×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Meagher + Geer, P.L.L.P.Partner
Kurt M. Zitzer
Pro

Kurt M. Zitzer

5.0
29 reviews

16767 North Perimeter Drive, Suite 210, Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Commercial Litigation, Construction, Products Liability and 8 more

About Kurt M. Zitzer

Mr. Zitzer is a litigation attorney who practices out of the firm’s Chicago, Illinois and Phoenix, Arizona offices, and is a leader of the firm serving on its Management Committee. He serves as the Practice Chair for the firm’s Commercial Litigation and Professional Liability practice groups. Kurt was recently honored by his peers by being selected once again as one of the Top 50 attorneys in the Southwest by Southwest Super Lawyers list. He is also included in the Illinois Super Lawyers list. Additionally, AzBusiness magazine recently selected Kurt as one of Arizona’s top 100 lawyers and a top 10 lawyer in the area of Employee Benefits and Insurance Law. Kurt is also included in The Best Lawyers in America in the areas of Insurance Law and Products Liability Litigation - Defense. He has twice been named by Best Lawyers as its Scottsdale “Lawyer of the Year” for insurance law, in 2026 and in 2019. He is also a Senior fellow in the Litigation Counsel of America-an invitation-only honor society that limits its membership to the top 0.5 percent of trial lawyers. Kurt is a member of the Trial Law Institute and Diversity Law Institute. His practice focuses on writing coverage opinions for a wide variety of insurance product lines. When these positions are disputed, he defends them.

“The cases I enjoy most are those that derive from one-of-a-kind commercial insurance policies-cases that present brand-new issues to the courts and create new law.”

He has defended commercial insurance cases in 14 states-in mediation, arbitration, litigation, on trial and on appeal. Kurt also has experience serving as an arbitrator in private arbitrations involving insurance coverage disputes, and as an expert witness involving coverage and bad faith claims.

Kurt also engages in reinsurance coverage opinion writing, mediation and arbitration-focusing primarily on facultative reinsurance agreements for property and casualty insurers.

In addition to insurance coverage and commercial litigation, he defends clients-especially lawyers and accountants-faced with professional liability claims. He represents accountants confronted with disciplinary proceedings and malpractice claims, as well as other professionals in the fields of architecture, engineering, real estate and insurance. As an active member of the Professional Liability Underwriting Society, Kurt regularly speaks at this group’s seminars on emerging issues in professional liability.

Kurt’s practice includes the defense of product liability claims involving the manufacturing, distribution and sale of vehicles and their component parts, small machinery, household products, HVAC equipment, construction materials and other consumer products. He has successfully defended serious bodily injury and wrongful death claims as well as property damage claims in Arizona and other jurisdictions. He has resolved suits through trial, arbitration, motion practice and mediated settlement, and Kurt is regularly called upon to defend the interests of those companies accused of manufacturing, distributing or selling a dangerous or defective product.

Kurt also represents real estate developers, with a focus on projects that include hospitality, medical and professional office buildings. He uses his knowledge of insurance coverage to advise clients on risk management issues-including procurement of insurance and drafting of construction contracts.

“Before I became a lawyer, I ran a small business, so I understand that legal issues are just one of the many concerns faced by business owners. I take great pleasure in helping them successfully resolve a conflict, so they can get on with their lives and their business.”

Kurt maintains close ties with his colleagues in the business community via his active involvement with the Scottsdale Chamber of Commerce, where he serves as Board Chair. Outside of the office, Kurt enjoys family activities, sports, coaching, travel and skating with other “over the hill” ice hockey players in local recreational leagues.

Kurt was profiled in the April/May 2010 issue of Scottsdale@Work .

Accolades

•Senior fellow, Litigation Counsel of America, (A trial lawyer honorary society, with membership limited to one-half of one percent of American lawyers, and by invitation only)
•Barrister, Order of Veritas and Order of Certus, Litigation Counsel of America
•fellow, American Bar Foundation (Membership is limited to one percent of the lawyers admitted to practice in each jurisdiction of the United States, by invitation)
•Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers of America in the areas of Insurance Law and Product Liability Litigation-Defendants (2015-2026)
•Named by Best Lawyers as a 2026 Insurance Law 'Lawyer of the Year' in Scottsdale
•Named by Best Lawyers as a 2019 Insurance Law 'Lawyer of the Year' in Scottsdale
•Named by AZ Business magazine (January/February 2025 issue) as a Top 100 Lawyer in commercial litigation and professional liability (2025)
•Named by AZ Business magazine (January/February 2024 issue) as a Top 100 Lawyer in commercial litigation and professional liability (2024)
•Awarded the Platinum Client Champion award by Martindale-Hubbell, a top award that recognizes attorneys who excel at service and representation as affirmed by their clients (2017-2025)
•Awarded the highest possible Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, AV Preeminent (AV is a registered certification mark of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies)
•Named to the Illinois Super Lawyers list (2021-2025)
•Named to Southwest Super Lawyers Top 50 list (2013-2020, 2023-2025)
•Named to Southwest Super Lawyers list (2012-2025)
•Named by AZ Business magazine (March/April 2019 issue) as a Top 100 Lawyer in insurance coverage, commercial litigation, and professional liability (2019)
•Named by AzBusiness Leaders Magazine as a Business Leader in Insurance Law (2018, 2019)
•Named by AZ Business magazine (March/April 2017 issue) as a Top 100 Lawyer in insurance coverage, commercial litigation, and professional liability (2017)
•Named by AZ Business magazine (March/April 2016 issue) as a Top 100 Lawyer in insurance coverage, commercial litigation, and professional liability (2016)
•Named by AZ Business magazine (March/April 2015 issue) as a Top Lawyer in Insurance (2015)
•Named by AZ Business magazine (March/April 2014 issue) as a Top Lawyer in Insurance (2014)
•Selected as one of Arizona's Finest Lawyers (2011)
•America’s Most Honored Lawyers 2020 - Top 1% by American Registry
•Association of Trial Lawyers of America (2006)
•Former Editor-in-Chief of The John Marshall Law Review

Speaking Engagements

•Defense Research Institute (DRI) Insurance Coverage and Practice Symposium, New York, New York, The Coverage Side of Claims-Made Professional Liability Policies (December 2019)
•Claims Litigation Management (CLM) Construction Community Webinar, Significant Construction Defect Litigation and CD Coverage Decisions for 2017 (January 2018)
•Claims Litigation Management (CLM) Construction Community Webinar, Construction Claims - Case Law and Statutory Updates (October 2017)
•State Bar of Arizona CLE, Arizona Tort Law Handbook Seminar, Phoenix, Arizona, Design Professional Liability (June 2013)
•Defense Research Institute (DRI) Insurance Coverage and Practice Symposium, New York, New York, Hot Issues in Professional Liability Coverage: Lessons from the DRI Compendium (December 2012)
•State Bar of Arizona CLE, Bad Faith Insurance Law Seminar, Phoenix, Arizona, Third-Party Bad Faith (August 2012)
•Panelist on the subject of legal ethics, malpractice and risk management for law firms, Arizona State Bar Annual Convention (June 2012)
•The Defense and Indemnity of Claims in Arizona, Navigators Group of Companies, San Francisco, California (August 2010)
•Arizona State Bar CLE by the Sea in Scottsdale, Arizona, Ethical Considerations for Law Firm Management (June 2010)
•Arizona State Bar CLE by the Sea in San Diego, California, Minding the Store, Internal Ethics and Liability Management (July 2009)
•Hot Topics in Professional Liability Insurance: Electronic Data and Bad Faith, Professional Liability Underwriting Society in Denver, Colorado (April 2008)

Publications

•Quoted, “Ga. Tort Reform Promises Relief From Insurance Industry Ills” Law360 (April 10, 2025)
•Quoted, “2nd Circ. Insurer Win Stirs Fears Over Mixed Coverage Claims” Law360 (October 25, 2023)
•Quoted, “2nd Circ. Coverage Chain Ruling Marks Risk-Transfer Woes” Law360 (May 23, 2023)
•'When Claims and Potential Claims May Intersect in Claims Made Coverage' Covered Events, DRI Newsletter of the Insurance Law Committee (March 2020)
•'The 'Insured v. Insured' Exclusion as Applied in Bankruptcy' Covered Events, DRI Newsletter of the Insurance Law Committee (March 2017)
•Co-author for Arizona section, 'Professional Liability Insurance: A Compendium of State Law' published by the Defense Research Institute (October 2012)
•Co-author, Chapter on Design Professional Liability, Arizona Tort Law Handbook, published by the State Bar of Arizona (2012) 'Continuous Impact' Best's Review 82 (June 2005)

News

•Aug 21, 2025
Meagher + Geer Partner Kurt Zitzer earns Best Lawyers 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” distinction
•Aug 21, 2025
Meagher + Geer congratulates its 23 attorneys recognized by Best Lawyers in 2026
•Apr 17, 2025
Southwest Super Lawyers names three Meagher + Geer partners to 2025 list

Events

•Nov
10 - 12,
2025

2025 Professional Liability Underwriting Society (PLUS) Conference Meagher + Geer is a proud sponsor
•Sep
14 - 16,
2022

Professional Liability Defense Federation (PLDF) 2022 Annual Meeting Meagher + Geer is a proud sponsor of the PLDF 2022 Annual Meeting
•Dec 5, 2019
DRI Insurance Coverage and Practice Symposium Partner Kurt Zitzer co-presents 'The Coverage Side of Claims-Made Professional Liability Policies'

Articles

•Mar 6, 2020
When Claims and Potential Claims May Intersect in Claims Made Coverage

By Kurt Zitzer for Covered Events

•Apr 18, 2019
Amendments to Arizona's Purchaser Dwelling Act Signed Into Law

Construction Law Update by Kurt Zitzer

•Apr 7, 2017
The “Insured v. Insured” Exclusion as Applied in Bankruptcy

DRI Covered Events newsletter

 

Kurt M. Zitzer (Scottsdale, Arizona) View website

Awards

Platinum Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 10 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.5 or higher.
Champion Badge Platinum
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Kurt M. Zitzer got this award in 2021

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Kurt M. Zitzer got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Kurt M. Zitzer

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
29
5.0
Lawyers.com
12
5.0
Martindale
17
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-10 of 12 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
92%
4 stars
8%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
4.9
Construction Law
Posted by anonymous
May 21, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Extremely helpful in all areas, sincere in working toward the well being of all involved in every area he is working on. Willing to go the extra mile in research. An all around good & honest attorney. I would recommend him to anyone.

Litigation
Posted by anonymous
May 21, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Kurt represented the insurance company that we are using and handled our interests as well as the insurance company's fairly.

Professional Liability
Posted by anonymous
May 21, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Mr. Zitzer is always available, when needed for advice. Quick with his responses and highly professional in his personal attitude.

Insurance
Posted by anonymous
May 20, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Kurt is a very experienced ethical aggressive attorney who communicates effectively and gets great results. Best attorney you can get for complicated issues.

Insurance
Posted by anonymous
May 20, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

A skilled, knowledgeable responsive, advocate. Excellent attorney

Construction Law
Posted by anonymous
May 20, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Kurt is always available and extremely responsive with excellent council.

Construction Law
Posted by anonymous
May 20, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Very competent and easy to work. Focused on client needs and desires and understands need to have value for service in driving an outcome.

Litigation
Posted by anonymous
May 20, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Kurt Zitzer is as pleasant personally as he is brilliant. He is an excellent attorney and I feel privileged to be a client of his.

Insurance
Posted by anonymous
May 20, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer

Excellent attorney. Always very professional.

Insurance
Posted by anonymous
June 03, 2010
Hired Attorney Kurt M. Zitzer
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Products Liability
  • Insurance
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 7
    • Construction
    • Corporate/Business Services
    • Employment
    • Insurance - Bad Faith
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Insurance - Reinsurance
    • Securities and Financial Services

Practice Details

  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    Zoom
    Skype
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Meagher + Geer, P.L.L.P.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Recent Decisions: Geurden v. Quantum Transportation, et al ., ___F.Supp.3d ___, 2018 WL 1522481 (D.Ariz. 2018) (insurance carrier not bound by purported Damron Agreement for $25 million since the carrier did not actually breach the duty to defend
    the anticipatory breach of policy obligations cannot be the predicate for a Damron Agreement).
    Cantex, Inc. v. Giles Engineering Assocs., Inc., 2017 WL XXXXXX (Ariz. App. 2017) (vacating summary judgment
    $100,000 award of attorney fees, holding that Arizona's law of comparative fault does not render apportioned claim one for sole negligence within an exception to an indemnity clause,
    ordering summary judgment be entered in favor of engineering firm client on contractual defense
    indemnity claim in excess of $500,000).
    Colony Insurance Company v. Estate of Lakeisha Anderson, 2016 WL 796983 (Ariz. App. 2016) (holding that $2.2 million judgment against insured group home for death of resident fell outside the coverage of claims-made-
    -reported policy in effect at time of death because claim was not reported during the policy period, further, death fell outside the coverage of the second claims-made-
    -reported policy given the retroactive date).
    Nelson v. Navigator Insurance Company, 624 Fed.Appx. 599 (9th Cir. 2015) (holding that general liability insurer did not provide coverage for $4.2 million judgment on spoliation of evidence suit under CGL Policy
    Excess Policy because spoliation of evidence is for economic loss, not bodily injury or property damage,
    the Insured's subjective expectation of coverage for the suit did not rise to the level of objective reasonableness under the evidence presented).
    Catlin Specialty Ins. Co. v. Parks Industries, et al ., ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, 2015 WL 300625 (N.D. Ill., January 21, 2015) (summary judgment for Catlin finding no coverage under successive commercial general liability policies for claims involving allegedly defective auxiliary power units the Insured manufactured for installation on semi-trailer trucks to operation climate control
    other functions, holding that claim did not involving an occurrence causing property damage ).
    S P Syntax, LLC v. XL Specialty Ins. Co., et al, CV 2011-019071 Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona (January 7, 2014) (summary judgment in favor of excess D & O insurer client wherein court found that Tower 2 coverage side A excess policy was not required to drop down
    provide primary coverage,
    that claim was otherwise excluded under Tower 2 based upon interrelated claim
    prior notice exclusion).
    Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, et al. v. Lewis, M.D., et al ., 898 F.Supp.2d 1132 (D.Ariz. 2012) (holding that general liability insurer did not have a duty to indemnify insured medical practice in eight underlying lawsuits for vicarious liability
    negligent hiring, supervision
    retention of cardiologist to the extent that the cardiologist groped
    fondled the breasts of his female patients because such conduct,
    all derivative theories of liability arising from such conduct, fell within the professional services exclusion).
    Czapski v. Maher, 954 N.E.2d 237 (Ill.App. 1st Dist. 2011) (holding that a test driver of an automobile is a customer within meaning of policy exclusion that customers do not qualify as insureds under $5 million dollar commercial umbrella policy,
    holding that client had no duty to indemnify any part of a $13.7 million dollar wrongful death verdict)
    Phillips & Associates, P.C. v. Navigators Ins. Co ., 764 F. Supp. 2d 1174, 2011 WL 537509 (D. Ariz., February 11, 2011) (finding that subject to a determination of no coverage, a carrier has the right to recovery from the insured defense
    indemnity payments so long as carrier properly reserves those rights)
    Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty Ins. Co., 226 Ariz. 297, 247 P.3d 180 (Ariz.App. 2011) (court restricts the use of Morris agreements
    finds insureds who enter into such agreements to the benefit of one carrier
    to the detriment of another carrier violate the policy's cooperation clause)
    Goble, et al. v. Beckwith, et al., No. CV2008-051863 (Maricopa County Sup. Ct., Ariz., Dec. 2, 2010) (holding that legal malpractice claims are barred by the statute of limitations because plaintiffs knew or should have known of the damages they sustained as a result of the alleged malpractice more than two years before filing suit)
    College Book Centers, Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners' Association, 225 Ariz. 533, 241 P.3d 897 (App. 2010) (reversing jury verdict against association that it had waived right to enforce CC&R's
    ruling that implied easement claim failed as a matter of law)
    Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Jones, 695 F.Supp.2d 978 (D.Ariz. 2010) (motor vehicle exclusion precluded coverage for ATV accident on public street)
    Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Market Finders Ins. Corp., 2009 WL 5125771 (9th Cir. 2009) (reinstating cause of action for professional negligence against managing general agent)
    Johnson v. Clarke, 2009 WL 3756332 (Ariz. App. 2009) (holding that legal malpractice was time barred by two-year statute of limitation)
    American Safety Cas. Ins. Co. v. City of Waukegan, 2009 WL 855795 (N.D. Ill. 2009) (granting summary judgment to carrier based upon insured's failure to timely tender defense of suit)
    Colony Ins. Co. v. Events Plus, Inc., 585 F.Supp.2d 1148 (D. Ariz. 2008) (granting summary judgment to carrier based upon liquor liability exclusion)
    National Cas. Co. v. Forge Indus. Staffing, Inc., 2008 WL 4874508 (N.D. Ill. 2008) (granting summary judgment to carrier holding that insured was not entitled to Peppers counsel)
    Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. City of Waukegan, 2007 WL 2740521 (N.D. Ill. 2007) (granting carrier's motion to dismiss claim of bad faith)
    Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church v. Church Mut. Ins. Co., 2006 WL 18488 (D. Ariz. 2006) (granting carrier's motion for summary judgment dismissing claim for bad faith)
  • Additional Links
    http://www.meagher.com/professionals/xprProfessionalDetailsMeagher.aspx?xpST=ProfessionalDetail&professional=22

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1990, Illinois
    1990, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    1992, Arizona
    1992, United States District Court, District of Arizona
    2006, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    2008, United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2010, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    2010, United States District Court, Southern District of Illinois
    2019, United States District Court, Central District of Illinois
    2019, United States District Court, District of Colorado
    2022, United States District Court, District of North Dakota
    Memberships

    Professional Affiliations

    •American Bar Association
    •State Bar of Arizona, Construction Law Section
    •Arizona Association of Defense Counsel
    •Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers
    •Claims & Litigation Management (CLM) Alliance
    •Illinois State Bar
    •Litigation Counsel of America, Senior fellow
    •Diversity Law Institute
    •Trial Law Institute
    •Scottsdale Chamber of Commerce, Chair, Board of Directors
    •Phoenix Chamber of Commerce
    •Professional Liability Defense Federation
    •Professional Liability Underwriting Society
    •Defense Research Institute
    •Insurance Law Committee
    •Chair, Professional Liability Subcommittee
    •Commercial General Liability
    •Commercial Litigation Committee
    •Construction Law Committee
    •Arizona Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, Affiliate Section Chairperson (2001- 2006)
    •The National Foundation for Women Legislators, Steering Committee (2005)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    The John Marshall Law School
    Class of 1990
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Trinity College
    Class of 1985
    B.A.

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Email Kurt M. Zitzer

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Kurt M. Zitzer was admitted in 1990 to the State of Illinois.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Kurt M. Zitzer is admitted to practice in Arizona and Illinois.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Kurt M. Zitzer has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Meagher + Geer, P.L.L.P. has 89 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Kurt M. Zitzer attended The John Marshall Law School.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions