×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Office | Sacramento, CA

Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP Pro

4.8
7 reviews

765 University Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95825-6748, U.S.A.

Criminal Law, White Collar Crime, Federal Practice and 8 more

MEET OUR TEAM

M. Bradley Wishek - Lawyer in Sacramento, CA
Pro
Pro
Member M. Bradley
Wishek
Meet all 8 Lawyers

About Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP

Creative, experienced and respected criminal and professional licensing Defense in Sacramento, Yolo, Placer, El Dorado, Nevada, San Joaquin, and other Northern California Counties. Listed in Best lawyers and Super Lawyers.

Rothschild Wishek & Sands LLP is listed in Martindale-Hubbell's Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers. Three lawyers in the firm are listed in the peer reviewed publication "Best Lawyers in America" and five have been recognized as "Northern California Super Lawyers" or "Rising Stars" by Sacramento and San Francisco magazines.

Firm attorneys have the experience and expertise to defend criminal allegations of all types from business related such as environmental or health care fraud to individual concerns such as sexual misconduct, internet related matters, crimes of violence and alcohol and drug related allegations. The firm offers creative alternatives and aggressive representation in state and federal trial and appellate courts.

Firm attorneys represent individuals and business entities in professional licensing, disciplinary investigations and proceedings before all California agencies and boards, including in writ review proceedings in the superior and appellate courts.

 

View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP

Have you consulted or hired this firm?

Leave a review about your experience with this firm.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.8
See All Reviews
7
3.8
Lawyers.com
3
4.9
Martindale
2
1.0
Avvo
2
Showing 1-3 of 3 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
67%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
33%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
4.0
Quality of Service
3.7
Responsiveness
3.7
Value for Money
3.7
Administrative Law
Posted by Dr. Henderson
November 20, 2024
Hired Attorney Shannon V. Baker

I had the distinct pleasure of working with Shannon Baker in my case against the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. From the start, Shannon’s professionalism, compassion, and attention to detail exceeded all expectations. Her communication was consistent, ensuring I was informed and supported throughout the process. Shannon’s expertise in administrative law was evident in her thorough preparation and strategic defense. She left no detail overlooked, countered opposing arguments with precision, and presented my case with unmatched poise. Her ability to navigate the complexities of my situation gave me confidence every step of the way. Her fees were entirely reasonable given her exceptional expertise and dedication to my case. If you’re facing credentialing or administrative legal challenges, I wholeheartedly recommend Shannon Baker. Her professionalism, expertise, and genuine care make her an outstanding advocate and an invaluable ally.

 
Criminal Law
Posted by anonymous
February 26, 2020
Hired Attorney Clyde M. Blackmon

Blackmon represented my husband in a case where he came on real strong, acted like he was a great lawyer who would destroy the opposition then caved and acted like a kid out of college yet he would scream at me when I demanded he expose evidence the prosecution was hiding and lying witnesses. Blackmon was paid a lot of money and caved against the prosecution, never investigated facts and failed to filed documents to protect the appeal. He made comments about short people, boasted about his assistance who left in the middle of the case, and did an awful job. He clearly showed he never believed in his client and it was all about the money.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law 4
    • Drug Crimes
    • DUI/DWI
    • Juvenile Criminal Law
    • Parole And Probation
  • White Collar Crime
  • Administrative Law 1
    • Professional Licensing
  • Litigation 1
    • Firearms Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Other 1
    • Federal Practice

Office Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features

    Fixed hourly rates

    Accepted Credit Cards

    Visa
    MasterCard

  • Firm History
    Year Established

    1991

  • Representative Clients

    Representative Client: California Teachers Association.

  • Additional Links

    http://www.rwslaw.com

Contact Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP

4.8
7 reviews

765 University AvenueSacramento, CA 95825-6748U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 916-640-0027
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Email Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.