×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Freeman & Freeman, P.C.Member
Mark A. Freeman, Esq.
Pro

Mark A. Freeman, Esq.

Not yet reviewed

100 Park Avenue, Suite 250, Rockville, MD 20850

Commercial Law, Business Law, Public Utility Law and 6 more

About Mark A. Freeman, Esq.

Law Achievement Scholar, 1992. Author: BR "Attorney Client Privileged in the United States: Attorney Client Privilege State Law," Trial Vol. 32 No. 9, September 1996. Seminar Leader, "Investigating and Defending Utility Contact Accidents," Clapp Research Associates P.C., May 2001. Lecturer, "Know Your Legal Right and Obligations," National Association of Catering Executives, 2002. Member, Editing Staff, "The Art of Litigation Advocacy: Mock Patent Jury Trial," Adams Industries v. Nippon Camera Corp., based on Honeywell, Inc., v. Minolta Camera Co., U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, American Intellectual Property Law Association 1995 mid-winter meeting. Presenter, "Preparing the Case for Trial from the Outset," Maryland Trial Lawyers Association, Baltimore, Maryland, January 28, 1994.

 

Mark A. Freeman, Esq. (Rockville, Maryland) View website

Reviews for Mark A.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Law
  • Business Law
  • Contracts
  • Leases and Leasing
  • Torts
  • Other 4
    • Public Utility Law
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Licensing

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Freeman & Freeman, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Wright v. United States, 53 Fed. Ct. 466 (2002)
    Wright v. United States, 51 Fed. Ct. 639 (2002)
    Pippin v. PEPCO et. al., 132 F.Supp. 2d. 379 (2001)
    Pippin v. PEPCO et. al., 78 F.Supp. 2d. 487 (1999)
    Word v. PEPCO, 742 A.2d 452 (1999).
  • Additional Links
    http://freemanattorneys.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1992, Maryland
    1993, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
    1994, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    1995, District of Columbia
    1998, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
    2001, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark office
    2004, Colorado
    Virginia
    Memberships
    Montgomery County, Maryland State and American (Member, Intellectual Property Section) Bar Associations
    State Bar of California (Member, Intellectual Property Section)
    District of Columbia Bar
    Maryland Patent Lawyers Association
    Federal Circuit Bar Association
    Marlboro Inn of Court (Barrister, 2002)
    J. Dudley Diggs Inn of Court (Pupil, 1994).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Baltimore
    Class of 1992
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Indiana University
    Class of 1987
    B.A.
    Business
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1965
    Alexandria, Virginia, April 15, 1965

Contact Mark A. Freeman, Esq.

Member at Freeman & Freeman, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

100 Park Avenue, Suite 250Rockville, MD 20850U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 301-315-0210
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Tuesday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Wednesday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Thursday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Friday 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM

Email Mark A. Freeman, Esq.

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Mark A. Freeman, Esq. was admitted in 1992 to the State of Maryland.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Mark A. Freeman, Esq. is admitted to practice in Colorado, District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Mark A. Freeman, Esq. offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Mark A. Freeman, Esq. attended University of Baltimore.
  • Does this attorney maintain any other responsibilities in the firm outside of legal work?
    Mark A. Freeman, Esq. is the Managing Partner of the firm.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions