×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo
Pro

Heather Myer

Not yet reviewed

1 Unknown, Speonk, NY 11972

Workers Compensation and Section 32 Negotiations

About Heather Myer

Heather Myer, an associate with Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano, LLP, has been fighting for the rights of workers since 2008.  Heather is a graduate of Hofstra University and earned her Juris Doctorate degree from The Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center at Touro College in New York.

Heather is an active member of The Brooklyn Bar Association, The Women's Brooklyn Bar Association, and The American Association for Justice. She regularly lectures on workers’ compensation law to various labor organizations.

Professional Associations and Memberships

• Brooklyn Women's Bar Association

• Brooklyn Bar Association

• American Association for Justice

 

Reviews for Heather

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Workers Compensation
  • Other 1
    • Section 32 Negotiations

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2008, New York
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    The Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Centerat Touro College
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Hofstra University

Contact Heather Myer

Associate
Not yet reviewed

1 UnknownSpeonk, NY 11972U.S.A.

Show on map
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions