×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Daniel J. Ballou
Pro

Daniel J. Ballou

4.3
2 reviews

113 E. Main St., Suite 201, Rock Hill, SC 29730

Commercial Litigation, Governmental Relations and Economic Development, Real Estate Disputes and 43 more

About Daniel J. Ballou

Dan, a veteran civil litigator, has experience at all levels of federal and state courts in South Carolina. He represents clients in hearings and trials in the court system as well as before local councils, agencies and commissions.He has worked with clients on a variety of land use and zoning matters, as well as assisted businesses seeking economic development incentives from state and local government. Dan helps companies interested in building or expanding in the Central Upstate including Rock Hill, Fort Mill and York, Chester and Lancaster Counties obtain the approvals they need to move their projects forward. Many of Dan’s clients are involved in the construction and real estate development industries.Dan is active in the community as well. His volunteer work in York County reaches across a broad spectrum of organizations, from the United Way of York County to involvement at his children’s schools. He also is a member of the Liberty Fellowship Class of 2012.

 

Daniel J. Ballou (Rock Hill, South Carolina) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Daniel J. Ballou got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Daniel J.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.3
See All Reviews
2
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
50%
1 star
50%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
1.5
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
2.5
Value for Money
1.0
Business Litigation
Posted by DENLEY
May 09, 2025
Hired Attorney

I-77 divided our farm in 1975, and half of it was without access to a highway. SCDOT provided access through a neighbor's property. A developer contacted me in Oct., 2023 about relocating our access to allow for a 7 Eleven plaza. We gave tentative approval to the relocation in Nov., 2023. In June, 2024, a deputy appeared at my door serving me a Petition to close the state road that was my access. In July, 2024, Mr. Dan Ballou was recommended to me and I employed his services. After four months of "consultations" ( at $450 an hour) I was presented with a Non- Exclusive Access Easement Agreement that contained so many "special conditions" that my access was under the COMPLETE control of the landowner. I was giving up a state maintained road for a controlled easement. I became very active in this simple case and pressed Dan for a different settlement. He became cooperative, and with the help of the original developer a settlement, very similar to the Nov., 2023 plan, was signed

 
Civil Litigation
Posted by Charles
January 09, 2025
Hired Attorney

Mr. Ballou falls into the class of typical attorneys,at Best. Our impression was that his only interest was in billable hours rather than aggressively pursuing our case, which is what we hired him for.

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Law 2
    • Construction Litigation
    • Construction Defects
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Contracts 1
    • Breach of Contract
  • Corporate Law 1
    • Corporate Litigation
  • Insurance 1
    • Commercial Insurance
  • Litigation 2
    • Civil Litigation
    • Complex Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Competition
  • Other 34
    • Governmental Relations and Economic Development
    • Real Estate Disputes
    • Administrative and Regulatory Law
    • Administrative Litigation
    • Professional Licensing
    • Professional Licensing Regulation
    • Business Torts
    • Entrepreneurial Business Law
    • Emerging Growth Companies
    • Commercial Torts
    • Complex Commercial Litigation
    • Construction Claims
    • Construction Liability
    • Contract Fraud
    • Contract Litigation
    • Nonprofit Corporations
    • Condemnation
    • Inverse Condemnation
    • Property Rights
    • Local Government Law
    • Local Government Relations
    • Public Policy
    • State Government Law
    • Government Tort Liability
    • Covenants Not To Compete
    • Executive Severance Contracts
    • Professional Discipline
    • Real Estate Brokers Licensing
    • Real Estate Brokers and Agents Liability
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Trade Secret Misappropriation
    • Zoning
    • Planning and Land Use
    • Land Use Litigation

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Morton & Gettys
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Disclaimer: The following examples are intended only to be representative of Mr. Ballou's practice. These examples are not intended to,
    cannot be relied upon to predict the results in any other case.

    Estate of Winifred P. Painter v. Strahan, 2011 WL 380152, (Feb. 2, 2011)
    Sloan Financial Group, LLC v. Coe, 2010 WL 4668341, 32 IER Cases 99 (2010)
    Nash v. Tara Plantation Howmeowners Ass'n, Inc., 2010 WL 10080093, (July 12, 2010).
    Orr v. Elastomeric Products, 323 S.C. 342, 474 S.E.2d 448 (1996)
    Settlemeyer v. McCluney, 359 S.C. 317, 596 S.E.2d 514 (2004)
    South Carolina Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Love Chevrolet, Inc., 324 S.C. 149, 478 S.E.2d 57 (1996)
    Bowles v. Bradley, 319 S.C. 377 (1995)

  • Additional Links
    http://mortongettys.com/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1994, South Carolina
    U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    1991, Texas
    Memberships
    York County Bar (President, 2000-2001)
    South Carolina Bar (House of Delegates, 2007 - present)(Judicial Qualifications Committee, 2009-present)(Nominating Committee, 2013 - present). State Bar of Texas.
  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Princeton University
    Class of 1987
    Bachelor of Art

    Princeton University
    Class of 1987
    History

    University of South Carolina School of Law
    Class of 1991
    Juris Doctor

Contact Daniel J. Ballou

Partner at Morton & Gettys
4.3
2 reviews

113 E. Main St., Suite 201Rock Hill, SC 29730U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Activity

Email Daniel J. Ballou

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Daniel J. Ballou is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and United States District Court for the District of South Carolina.
  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Daniel J. Ballou has a professional profile on LinkedIn.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Daniel J. Ballou has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Morton & Gettys has 20 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Morton & Gettys was established in 2001.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions