×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Ross & Voytas, LLCMember
Nathan Earl Ross

Nathan Earl Ross

Not yet reviewed

12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 370, St. Louis, MO 63131-3630

Banking, Business Law, Consumer Protection and 11 more

About Nathan Earl Ross

Nathan Earl Ross is a lawyer practicing banking, business law, consumer protection and 11 other areas of law. Nathan Earl received a B.A. degree from Westminster College, and has been licensed for 25 years. Nathan Earl practices at Ross & Voytas, LLC in St. Louis, MO.

Nathan Earl Ross (St. Louis, Missouri)

Reviews for Nathan Earl

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate 1
    • Commercial Real Estate
  • Commercial Law
  • Construction Law
  • Contracts
  • Debtor and Creditor
  • Leases and Leasing
  • Litigation
  • Property Law
  • Other 3
    • Banking
    • Consumer Protection
    • Traffic Law

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Ross & Voytas, LLC

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2001, Missouri
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Illinois
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Missouri
    2002, Illinois
    Memberships
    Missouri Bar Association
    Illinois Bar Association
    Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    J.D.
    Top Ten Oralist
    Other Education
    Westminster College
    B.A.
    Magna Cum Laude

    Westminster College
    B.A.
    Alpha Chi National Scholarship Honor Society

    Westminster College
    Class of 1998
    Magna Cum Laude

    Westminster College
    Class of 1998
    Alpha Chi National Scholarship Honor Society

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Top Ten Oralist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Top Ten Oralist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Top Ten Oralist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Top Ten Oralist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Top Ten Oralist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Top Ten Oralist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Coif

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    National Moot Court Competition - Best Brief

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Quarter-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Regional Moot Court Team

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Mock Trial Competition-Finalist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Top Ten Oralist

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Class of 2001
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Order of the Barristers

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Law Review

    University of Missouri, Columbia
    Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1975
    St. Louis, Missouri, October 16, 1975

Nathan Earl Ross

Member at Ross & Voytas, LLC
Not yet reviewed

12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 370St. Louis, MO 63131-3630U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Sean P. Clancy
Pro
Sean P. Clancy
4.9
12
Banking Law lawyer

Free Consultation

314-710-2914
View Profile
Richard Brian Hein
Pro
Richard Brian Hein
4.4
26
Banking Law lawyer

Free Consultation

314-944-2954
View Profile
Fortis M. Lawder
Pro
Fortis M. Lawder
5.0
1
Banking Law lawyer

Free Consultation

314-561-7108
View Profile
Carl C. Lang
Pro
Carl C. Lang
5.0
1
Banking Law lawyer

Free Consultation

314-282-4660
View Profile
James Kerr Schleiffarth
Pro
James Kerr Schleiffarth
5.0
12
Banking Law lawyer

Free Consultation

557-201-2414
View Profile

Email Nathan Earl Ross

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions