×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Sorling NorthrupShare Holder
John Alan Kauerauf

John Alan Kauerauf

Not yet reviewed

1 North Old State Capitol Plaza, P.O. Box 5131, Springfield, IL 62705

Labor and Employment Law, Business Law, Real Estate Taxation and 3 more

About John Alan Kauerauf

John Alan Kauerauf is a lawyer practicing labor and employment law, business law, real estate taxation and 3 other areas of law. John received a B.A. degree from Illinois Wesleyan University in 1983, and has been licensed for 40 years. John practices at Sorling Northrup in Springfield, IL.

John Alan Kauerauf (Springfield, Illinois)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

John Alan Kauerauf got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for John

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Health Care
  • Other 3
    • Labor and Employment Law
    • Real Estate Taxation
    • Nonprofit and Tax Exempt Organizations

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Sorling Northrup
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Osborne v. Kelly, 207 Ill App 3d 488, 565 NE 2d 1340, 152 Ill Dec 422, (4th Dist., 1991)
    Yates v. Salvation Army, 1993 ILHUM LEXIS 194,402 (1993)
    Kralman v. Ill. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, 23 F.3d 150 (7th Cir. 1994)
    Castle v. Ill. Vet. Home at Manteno, 1995 ILHUM LEXIS 751, 753 (1995)
    Creasey v. Phillips Brothers, Inc., 1995 ILHUM LEXIS 621 (1995)
    Davis v. Hardee's, 1995 ILHUM LEXIS 266,595 (1995)
    Legg v. Ill. Vet. Home at Manteno, 1995 ILHUM LEXIS 165 (1995)
    Williams v. Franklin Life Insurance Co., 1998 ILHUM LEXIS 151 (1998)
    Woollen v. Perkins Family Restaurant, 1999 ILHUM LEXIS 11 (1999)
    Marshall v. Hardee's, 2000 ILHUM LEXIS 148 (2000)
    Sims v. Pinnacle Limited Partnership, 2002 ILHUM LEXIS 42 (2002)
    Dawkins v. Ill. Comm. College Bd., 2003 ILHUM LEXIS 13 (2003)
    Wiley v. Ill. Dept. of Veterans' Affairs, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1192 (7th Cir. 2004)
    Brummett v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. 414 F 3d 686 (7th Cir. 2005)
    Hawkins v. Macon Resources, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 30408 (C.D. IL. 2005)
    Byars v. Macon resources, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. Lexis 15678 (C.D. IL 2006)
    Cruz v. Macon Resources, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. Lexis 70080 (C.D. IL 2006)
    Bell v. Egizii Electric, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis 44700 (C.D. IL 2007)
    Yost v. Memorial Medical Center, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 107776 (C.D. IL 2009)
    Turner v. Memorial Medical Center, 233 Ill 2d 494 (2009)
    Williams v. Macon Resources, Inc., 2010 U.S. App Lexis 2031 (7th Cir 2010)
    Boston v. Memorial Medical Center, 2010 U.S. App Lexis 7686 (7th Cir 2010)
    Hatmaker v. Memorial Medical Center, 2010 U.S. App Lexis 18098 (7th Cir 2010).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1986, Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    Sangamon County (Secretary-Treasurer, 1991, Vice President, 1992, President, 1993, Young Lawyers Section, Board of Directors, 1995-1996)
    Illinois State and American Bar Associations
    Illinois Association of Healthcare Attorneys.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Illinois
    Class of 1986
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Illinois Wesleyan University
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1961
    Springfield, Illinois, July 3, 1961

Email John Alan Kauerauf

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions