×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Sheppard MullinOf Counsel
Arthur J. Friedman

Arthur J. Friedman

Not yet reviewed

Seventeenth Floor, Four Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA 94111

Litigation, Insurance Litigation, Real Estate, Energy, Land Use & Environmental and 3 more

About Arthur J. Friedman

Arthur J. Friedman is a lawyer practicing litigation, insurance litigation, real estate, energy, land use & environmental and 3 other areas of law. Arthur J. received a B.A. degree from Yale University in 1989, and has been licensed for 34 years. Arthur J. practices at Sheppard Mullin in San Francisco, CA.

Arthur J. Friedman (San Francisco, California)

Reviews for Arthur J.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 5
    • Insurance Litigation
    • Real Estate, Energy, Land Use & Environmental
    • Land Use Litigation
    • CEQA Documentation and Defense
    • Environmental

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Published Decisions: California Charter Schools Association v. City of Huntington Park 35 Cal. App. 5th 362 (2019)
    May v. City of Milpitas (2013) 217 Cal. App. 4th 1307
    Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton (2012) 210 Cal. App. 4th 1484
    Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal. App. 4th 296
    Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton (2010) 48 Cal. 4th 481
    County of Sacramento v. Superior Court (2009) 180 Cal. App. 4th 943
    Gilroy Citizens for Responsible Planning vs. City of Gilroy (2006) 140 Cal. App. 4th 911
    Preservation Action Council v. City of San Jose (2006) 141 Cal. App. 4th 1336
    Bodega Bay Concerned Citizens vs. County of Sonoma (2005) 125 Cal. App. 4th 1061
    Anderson First Coalition v. City of Anderson (2005) 130 Cal. App. 4th 1173
    Schnall v. Hertz Corporation (2000) 78 Cal. App. 4th 1144
    Aerojet-General Corporation v. Transport Indemnity Company (1997) 17 Cal. 4th 38

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1992, California
    U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Eastern, and Central Districts of California
    Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Texas
    Class of 1992
    J.D.
    with honors
    Other Education
    Yale University
    Class of 1989
    B.A.
    cum laude

Arthur J. Friedman

Of Counsel at Sheppard Mullin
Not yet reviewed

Seventeenth Floor, Four Embarcadero CenterSan Francisco, CA 94111U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

J. Kevin Morrison
Pro
J. Kevin Morrison
5.0
8
Litigation lawyer
628-529-0005
View Profile
James L. Cunningham, Jr.
Pro
James L. Cunningham, Jr.
4.7
18
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

530-485-6991
View Profile
John D. Simmons
Pro
John D. Simmons
4.9
19
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

CallView Phone
View Profile
Jeremy D. Cloyd
Pro
Jeremy D. Cloyd
4.8
21
Litigation lawyer
628-786-5132
View Profile
Mandy Gina Leigh
Pro
Mandy Gina Leigh
5.0
21
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

415-417-2049
View Profile

Email Arthur J. Friedman

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions