×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Zacks & Freedman, P.C.Founder
Andrew M. Zacks
Pro

Andrew M. Zacks

4.8
5 reviews

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1950, San Francisco, CA 94111

Landlord and Tenant Law, Real Estate, Land Use Regulation and 2 more

About Andrew M. Zacks

Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award for Copyright Law, 1986.

Andrew M. Zacks (San Francisco, California) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Andrew M. Zacks got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Andrew M. Zacks

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.8
See All Reviews
5
3.8
Lawyers.com
2
Martindale
Not yet reviewed
5.0
Avvo
3
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
50%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
50%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
3.5
Responsiveness
3.5
Value for Money
3.0
Real Estate
Posted by anonymous
March 07, 2012
Hired Attorney Andrew M. Zacks

Andrew Zacks and his partner Scott Freedman succeeded in rescinding the purchase of a multi-million dollar house we bought that had several undisclosed defects. In the end, the arbitrator concluded the sellers had committed intentional fraud and awarded us everything we asked for. We won because Andrew and Scott left no stone unturned (sellers hid docs during discovery), hired best experts, maintained high ethics, and asked arbitrator for reasonable award. Z&F - best real estate attys in CA.

 
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Posted by anonymous
October 28, 2010
Hired Attorney Andrew M. Zacks

personally, Andrew is an excellent lawyer. Unfortunately, the only time you get to work with Andrew is in the initial consultation. Subsequently, the work is handed off to an associate a local attorney in the turnover is such that my initial attorney left before the issue was settled. I was expected to pay for the additional time required by the 2nd associate to get up to speed on the case. We finally settled satisfactorily, however the attorneys fees amounted to 60% of the settlement.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate 1
    • Landlord and Tenant Law
  • Other 3
    • Land Use Regulation
    • Land Use Permitting
    • Property Rights

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    video conferencing software
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Founder
    Firm Name
    Zacks & Freedman, P.C.
    Firm Onwership
    Minority Owned
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Drouet v. Superior Court, 31 Cal. 4th 583, 2003
    San Remo Hotel L.P.v. City
    County of San Francisco, 27 Cal. 4th 643, 2002
    Reidy v. City
    County of San Francisco Cal. App. 4th, WL 2384436 2004
    Frye v. Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., 120 Cal. App. 4th 1208, 2004
    Tom v. City
    County of San Francisco, 120 Cal. App. 4th 674, 2004
    Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Astoria Hotel, 83 Cal. App. 4th 139, 2000
    Ching v. San Francisco Board of Permit Appeals (Harsch Investment Corp.) 60 Cal. App. 4th 888, 1998
    San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. San Francisco City
    County, 364 F3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2004)
    San Remo Hotel v. City
    County of San Francisco, 145 F3d 1095 (9th Cir. 1998)
    Birkner v Lam, 156 Cal. App. 4th 275
    Daro v. Superior Court, 151 Cal. App. 4th 1079.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, Ohio
    1990, California
    1990, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
    1993, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships
    San Francisco, Ohio State and American Bar Associations.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Santa Clara University
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California at Santa Cruz
    Class of 1983
    B.A.

Contact Andrew M. Zacks

Founder at Zacks & Freedman, P.C.
4.8
5 reviews

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1950San Francisco, CA 94111U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM

Email Andrew M. Zacks

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Andrew M. Zacks was admitted in 1989 to the State of Ohio.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Andrew M. Zacks is admitted to practice in California and Ohio.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Andrew M. Zacks attended Santa Clara University.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Zacks & Freedman, P.C. was established in 2005.
  • Is the law firm that this attorney is affiliated with minority owned?
    Yes, the firm Andrew M. Zacks is affiliated with is a minority owned business.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.