×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Stoel Rives LLPAttorney
no photo

Bao M Vu

Not yet reviewed

Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 1120, San Francisco, CA 94111

Litigation and Real Property Law

About Bao M Vu

Bao M Vu is a lawyer practicing litigation, real property law. Bao received a B.A. degree from University of California, Santa Barbara in 2008, and has been licensed for 15 years. Bao practices at Stoel Rives LLP in San Francisco, CA.

Reviews for Bao

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 1
    • Real Property Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Trial
    Arbitration: Trial
    appellate counsel for asphalt plant operator in mineral trespass lawsuit brought by gold dredging company seeking disgorgement damages in excess of $10 million. Cal. Sierra Dev., Inc. v. George Reed, Inc., 145 Cal. App. 5th 663 (2017).
    Arbitration counsel for recycling corporation in multimillion-dollar indemnity dispute concerning largest metals recycling facility in California.
    Arbitration counsel for national qui tam law firm in multimillion-dollar professional negligence lawsuit.
    Environmental & Energy Disputes: Defended multinational agrochemical
    agricultural biotechnology corporation against class action lawsuits involving genetically modified crops.
    Represented electric generation facility in multimillion-dollar dispute involving complex 418 MW Power Purchase
    Sale Agreement with large, investor-owned utility.
    Represented solar energy project developer in numerous disputes throughout U.S. involving Engineering, Procurement,
    Construction agreements, supplier agreements,
    commercial leases.
    Defended industrial facility specializing in materials conversion
    titanium, steel,
    high temperature alloys forging in administrative enforcement proceeding before the South Coast Air Quality Management District, concurrently prosecuting related writ lawsuit before the Superior Court challenging curtailment procedures.
    Proposition 65: Represented industrial facilities against environmental exposure claims under Proposition 65.
    Represented food, nutritional supplement, fashion accessory,
    footwear manufacturers
    retailers against consumer exposure claims under Proposition 65.
    Competitor Disputes: Defended road construction company in lawsuit involving bid rigging, price fixing,
    market allocation antitrust claims.
    Defended medical foods company in lawsuit involving false advertising
    labeling
    related claims.
    Defended metals fabricator in lawsuit involving trade secret misappropriation
    related claims.
    Shareholder Disputes: Defended employee assistance corporation in shareholder inspection
    derivative suits brought by minority shareholders.
    Defended flooring corporation's officer in derivative lawsuit involving breach of fiduciary duty, mismanagement,
    waste claims.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2011, California
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
    Memberships

    Professional Activities

    •Asian Law Alliance
    - Board of Directors

    •Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom
    - Mentor

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Davis School of Law
    Class of 2011
    J.D.
    UC Davis Law Review, Managing Editor; Environmental Policy and Law Journal, Senior Editor
    Other Education
    University of California, Santa Barbara
    Class of 2008
    B.A.
    with honors
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1985
    San Jose, California, October 8, 1985

Bao M Vu

Attorney at Stoel Rives LLP
Not yet reviewed

Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 1120San Francisco, CA 94111U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Craig M. Peters
Pro
Craig M. Peters
4.9
11
Litigation lawyer
628-529-0267
View Profile
Charles R. Fenton
Pro
Charles R. Fenton
5.0
2
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

725-308-3161
View Profile
Solomon Benjamin Cera
Pro
Solomon Benjamin Cera
5.0
1
Litigation lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile
no photo
Pro
Richard E. McGreevy
5.0
1
Litigation lawyer
415-632-3209
View Profile
Justin A. Goodman
Pro
Justin A. Goodman
5.0
3
Litigation lawyer
628-303-0129
View Profile

Email Bao M Vu

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions