×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Charles Lamont Whitham

Not yet reviewed

11491 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 340, Reston, VA 20190

Intellectual Property, Emerging Growth Companies and Technology Law

About Charles Lamont Whitham

Charles Lamont Whitham is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, emerging growth companies, technology law. Charles received a B.E.E. degree from George Washington University in 1961, and has been licensed for 58 years. Charles practices at Whitham ＆ Cook, P.C. in Reston, VA.

Charles Lamont Whitham (Reston, Virginia)

Reviews for Charles

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 2
    • Emerging Growth Companies
    • Technology Law

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Whitham ＆ Cook, P.C.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1968, District of Columbia
    1971, U.S. Supreme Court
    1973, Maryland
    1978, Virginia
    1978, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
    1978, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    1982, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
    Memberships
    American Intellectual Property Law Association
    Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Maryland School of Law
    Class of 1967
    J.D.
    Other Education
    George Washington University
    Class of 1961
    B.E.E.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1938
    Del Norte, Colorado, June 17, 1938

Charles Lamont Whitham

Of Counsel at Whitham ＆ Cook, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

11491 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 340Reston, VA 20190U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Kevin T. Oliveira
Pro
Kevin T. Oliveira
2.9
1
Intellectual Property lawyer
571-609-6992
View Profile
F. Douglas Ross
Pro
F. Douglas Ross
5.0
2
Intellectual Property lawyer
571-631-7133
View Profile
Dexter S. Odin
Pro
Dexter S. Odin
5.0
1
Intellectual Property lawyer
571-631-7142
View Profile
Lee E. Berlik
Pro
Lee E. Berlik
4.6
56
Intellectual Property lawyer
771-240-1167
View Profile
Craig J. Franco
Pro
Craig J. Franco
4.9
14
Intellectual Property lawyer
571-631-7027
View Profile

Email Charles Lamont Whitham

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions