×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C.Managing Partner
Erwin Jay Shustak

Erwin Jay Shustak

Not yet reviewed

477 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10022-6837 + 4 locations

Litigation and Arbitration, Business Law, Securities and 12 more

About Erwin Jay Shustak

Erwin Jay Shustak is a lawyer practicing litigation and arbitration, business law, securities and 12 other areas of law. Erwin received a B.A. degree from Rutgers College, and has been licensed for 50 years. Erwin practices at Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. in New York, NY and 4 others locations.

Erwin Jay Shustak (New York, New York)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Erwin Jay Shustak got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Erwin

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Securities 1
    • Securities Fraud
  • Real Estate
  • Investments 1
    • Financial Services Law
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Competition
  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 7
    • Litigation and Arbitration
    • Complex Securities
    • Business Arbitration
    • Financial Fraud
    • Real Estate Disputes
    • Business Disputes
    • SEC, FINRA and Regulatory Investigations and Enforcement Proceedings

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Managing Partner
    Firm Name
    Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Todd Vitale
    John Paladino v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC,, FINRA Case No. 11-01633
    Chiavarelli v. Williams, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13249
    Merritt v. United States of America, et al, 960 F.2d at 15 (2nd Circuit 1992)
    University Mews Associates v. Jean Marie, et al, 471 N.Y.S.2d 457, 122 Misc.2d 434 (New York County 1997)
    Estate of Aronoff, 653 N.Y.S.2d 844, 171 Misc.2d 172 (New York County 1997)
    Podsiadlo v. Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, Inc., et al (Arbitration) (American Stock Exchange 1998)
    Financial Northeastern Securities, Inc. v. Steel, et al. (Arbitration) (National Association of Securities Dealers 1997)
    Fisher v. Shearson Lehman Hutton (Arbitration) (American Stock Exchange 1992)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1976, New Jersey
    1976, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
    1977, New York
    1979, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    1980, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York and U.S. Court of Appeals, Second and Fifth Circuits
    1984, U.S. Supreme Court
    1985, California
    1990, U.S. District Court, Central District of California
    1998, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
    U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court Northern District of New York
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court Central District of California
    U.S. District Court Northern District of California
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court Northern District of New York
    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York
    U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of California
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court Western District of New York
    U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York
    U.S. District Court Western District of New York
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court New Jersey
    1977, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Memberships
    The Association of the Bar of the City of New York
    San Diego County (Arbitrator, Fee Arbitration Committee, 2000-)
    New York State Bar Association
    State Bar of California
    The Association of Trial Lawyers of America
    San Diego Business Trial Lawyers Association
    Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association
    FINRA (formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers), National Futures Association and National Arbitration Forum (Arbitrator)
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    New York University School of Law
    J.D.
    cum laude

    New York University School of Law
    J.D.
    NYU Law Review
    Other Education
    Rutgers College
    B.A.
    Economics

    Rutgers College
    B.A.
    cum laude

    Rutgers College
    Omicron Delta Epsilon

    National Economics Honor Society, 1973

Erwin Jay Shustak

Managing Partner at Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

477 Madison Avenue, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022-6837U.S.A.

Show on map

477 Madison Avenue, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022-6837U.S.A.

Show on map

1801 Century Park East, Suite 2400Los Angeles, CA 90067U.S.A.

Show on map

1 Sansome Street, Suite 3500San Francisco, CA 94104U.S.A.

Show on map

19200 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 600Irvine, CA 92612U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Marc H. Pillinger
Pro
Marc H. Pillinger
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

914-829-3584
View Profile
Clifford Allen Meirowitz
Pro
Clifford Allen Meirowitz
4.1
18
General Practice lawyer
347-913-0071
View Profile
Myles Alderman, Jr.
Pro
Myles Alderman, Jr.
5.0
5
General Practice lawyer
959-777-3742
View Profile
Robert Hawkins, Esq.
Pro
Robert Hawkins, Esq.
5.0
6
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

212-257-3884
View Profile
Mayer Morganroth
Pro
Mayer Morganroth
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

947-224-4100
View Profile

Email Erwin Jay Shustak

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions