×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Bullivant Houser Bailey PCAttorney
no photo

Wilhelm Dingler

Not yet reviewed

1700 7th Ave., Ste. 1810, Seattle, WA 98101-1397

Civil Litigation, Insurance, Litigation and 3 more

About Wilhelm Dingler

Wilhelm Dingler is a lawyer practicing civil litigation, insurance, litigation and 3 other areas of law. Wilhelm received a B.A. degree from University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana in 1980, and has been licensed for 42 years. Wilhelm practices at Bullivant Houser Bailey PC in Seattle, WA.

Wilhelm Dingler (Seattle, Washington)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Wilhelm Dingler got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Wilhelm Dingler

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Insurance
  • Professional Liability
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Other 1
    • Malpractice

Practice Details

  • Languages
    German
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Bullivant Houser Bailey PC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Representative Matters: Engaged by a prominent national insurer to represent a group of Texas accountants in a multi-million dollar lawsuit venued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Successfully resolved the matter within the limited amount of coverage available
    was able to insulate clients from substantial excess verdict exposure.
    Acted as co-counsel in an adversary proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Was instrumental in securing a complete defense verdict on behalf of a Philadelphia law firm after a bench trial, which consumed 20 days over the better part of four months.
    Wilhelm won the first case he ever took to trial. He was representing the defendant, the State of Washington
    Bellingham County. The plaintiff appealed to the intermediate appellate court. The appellate court ruled 2-1 in the plaintiffs favor. Wilhelm appealed to the Washington Supreme Court
    convinced the justices to rule 9-0 in favor of his clients.
    Published Works: Another Arrow in the Defense Quiver, Agents of America, E&O Weekly Prevention, October 4, 2012
    The IRS, QuickBooks
    You, Of Mutual Interest, July 2012
    Remember Risk Management With Adoption of New Work Paradigms, Pennsylvania CPA Journal, Vol. 80, No. 1, p. 16, Spring, 2009
    In Bad Economy, Protect Yourself from Portfolio Collapse Lawsuits, Pennsylvania CPA Journal, Vol. 79, No. 3, p. 14, Fall, 2008
    Top Ten Trouble Spots: Will We Ever Learn?, Pennsylvania CPA Journal, Vol. 78, No. 4, Winter 2008, pp. 12-13
    Confronting the Inevitable Blame Game, Pennsylvania CPA Journal, Vol 79, No. 2, Summer 2008, p. 14
    Mind the Gap in Liability Coverage, Pennsylvania CPA Journal, Volume 77, No. 4, Winter, 2007
    Never Slack on Security, Pennsylvania CPA Journal, Volume 77, No. 3, Fall, 2006
    The Benefits of Advice: One Step to a Better Night's Sleep, The Asset Column, Winter, 2000
    Experience Begets Advice, The Asset Column, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1999
    Fact
    Fiction of Mediation
    the Accountant: A Case Study, Pennsylvania CPA Journal, Vol. 68, No. 4, Winter, 1998
    Claims Made
    Reported: A View from the Top, The Asset Column, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1997

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1983, Washington
    1983, U.S. District Court Western District of Washington
    1984, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Washington
    1990, U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit
    2014, U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania
    2005, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    2008, U.S. Tax Court
    2008, U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit
    2005, Pennsylvania
    Memberships

    Associations & Memberships

    •Order of the Barrister
    •Professional Liability Underwriting Society (PLUS)
    •Washington State Bar Association, Committee of Law Examiners

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    J.D.
    1983 First Place

    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    J.D.
    National Appellate Advocacy Moot Court Competition

    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    J.D.
    Order of the Barristers
    Other Education
    University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana
    Class of 1980
    B.A.
    American Studies

    University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana
    Class of 1980
    B.A.
    Modern Languages

    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    cum laude

    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    1983 First Place

    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    National Appellate Advocacy Moot Court Competition

    University of Toledo College of Law, Toledo, Ohio
    Order of the Barristers

Wilhelm Dingler

Attorney at Bullivant Houser Bailey PC
Not yet reviewed

1700 7th Ave., Ste. 1810Seattle, WA 98101-1397U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Craig Steven Sternberg
Pro
Craig Steven Sternberg
5.0
9
Civil Litigation lawyer
206-590-9701
View Profile
Jeffrey M. Sayre
Pro
Jeffrey M. Sayre
4.8
25
Civil Litigation lawyer
206-775-8540
View Profile
William J. Bender
Pro
William J. Bender
5.0
1
Civil Litigation lawyer
206-594-0712
View Profile
Christopher Pitts
Pro
Christopher Pitts
4.3
23
Civil Litigation lawyer
206-934-1810
View Profile
Justin G Elsner
Pro
Justin G Elsner
5.0
17
Civil Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

206-703-0399
View Profile

Email Wilhelm Dingler

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions