Duane Morris LLPPartner

William Joseph Baron

About William Joseph Baron

William Joseph Baron is a lawyer practicing appellate practice, insurance, trial practice. William received a A.B. degree from Stanford University in 1980, and has been licensed for 42 years. William practices at Duane Morris LLP in San Francisco, CA.

Awards

Reviews for William Joseph Baron

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Insurance
Posted by anonymous
June 02, 2010
Hired Attorney William Joseph Baron

Very qualified and excellent to work with

Services

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Insurance
  • Other 1
    • Trial Practice

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Duane Morris LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: APL Co. v. Valley Forge Ins. Co., 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 20347 (9th Cir. Cal. Oct. 4, 2013)
    Briefed
    argued Ninth Circuit appeal from an adverse summary judgment ruling concerning an insurance claim for remediation costs. Obtained a reversal of the District Court's $1.6 million adverse judgment,
    the Ninth Circuit ordered judgment for the firm's clients.
    Starpoint U.S.A. v. DAEWOO Motor Co., Ltd. (Cal. Ct. App. May 22, 2013). Briefed
    argued an appeal from an adverse J.N.O.V.
    new trial order concerning the scope of a contractual indemnity provision. Obtained reversal of the trial court?s J.N.O.V. order,
    the California Court of Appeal ordered a new trial.
    Airis SFO, LLC v. The City
    County of San Francisco (California Court of Appeal, First District, Division One, unpublished opinion dated Sept. 22, 2010). Briefed
    argued an appeal from an adverse J.N.O.V.
    new trial order. Obtained reversal of the trial court's rulings,
    the California Court of Appeal reinstated a million dollar jury verdict in favor of a developer of air-cargo facilities against the City of San Francisco
    its airport.
    American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., et al. v. International Creative Management, et al. (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, order dated Sept. 10, 2010). Obtained a summary judgment order on behalf of insurers that required their insured to reimburse a $2.25 million settlement payment insurers had advanced to settle an underlying action age-discrimination action.
    Olin Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, et al. (2nd Cir. 2006) 468 F.3d 120. Briefed Second Circuit appeal from an adverse $25 million judgment entered after a jury trial concerning insurance coverage issues. Obtained reversal of the judgment,
    the Court of Appeals ordered a new trial.
    CreAgri, Inc. v. USANA Corp. (9th Cir. 2006) 474 F.3d 626. Briefed Ninth Circuit appeal concerning trademark infringement claims.
    Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Watts Industries, Inc. (7th Cir. 2005) 417 F.3d 682. Briefed Seventh Circuit appeal in which the Court of Appeals affirmed an order concerning a petition to compel arbitration
    rem
    ed certain issues to the district court.
    GATX Capital Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, et al. Retained to serve as appellate counsel before
    during trial of a complex action involving claims against aviation insurance policies. The case settled shortly before trial.
    Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. (2004) 90 P.3d 814. Briefed
    argued appeal in the Colorado Supreme Court, which addressed coverage issues involving the application of the pollution exclusion
    the scope of the duty to defend.
    Rosen v. State Farm General Ins. Co. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1070. Submitted an amicus curiae brief to the California Supreme Court, which reversed the Court of Appeal decision
    held that courts cannot override express insurance policy wordings for reasons of public policy.
    Gray v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (California Court of Appeal, First District, Division One, unpublished opinion dated July 17, 2002, review denied). Briefed appeal in which the Court affirmed judgment for insurers, ruling that a Judge's Professional Liability Policy did not apply to the claim in question.
    Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court(Powerine Oil Company) (2001) 24 Cal.4th 945, briefed appeal in the California Supreme Court, which affirmed summary adjudication for insurers, ruling that the term damages in liability insurance policies means money ordered by a court,
    does not permit coverage for the costs of complying with government orders.
    Alpha Therapeutic Corp. v. The Home Insurance Company, et al. (2001). Retained after an unfavorable appellate decision affirmed an adverse ten million dollar judgment. Submitted a petition for review to the California Supreme Court, which accepted review of the insurance coverage issues presented, including the question whether all sums allocation applies to an insurer?s duty to indemnify. The case settled after review was granted.
    Procter
    Companies v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (Santa Clara County Superior Court). In various orders between 1997
    2001, the trial court dismissed $600 million in indemnity claims
    $60 million in defense-cost claims on demurrer, summary adjudication,
    a pre-trial Cottle proceeding.
    Successful depublication requests in Melton v. Industrial Indemnity Co. (ordered depublished on May 2, 2001),
    Commercial Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (ordered published on February 14, 2001).
    Amicus curiae briefs in various other appeals
    writ proceedings, including Aydin Corp. v. First State Ins. Co. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1183,
    Travelers Casualty
    Insurance Co. v. Superior Court (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1440.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1983, California
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    2023, Washington
    Memberships

    Professional Activities

    •Certified Appellate Specialist by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Michigan Law School
    Class of 1983
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Stanford University
    Class of 1980
    A.B.
    with distinction
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1958
    1958

William Joseph Baron

Partner at Duane Morris LLP
5.0
1 review

One Market Plaza, Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94105U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

no photo
Pro
Cheryl C. Rouse
5.0
Appellate Practice lawyer
Debra R. Schoenberg
Pro
Debra R. Schoenberg
4.3
Appellate Practice lawyer
George William Wolff
Pro
George William Wolff
4.9
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Ron Funk
Pro
Ron Funk
4.9
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Stephen Allen Jamieson
Pro
Stephen Allen Jamieson
5.0
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: