×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Cera LLPPartner
Solomon Benjamin Cera
Pro

Solomon Benjamin Cera

5.0
1 review

595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA 94105

Complex Commercial Litigation, Antitrust, Securities and 4 more

About Solomon Benjamin Cera

Mr. Cera joined the Firm in 1983 and is its managing partner. While at the Firm, Mr. Cera has obtained experience in a variety of fields, including the oil and gas industry, executive compensation, insurance and tax-advantaged investments. In addition, Mr. Cera has obtained significant experience in the fields of mergers and acquisitions, accounting and auditing.

Publications: Author: "Control Person Liability of the Outside Director," Securities News, Vol. II No. 2, Winter 1993, American Bar Association, Section of Litigation, Committee on Securities Litigation. Reported Cases: In re Activision Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 92,397 (N.D. Cal. 1985); In re Activision Securities Litigation, 621 F.Supp. 415 (N.D. Cal. 1985); In re Activision Securities Litigation, 723 F.Supp. 1373 (N.D. Cal. 1989); Adobe Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 95,873 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Adobe Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,051 (N.D. Cal. 1991); In re ASK Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,991 (N.D. Cal. 1992); Businessland Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,059 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 95,874 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,198 (N.D. Cal. 1991); In re Consolidated Air West Securities Litigation, 73 F.R.D. 12 (N.D. Cal. 1977); In re Consolidated Capital Securities Litigation, (CCH) Fed.Sec.Rptr. 95,238 (N.D. Cal. 1990); In re Daisy Systems Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,190 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Desmond v. BankAmerica Corp.; Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 90,995 (N.D. Cal. 2000); In re Diasonics Securities Litigation, 599 F.Supp. 447 (N.D. Cal. 1984); Digital Microwave Corp. Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 97,044 (N.D. Cal. 1992); Duval v. Gleason, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,153 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Ezra Charitable Trust v. Rent-Way, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 435 (W.D. Pa. 2001); In re Fortune Systems Securities Litigation, 604 F.Supp. 150 (N.D. Cal. 1984); Gaillard v. Natomas Co., 173 Cal.App.3d 410 (1985); Gaillard v. Natomas, 208 Cal.App.3d 1250 (1989); In re Gap Stores Securities Litigation, 79 F.R.D. 283 (N.D. Cal. 1978); In re Granite Partners, L.P., 194 BR 318 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996); Green v. Occidental, 541 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1976); Green v. Aetna Healthcare, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12320 (N.D. Cal. 2000); Hudson v. Capital Management, Inc., 565 F.Supp. 615 (N.D. Cal. 1983); Hudson v. Capital Management Int'l., Inc., Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 99,221 (N.D. Cal. 1982); Hudson v. Capital Management Int'l., Inc., Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 99,222 (N.D. Cal. 1982); In re Itel Securities Litigation, 596 F.Supp. 226 (N.D. Cal. 1984); In re Itel Securities Litigation, 89 F.R.D. 104 (N.D. Cal. 1981); Joseph v. Wiles, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 91,036 (10th Cir. 2000); Joseph v. Wiles, 223 F.3d 1155 (10th Cir. 2000); In re Legato Systems Securities Litigation, 204 F.R.D. 167 (N.D. Cal. 2001); Lilley v. Charren, 936 F.Supp. 708 (N.D. Cal. 1996); Marshall v. Holiday Magic, 550 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1977); Masstor Systems Corporation Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 92,719 (N.D. Cal. 1986); McFarland v. Memorex Corp., 581 F.Supp. 878 (N.D. Cal. 1984); In re Memorex Securities Case, 61 F.R.D. 88 (N.D. Cal. 1973); Rogers v. NationsCredit Financial Services Corp.; Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) 77,918 (N.D. Cal. 1999); In re Nucorp Energy Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 99,158 (S.D. Cal. 1983); In re Nucorp Energy Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 93,224 (S.D. Cal. 1987); In re Pizza Time Theatre Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 92,537 (N.D. Cal. 1986); Primavera Familienstiftung v. Askin, 173 F.R.D. 115 (S.D.N.Y. 1997); Primavera Familienstiftung v. Askin, 130 F.Supp 2d 450 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); In re Rent-Way Securities Litigation, 209 F.Supp.2d 493 (2002); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 94,393 (N.D.Cal. 1989); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 94,394 (N.D.Cal. 1989); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 95,430 (N.D.Cal. 1990); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 95,431 (N.D. Cal. 1990); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,094 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,095 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,221 (N.D. Cal. 1991); Roberts v. Heim, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 96,970 (N.D. Cal. 1992); Roberts v. Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co., 857 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1988); In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, 232 F.R.D. 346 (N.D. Cal. 2005); In re Seagate Technology II Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 97,028 (N.D. Cal. 1992); In re Sonus Networks Securities Litigation, 247 F.R.D. 244 (D. Mass. 2007); In re Technical Equities Federal Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 94,093 (N.D. Cal. 1988); In re Victor Technologies Securities Litigation, 102 F.R.D. 53 (N.D. Cal. 1984); In re Victor Technologies Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 93,158 (N.D. Cal. 1987); In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation, 35 F.3d 1407 (9th Cir. 1994); In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation, 721 F.Supp. 1140 (N.D. Cal. 1989); In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 95,004 (N.D. Cal. 1990); In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation, 694 F.Supp. 1427 (N.D. Cal. 1988); In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 97,041 (N.D. Cal. 1992); In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation, Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) 97,018 (N.D. Cal. 1992); Zatkin v. Primuth, 551 F.Supp. 39 (S.D. Cal. 1982); Zell v. Intercapital Income Securities, Inc., 675 F.2d 1041 (9th Cir. 1982). Speaking Engagements: Speaker, "Competition and Global Consolidations," American Bar Association, Forum on Air and Space Law, 1998 Annual Meeting and Conference. Awards & Recognition: Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award in Corporations.

 

Solomon Benjamin Cera (San Francisco, California) View website

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Solomon Benjamin Cera got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Solomon Benjamin Cera

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Securities
  • Professional Liability 2
    • Accountants Liability
    • Directors and Officers Liability
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Competition
  • Other 3
    • Complex Commercial Litigation
    • Antitrust
    • Limited Partnerships

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1981, California
    1981, U.S. District Court, Northern, Central, Southern and Eastern Districts of California, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    The State Bar of California
    American (Member, Section on Litigation) Bar Association
    The Association of Trial Lawyers of America (Member, Section on Litigation).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of San Francisco
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Pomona College
    Class of 1978
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1956
    Winnipeg, Canada, October 23, 1956

Contact Solomon Benjamin Cera

Partner at Cera LLP
5.0
1 review

595 Market Street, Suite 2300San Francisco, CA 94105U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (415) 777-5189
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Tuesday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Wednesday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Thursday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Friday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM

Email Solomon Benjamin Cera

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Solomon Benjamin Cera has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Cera LLP has 10 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Solomon Benjamin Cera attended University of San Francisco.
  • Does this attorney maintain any other responsibilities in the firm outside of legal work?
    Solomon Benjamin Cera is the Managing Partner of the firm.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions