×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPAssociate
no photo
Pro

Noah M. Woo

Not yet reviewed

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000, San Francisco, CA 94111-5983

Labor & Employment, Wage & Hour Class and Collective Litigation, Employment Litigation & Trials and 1 more

About Noah M. Woo

Noah M. Woo focuses on labor and employment litigation and counseling matters. He represents employers in state and federal courts, handling wage and hour class actions, including Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) cases, and single-plaintiff cases involving wrongful termination, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, denial of accommodations and leaves, and wage and hour violations.

Noah provides employment advice and counseling services to personnel at companies of various sizes, from small startups to large corporations. His work includes reviewing employment handbooks, policies, and procedures for compliance, as well as collaborating with executive members and human resources personnel to address various employment matters.

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, “Ones to Watch,” Labor and Employment Law - Management, 2026
•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Northern California Super Lawyers, “Rising Stars,” 2024

 

Noah M. Woo (San Francisco, California) View website

Reviews for Noah M.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 4
    • Labor & Employment
    • Wage & Hour Class and Collective Litigation
    • Employment Litigation & Trials
    • Workplace Compliance & Counseling

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Korean
    Conversational
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Defeated class certification in wage
    hour parking attendant case on behalf of nationwide parking management company.
    Secured dismissal of wage
    hour class claims during the pre-certification process on behalf of agriculture company
    resolved individual wage
    hour claims for nuisance value.
    Represented
    defended various health care companies in wage
    hour misclassification lawsuits involving contractors
    field clinician workers.
    Prevailed on summary judgment motion, which resulted in dismissal of employee mobility
    non-compete lawsuit against trade show marketing company.
    Prevailed on motions for summary adjudication against two former truck drivers on behalf of nationwide retail company dismissing FEHA-based employment claims, including wrongful termination, harassment, discrimination, whistleblower retaliation, failure to provide reasonable accommodations
    engage in the interactive process, violation of the California Family Rights Act,
    unfair competition.
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Woo prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
    Internships: Judicial Extern, Hon. Fred W. Slaughter, Orange County Superior Court, 2014
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/w/woo-noah-m

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2016, California
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law
    Class of 2016
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California at Irvine
    Class of 2012
    B.S.

Email Noah M. Woo

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Noah M. Woo was admitted in 2016 to the State of California.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Noah M. Woo attended University of California, Hastings College of the Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions