Sheppard MullinPartner

John Tinley Brooks

About John Tinley Brooks

John Tinley Brooks is a lawyer practicing litigation, appellate, class action defense and 6 other areas of law. John received a B.A. degree from Stanford University, and has been licensed for 33 years. John practices at Sheppard Mullin in San Diego, CA.

Awards

Reviews for John

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Bankruptcy
Posted by anonymous
September 03, 2010
Hired Attorney

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Insurance
  • Business Law
  • Other 6
    • Appellate
    • Class Action Defense
    • Insurance Litigation
    • Healthcare
    • Retail, Fashion & Beauty
    • Self-Storage

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Clients turn to John, inside
    outside California, because of his track record of success in high-exposure cases before trial, at trial,
    on appeal in the areas of insurance, healthcare,
    consumer class actions. Representative matters include: Insurance: Defense verdict, after 4-week jury trial, on $46 million claim for alleged bad faith failure to settle 'permanent vegetative state' brain damage claim. (2018)
    Defense verdict, after 10-day jury trial, on $5.5 million claim for bad faith
    elder abuse in connection with claim for uninsured motorist benefits. (2018)
    Victory, after 9-day arbitration, against $22.5 million claim by excess insurer that accused primary insurer of bad faith failure to settle claim by grievously injured 9-year-old girl. (2014)
    Victory in arbitration against $1 million claim for alleged bad faith failure to settle traumatic brain injury claim. (2021)
    After being brought in by insurer on eve of trial, tried 4-week trial of claim that bad faith h
    ling of UIM claim drove the plaintiff out of business
    led him to attempt suicide. The trial resulted in a verdict less than 25% of plaintiff's lowest pre-trial dem
    . (2015)
    Won reversal on appeal of $4 million judgment against insurer client accused of bad faith failure to settle death claim, with order that judgment be entered for client. McDaniel v. GEICO, 681 Fed.Appx. 614, 2017 WL 892516 (9th Cir. 2017)
    Under Hawaii law, won summary judgment for insurer in suit seeking over $30 million based on accusation that insurer's delay in settling business interruption claim drove insured out of business. (2016)
    Won summary judgment for insurer client, establishing non-coverage of $21 million judgment construction defect judgment based on 'your product' exclusion. (2016)
    Under Missouri law, won affirmance on appeal for insurer client accused of bad faith failure to settle a multi-claimant auto injury claim. Purscell v. Tico Ins. Co., 790 F.3d 842 (8th Cir. 2015).
    Won affirmance on appeal of jury trial victory for insurer client accused of bad faith failure to settle. Du v. Allstate Ins. Co., 697 F.3d 753 (9th Cir. 2012).
    Healthcare: Victory, in arbitration, on $50 million claim against health care service plan client for alleged underpayment of emergency room claims
    alleged violation of reimbursement regulations. (2020)
    Victory, in arbitration, against UCL claim alleging that health care service plan's methodology for calculating 'reasonable
    customary' payments for non-contracted emergency services was illegal
    unfair. (2021)
    Won summary judgment on claim seeking to impose over $4 billion in retroactive gross premium tax liability on a health care service plan client. (2020)
    Victory on summary judgment against claim by City Attorney accusing health care service plan of UCL violations based on allegedly inaccurate provider directories. (2022)
    On motion to dismiss, defeated consumer class action accusing health care service plan of violating Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. (2022)
    On motion to dismiss, defeated consumer class action alleging that health care service plan violated state
    federal law by virtue of limitations on coverage for wheelchairs. (2022)
    After being brought in on eve of trial in an $80 million certified class action alleging underpayments to provider by health care service plan client, won class decertification
    complete dismissal without payment by the client. (2015)
    After being brought in two years into class action litigation, won complete dismissal through an anti-SLAPP motion of suit contending that a medical group client illegally charged excessive witness fees when its physicians were subpoenaed to testify. (2015)
    Consumer Class Action: In California Supreme Court, defeated class action accusing self-storage client of illegal
    unlicensed sale of insurance. Heckart v. A-1 Self Storage, Inc., 4 Cal. 5th 749 (2018).
    In California Supreme Court, defeated class action attacking clients' contractual med pay reimbursement rights. 21st Century Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 47 Cal.4th 511 (2009).
    Defeated class action seeking over $200 million from client for allegedly charging illegal premium installment fees. Interinsurance Exchange of the Auto. Club v. Superior Court (Williams), 148 Cal.App.4th 1218 (2007).
    Defeated two class actions alleging false price advertising
    misleading sales practices by motor club client. Davis-Miller v. Automobile Club of So. Cal., 201 Cal.App.4th 106 (2011).
    After being brought in two years into class action litigation, won complete dismissal through an anti-SLAPP motion of suit contending that a medical group client illegally charged excessive witness fees when its physicians were subpoenaed to testify. (2015)
    Won dismissal on the pleadings, affirmed on appeal, in class action alleging that motor club client's compensation system illegally incentivized sales agents to upsell. Rogers v. Automobile Club of So. Cal., 2016 WL 1253528 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
    Defeated class action accusing insurer client of providing less coverage than represented in stated value auto policies. George v. Automobile Club of So. Cal., 201 Cal.App.4th 1112 (2011).
    Defeated class action accusing insurer client of violating statute prohibiting 'steering' insureds to preferred body shops. Maystruk v. Infinity Ins. Co., 175 Cal.App.4th 881 (2009).
    Under Arizona law, defeated class action alleging that auto insurer client failed to adequately secure customer consent to waive UM/UIM coverage. (2014)
    Other Victories Resulting in Appellate Opinions: Won summary judgment of price fixing
    other antitrust claims against Realtor association client concerning pricing for multiple listing service. Freeman v. San Diego Association of Realtors, 77 Cal.App.4th 171 (1999).
    Won affirmance on appeal for restaurant client in trademark infringement dispute. Department of Parks & Recreation v. Bazaar Del Mundo, Inc., 448 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006).
    Under Nevada law, won affirmance on appeal of judgment for insurer client accused of bad faith h
    ling of UIM claim. Sherwin v. Infinity Ins. Co., 639 Fed.Appx. 466 (9th Cir. 2016).
    Won affirmance on appeal of judgment for insurer client accused of bad faith failure to settle. Grayson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 650 Fed.Appx. 320 (9th Cir. 2016).
    Won summary judgment for insurer client accused of breach of duty to defend in fatality case. Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Shower, 648 Fed.Appx. 617 (9th Cir. 2016).
    Under Louisiana law, won reversal on appeal with directions to enter judgment for insurer client in a coverage dispute involving the effect of the 'separations of insureds' clause. Petrozziello v. Thermadyne Holdings Corp., et al., 211 So.3d 1199. WL 658242 (La. App. 2017).
    Won summary judgment, affirmed on appeal under doctrine of judicial estoppel, for insurer client accused of bad faith denial of theft claim. Hamilton v. State Farm Ins. Co., 270 F.3d 778 (9th Cir. 2001)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1993, California
    Hawaii
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •California Academy of Appellate Lawyers
    •Board of Governors 2004-2007, Editor-in-Chief of ABTL Report 2000-2004, Association of Business Trial Lawyers
    •San Diego County Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Stanford University
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    in Philosophy

    Stanford University
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    with honors and distinction

    Stanford University
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    with distinction

    Stanford Law School
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Stanford University
    B.A.
    1988 Phi Beta Kappa

    Stanford University
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
    in Philosophy

    Stanford University
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
    with honors and distinction

    Stanford University
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
    with distinction
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1966
    San Diego, California, August 29, 1966

John Tinley Brooks

Partner at Sheppard Mullin
5.0
1 review

501 West Broadway, Nineteenth Floor (Downtown)San Diego, CA 92101U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Kenneth H. Stone
Pro
Kenneth H. Stone
5.0
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Richard S. Van Dyke
Pro
Richard S. Van Dyke
4.7
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Walter A. Taylor
Pro
Walter A. Taylor
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Anita Joy Margolis
Pro
Anita Joy Margolis
5.0
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Alreen Haeggquist
Pro
Alreen Haeggquist
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: