×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Arthur D Spratlin, Jr.

Arthur D Spratlin, Jr.

Not yet reviewed

1020 Highland Colony Parkway, Suite 1400, P.O. Box 6010, Ridgeland, MS 39157

Trucking Litigation, Tort, Transportation & Specialized Litigation, Machinery & Recreational Product Litigation and 7 more

About Arthur D Spratlin, Jr.

Arthur D Spratlin, Jr. is a lawyer practicing trucking litigation, tort, transportation & specialized litigation, machinery & recreational product litigation and 7 other areas of law. Arthur received a degree from University of Mississippi in 1988, and has been licensed for 35 years. Arthur practices at Butler Snow LLP in Ridgeland, MS.

Arthur D Spratlin, Jr. (Ridgeland, Mississippi)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Arthur D Spratlin, Jr. got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Arthur

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 2
    • Trucking Litigation
    • Machinery & Recreational Product Litigation
  • Products Liability 1
    • Warranty
  • Premises Liability
  • Communications and Media 1
    • Entertainment and Media
  • General Practice
  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction & Development
  • Other 3
    • Tort, Transportation & Specialized Litigation
    • Transportation and Trucking Rapid Response
    • Products, Catastrophic & Industrial Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Butler Snow LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Coordinator of Butler Snow's Autonomous Vehicle Technology Group
    Coordinator of Butler Snow's Trucking Group.
    Coordinator of Butler Snow's 24-Hour Accident Investigation Team.
    Served as National/Regional counsel for motor coach manufacturer from 1995-2002
    appeared in approximately 20 states.
    Zaniewski v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc., et al., USDC, Western District of Tennessee, Western Division (Trial - September 2019)
    Westbrook v. Jackson Public Transportation Co., Inc., Hinds County Circuit Court (Defense Verdict), 2012.
    English v. Rebelwood Apartments, Hinds County Circuit Court (Deadlocked Jury), 2012.
    Smith v. The Waggoners Trucking Corporation, Washington County Circuit Court (Greenville, MS) (Defense Verdict), 2012.
    Fenelon v. Jackson Metrocenter Mall, Ltd., 2012 Miss. App. LEXIS 735 (Summary Judgment for Defense).
    Suzette Smith v. The Waggoners Trucking Corporation
    Antonio Watson, 69 So.3d 773 (Miss. App. 2011).
    Patrick v Wal-Mart, Inc. - Store No. 155, 2011 WL 1085788 (N.D. Miss, March 21, 2011).
    Bendall v. GM, Genesee County Circuit Court, (Flint, Michigan), 2007.
    Spratlin Investments, LP, et al., v. Paul Tyler, Calhoun County Chancery Court (Tried in Lafayette County), 2004.
    Jack Blackwell v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc., Smith County Circuit Court, 2003 (Defense Verdict).
    King v. American RV Centers, Inc., 862 So. 2d 558 (Miss. App. 2003).
    McAlex
    er v. SMC Corporation
    R
    y's RV's of Wilmington, Inc., USDC, Eastern District of North Carolina, Southern Division (Wilmington), 2002.
    Simmons v. SMC Corp.
    Beaver Motor Coaches, Inc., USDC, Southern District, MS, 1998.
    Delta Pride Catfish, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co., 697 So. 2d 400 (Miss. 1997).
    Beasley v. The Hardaway Company, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division, 1996.
    Slay
    USF&G v. Mr. Coffee, USDC, Eastern District, Meridian, 1996(Defense Verdict).
    Moody v. Mr. Coffee, County Court, Hattiesburg, MS, 1995 (Defense Verdict).
    Swanson v. Ellard Homes, Circuit Court, Madison County, 1995.
    Tony Burnett v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., USDC, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division, 1993.
    Barnes v. Consolidated Freightways, County Court, Hinds County, 1993.
    Utility Constructors, Inc. v. City of Vicksburg, Circuit Court, Warren County, Vicksburg, 1992.
    Michael Construction Co. v. FDOT, Circuit Court, Leon County, Tallahassee, FL, 1991.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1991, Mississippi
    U.S. District Courts, Mississippi: Northern and Southern Districts
    U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, 6th Circuit
    Admitted pro hac vice in numerous states
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Associations

    The Harmonie Group

    Board of Directors, 2012-2019

    Transportation Committee, 2009-2019

    Chair, 2009-2012

    Product Liability Committee

    Vice-Chair, 2015-2019

    Butler Snow Liason, 2007-2019

    Trucking Industry Defense Association (TIDA)

    Transportation Lawyer Association (TLA)

    International Association of Lemon Law Administrators (IALLA)

    American Bar Association

    Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section

    Commercial Transportation and Litigation General Committee (CTLGC)

    Technology Vice Chair, 2019-2020

    Vice-Chair, 2017-2018

    CTLGC Newsletter

    Associate Editor, 2014-2016

    Defense Research Institute (DRI)

    Transportation Law Committee/Trucking Subcommittee

    Young Lawyers Committee

    State and Local Defense Organizations Subcommittee

    Chair

    Substantive Liaisons Subcommittee

    Chair

    Trucking Law Committee

    Liaison

    Construction Committee

    Marketing/Publicity Subcommittee

    Regional Chairperson

    Mississippi Bar Association

    Mississippi Defense Lawyers Association

    Young Lawyers Division

    Chairman, 1996

    Capital Area Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1991
    J.D.
    Mississippi Law Journal

    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1991
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1991
    J.D.
    1991 Business Manager
    Other Education
    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1988
    B.Accy.

    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1988
    cum laude

    Downing College
    Class of 1989
    Cambridge Summer Session
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1966
    1966

Email Arthur D Spratlin, Jr.

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions