About Michael D. Lane

Michael D. Lane has deep commercial litigation experience as an associate and lead counsel in many complex litigation cases, including class actions, business disputes, trade secrets and employee mobility, labor and employment, computer fraud and abuse, noncompete, unfair competition, and Business and Professions Code Section 17200 actions.

He has also represented clients in labor and employment issues. He has represented clients in federal and state courts, as well as in administrative hearings, arbitrations (single and panel), writ proceedings, and trials.

Concentrations

•Commercial Litigation
•Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition/Employee Mobility
•Class Action
•Contract Disputes/Business Torts
•Labor and Employment
•Franchise Law
•Products Liability
•Intellectual Property Litigation

 

Reviews for Michael D. Lane

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trade Secrets
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 1
    • Intellectual Property Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Intellectual Property Litigation/Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition: 3M Company
    3M Innovative Properties Company: v. ACS Industries, Inc. (U.S. District Court of Minnesota): Represented 3M in action for misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition
    tortious interference against a competitor.
    Dexcom, Inc.
    Charles Boykin v.
    Medtronic, Inc.: (USDC Southern District) Represent Medtronic in parallel litigation in California, where former employee sought declaratory relief that non-compete
    non-solicit provisions in employment agreement were not enforceable in California, despite ongoing enforcement proceeding in Minnesota.

    ECI Software Solutions: v Sheridan, et al.: Represented ECI in a complaint against former employees
    independent contractors for trade secret misappropriation under DTSA, 18 U.S.C. 1836,
    related claims.

    Ermetic Ltd.:, v. David Bise: Breach of restrictive covenant by former employee David Bise.

    EverDriven: vs FirstAlt, et al. (US Dist Ct, ND CA): DTSA, UTSA
    related claims in federal court against competitor for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets, among other things.

    Everdriven Technologies, LLC: v First Student, Inc: Represented Everdriven in a complaint against competitor company for trade secret misappropriation
    related claims.

    EverDriven: Mead (AAA matter): DTSA, UTSA
    related claims in arbitration against former employee for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets for the benefit of a competitor, among other things.
    WeRide Corp. et al v. Wang, Huang,
    Zhong Zhi Xing Technology Co. Ltd, Allride, AI Inc,: ND Cal. Defended corporate defendants in case alleging misappropriation of trade secrets relating to autonomous car technology. Published decisions include: WeRide Corp. v. Huang, et al., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22915 (Feb. 12, 2019)
    WeRide Corp. v. Huang, et al., 379 F. Supp. 3d 834, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55996 (March 22, 2019)
    WeRide Corp. v. Huang, et al., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130781
    2019 WL 3555343 (August 5, 2019)
    WeRide Corp. v. Huang, et al., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160378 (Sept 18, 2019)
    WeRide Corp. v. Huang, et al., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174869 (Oct. 7, 2019)
    WeRide Corp. v. Huang, et al., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192212, 2019 WL 5722620 (Nov. 5, 2019)
    Nicole Wilson
    Rosetta Stone LTD v. Open English LLC: Represented Open English in a multi-jurisdiction trade secret case (Florida
    California) including a California declaratory relief claim under a non-compete agreement.
    Stephanie Allen
    Rosetta Stone LTD v. Open English LLC: Represented Open English in a multi-jurisdiction trade secret case (Florida
    California) including a California declaratory relief claim under a non-compete agreement.
    NFP Retirement, Inc. v Kyle Posvistak et al: Represented plaintiff company in seeking injunctive relief against departing employees taking confidential customer information.
    Labor
    Employment: Caroline S
    ers v.
    eCommerce Industries, Inc.: Wrongful termination case, alleging pregnancy discrimination.
    Clark v.
    HDR: Defended client in a case alleging racial discrimination.
    Franchise Law: La-Z-Boy Incorporated v.
    Masashi-Noriko, Inc.: Represented client in litigation involving franchise, contractual,
    quasi-contractual disputes.
    Salvesen v. La-Z-Boy Incorporated
    .: Represented client in litigation involving franchise, contractual,
    quasi-contractual disputes.
    Contract Disputes/Business Torts: EPI Solution Technology Co., et al.v. Veeco Instruments, Inc.: Represented client in litigation involving international contractual
    quasi-contractual disputes.
    eCommerce Industries, Inc. v. MWA Intelligence, Inc.: Represented software spin-off,
    Tech AnyWare, LLC:, in Delaware Chancery action, alleging various tort claims arising from spin-off.
    Toolco Industrial Corp. v. Bowen & Groves, Inc., et al.: Defended client in litigation involving contractual
    quasi-contractual disputes.

    eCommerce Industries, Inc.: v. MWA Intelligence, Inc.: Represented client in multi-district litigation involving contractual
    quasi-contractual disputes.
    Products Liability: Estepp v. 3M Electronic Monitoring, Inc., et al.: Defended client in litigation involving product liability claims.
    Published
    Unpublished Decisions: DiVincent v. DiVincent: 2013 WL 6234619 (N.D Cal, December 2, 2013)

    eCommerce Industries, Inc.: v. MWA Intelligence, Inc.: 2013 WL 5621678 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, October 4, 2013)
    Patent Litigation representations prior to joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP: Invalidated all asserted claims in reexamination proceedings while representing a consumer electronics developer, Microsoft,
    Yahoo! in patent litigation relating to digital media.
    Represented consumer electronics developer in patent litigation.
    Represented consumer electronics developer
    a newly hired employee in trade secret litigation.
    Obtained summary judgment of invalidity of seven of nine independent claims for consumer electronics developer in patent litigation.
    Function Media v. Yahoo!. Defended Yahoo! against suit accusing Yahoo!'s internet advertising methods of infringing two patents.
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
    2005, California
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, American Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California at Berkeley School of Law
    Class of 2005
    J.D.
    Prosser Prize, Patent Law, 2004
    Other Education
    University of California at Santa Barbara
    Class of 1993
    B.A.
    History
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1971
    Palo Alto, California, October 27, 1971
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Michael D. Lane was admitted in 2005 to the State of California.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Michael D. Lane is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, United States District Court for the Northern District of California and United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.