×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLPDeceased
Clyde M. Blackmon
Pro

Clyde M. Blackmon

4.6
1 review

765 University Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95825-6748

About Clyde M. Blackmon

Clyde M. Blackmon joined Rothschild Wishek & Sands as a partner in 2012, and retired from the practice of law in January 2021. Before commencing private practice in 1969, he was a Ford Foundation intern with the California Legislature and served as a consultant to various legislative committees, including the Assembly Committee on Criminal Procedure. Mr. Blackmon handled virtually every kind of criminal matter during his 51-year career as a criminal defense lawyer. He was admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court as well as all federal and state courts in California.

Mr. Blackmon was a member of the American College of Trial Lawyers. He was listed in the peer-reviewed publication “Best Lawyers in America”, where he was named Sacramento Lawyer of the Year for Criminal Defense: General Practice in 2011 and 2014, and Sacramento Lawyer of the Year for Criminal Defense: White-Collar in 2012. Mr. Blackmon was recognized by the peer-reviewed publication “Northern California Super Lawyers.” He received an AV, preeminent lawyer, rating by Martindale-Hubbell.

Mr. Blackmon was a member of California Attorneys for Criminal Justice and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. He served on the Board of Directors of the Central California Appellate Program and was Chair of the Board of Directors of Harm Reduction Services, which seeks to reduce the harm caused by narcotics abuse through outreach programs and needle exchange.

He was motivated to practice criminal law by his belief in the importance of individual liberty and dedication to the rights of those accused of crime.

 

Clyde M. Blackmon (Sacramento, California) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Clyde M. Blackmon got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Clyde M. Blackmon

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.6
See All Reviews
1
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
2.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Criminal Law
Posted by anonymous
February 26, 2020
Hired Attorney Clyde M. Blackmon

Blackmon represented my husband in a case where he came on real strong, acted like he was a great lawyer who would destroy the opposition then caved and acted like a kid out of college yet he would scream at me when I demanded he expose evidence the prosecution was hiding and lying witnesses. Blackmon was paid a lot of money and caved against the prosecution, never investigated facts and failed to filed documents to protect the appeal. He made comments about short people, boasted about his assistance who left in the middle of the case, and did an awful job. He clearly showed he never believed in his client and it was all about the money.

 

Services

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Deceased
    Firm Name
    Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    People v. Duran, 16 Cal.3d 282, 545 P.2d 1322 (1976)
    Fortes v. Municipal Court, 113 Cal.App.3d 704, 170 Cal.Rptr. 292 (1980)
    People v. Koch, 209 Cal.App.3d 770, 257 Cal.Rptr. 483 (1989)
    Lewis v. Superior Court, 217 Cal.App.3d 379, 265 Cal.Rptr. 855 (1990)
    In re Madrid, 19 Cal.App.3d 996, 97 Cal.Rptr. 354 (1971)
    Martinez v. Superior Court, 29 Cal.3d 574, 629 P.2d 502 (1981)
    Nadler v. Superior Court, 255 Cal.App.2d 523, 63 Cal.Rptr. 352 (1967)
    In re Angelia P., 28 Cal.3d 908, 623 P.2d 198 (1981)
    Putman v. Superior Court, 140 Cal.App.4th 567, 44 Cal.Rptr.3d 575 (2006)
    People v. Sherwin, 82 Cal.App.4th 1404, 98 Cal.Rptr.2d 888 (2000)
    People v. Wilkinson, 163 Cal.App.4th 1554, 78 Cal.Rptr.3d 501 (2008)
    People v. Yates, 34 Cal.3d 644, 669 P.2d 1 (1983).
  • Additional Links
    https://www.rwslaw.com/attorneys/attorneys-2/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1965, California
    1969, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
    1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    1984, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
    1988, U.S. Supreme Court
    1997, U.S. District Court, Central District of California
    Memberships
    State Bar of California
    California Attorneys for Criminal Justice
    National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
    Bar Fellowship
    American College of Trial Lawyers.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley
    Class of 1964
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    University of Berkeley
    Class of 1961
    B.A.
    with honors
  • Military Service
    U.S. Marine Corps., 1953-1957
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born 1935 (Deceased)

Contact Clyde M. Blackmon

Deceased at Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP
4.6
1 review

765 University AvenueSacramento, CA 95825-6748U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Email Clyde M. Blackmon

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Clyde M. Blackmon has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Clyde M. Blackmon will accept Visa and MasterCard.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP has 8 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Clyde M. Blackmon attended Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Clyde M. Blackmon is listed in the Administrative Law, Appellate Practice, Criminal Trial Practice and White Collar Crime section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions