Patricia M. McDonagh

Practice Details

• Firm Information
  Position

  Shareholder

  Firm Name

  Marshall Dennehey
• Representative Cases & Transactions
  Cases

  Significant Representative Matters: Obtained summary judgment in favor of an automobile liability insurance carrier, wherein court upheld carrier's disclaimer of defense
  indemnity coverage to its insured in response to personal injury lawsuit brought against insured arising from motor vehicle accident on the basis that insured had made material misrepresentations on his insurance policy application as to where he resided
  principally garaged the insured vehicle.
  Successfully represented an insurance carrier in a declaratory judgment action, wherein carrier disclaimed coverage to insured under an automobile liability insurance policy with regard to an underlying personal injury lawsuit brought against insured arising from a motor vehicle accident because insured failed to provide the carrier with notice of either the accident or the resultant lawsuit
  which, in turn, substantially prejudiced the insurer.
  Obtained summary judgment on behalf of defendant employers
  having all claims against them dismissed in civil lawsuits brought against them by their own employees for injuries the employees sustained in the workplace on the basis that there was no evidence to support a finding that the intentional wrong exception to the workers' compensation bar applied. In one of these cases, in particular, after successfully in having the plaintiff employee's claim against his employer dismissed, the employee continued to litigate his claim against the remaining defendant, a forklift manufacturer, resulting in a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff in excess of $1 million, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal.
  Obtained summary judgment in favor of a commercial general liability carrier in a declaratory judgment action, successfully limiting the CGL carrier's potential liability exposure in a case involving serious injuries to two plaintiffs as a result of a robbery. Received a favorable ruling from the court that the $100,000 aggregate policy limit, set forth in the CGL policy's Assault & Battery Endorsement, was the applicable liability coverage limit potentially available to the injured plaintiffs under the CGL policy
  not the $1 million per occurrence coverage limit, set forth in the policy's Declarations, as was argued by the plaintiffs.
  Successfully defended a CGL insurance carrier in a claim brought against it by the l
  lord/owner of a warehouse for defense
  indemnity coverage as an Additional Insured under a CGL insurance policy issued by the carrier to one of the tenants at the warehouse in a high-exposure property damage loss case arising from a fire on the basis that the l
  lord did not qualify as an additional insured on the policy pursuant to the Additional Insured Endorsement
  the l
  lord's claim should be a claim against its insurance broker for professional negligence in not procuring the proper insurance coverage requested by the l
  lord.
  Obtained summary judgment in favor of a subcontractor on an indemnity cross-claim, where the contract at issue, between the subcontractor
  the general contractor, did not include the required express language that the general contractor would be indemnified for own negligence.
  Published Works: New Jersey Supreme Court Holds that Evidence of an Insured's Uncompensated Medical Expenses Falling Between the Insured's Selected PIP Coverage
  the Statutory Maximum PIP Coverage of $250,000 Is Inadmissible, Legal Updates for Coverage
  Bad Faith, March 28, 2019
  New Jersey Environmental Insurance Law: The Battle Over Coverage Between Insurers
  Policyholders, Arising from Owned Property Exclusion Clauses in CGL Policies, Defense Digest, Fall 2004
  Are E-Mails Privileged?, For The Defense, November 2000