata
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Maze v. City of Stamford, 228 Conn. 915, 636 A.2d 847 (1993)
    Newbury Commons Ltd. Partnership v. City of Stamford, 226 Conn. 92, 626 A.2d 1292 (1993)
    Connecticut Health Facilities, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Stamford, 29 Conn. App. 1, 613 A.2d 1358 (1992)
    Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 83 F. Supp.2d 306 (D. Conn. 2000)
  • Additional Links
    http://www.lawcts.com/attorney/paul-t-tusch/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1985, Connecticut
    1986, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
    Memberships
    Fairfield County Bar Association (Member, Executive Committee, 1990-1994
    Co-Chairman, Real Estate Committee, 1994-1999
    Chairman, Law Day Committee, 1990). Connecticut Bar Association (Vice Chairman, Lower Fairfield County Young Lawyers Section, 1988-1989
    Family Law Section Executive Committee Member, 1993—, Treasurer, 2000-2001, Secretary, 2001-2002, Chair, Continuing Legal Education, 2002-2003
    Vice Chair, 2003-2004 and Chair, 2004-2005
    Member, Real Property Section and Planning and Zoning Section).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Bridgeport School of Law
    Class of 1985
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Fairfield University
    Class of 1982
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1960
    Bridgeport, Connecticut, August 30, 1960

Email Paul T. Tusch

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Paul T. Tusch was admitted in 1985 to the State of Connecticut.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Paul T. Tusch is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Cacace, Tusch & Santagata has 8 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Paul T. Tusch attended University of Bridgeport School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.