Goldberg Segalla LLPPartner

Mr. Thomas More Buckley

About Mr. Thomas More Buckley

Mr. Thomas More Buckley is a lawyer practicing civil litigation and trial, commercial litigation and arbitration, employment and labor and 4 other areas of law. Thomas received a B.A. degree from Boston College in 1987, and has been licensed for 36 years. Thomas practices at Goldberg Segalla LLP in Raleigh, NC.

Awards

Reviews for Thomas

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Other 6
    • Civil Litigation and Trial
    • Commercial Litigation and Arbitration
    • Employment and Labor
    • Construction Litigation and Counsel
    • Construction
    • Business

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Goldberg Segalla LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Goins v. Time Warner Cable, North Carolina Court of Appeals (2018): The court granted a new trial on the grounds that sudden emergency instruction was improperly given.
    Lancaster v. Harold K. Jordan
    Company, Inc., 776 SE2d 345 (2015): The court upheld summary judgment by the North Carolina Business Court on the grounds of collateral estoppel, holding that the Lancasters were bound by prior arbitration findings because they controlled the litigation, maintained a financial stake in its outcome,
    had notice of it.
    Cantillana v. Five Oaks Homeowners Association (2012): The court upheld a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a complaint by a homeowner that sought injunctive relief preventing the association from imposing fines for failure to comply with architectural guidelines. The court found that the trial court was correct in dismissing the action, given that the association's guidelines provided the requisite authority to impose fines to enforce those guidelines.
    Harris v. Barefoot, 704 SE2d 282 (2010): The court upheld summary judgment in a dog bite case on the grounds that the plaintiffs had failed to project evidence that the dog had a vicious propensity,
    further that the defendant had reason to know of a vicious propensity. The court noted that the plaintiff's attempt to establish a vicious propensity of the breed based on a Wikipedia article was not persuasive.
    Haynes v. B&B Realty Group, 663 SE2d 691 (2006): The court upheld summary judgment of claims of a profit sharing agreement breach
    unfair trade practice. The court held that because the profit sharing had not vested at the time of the relationship's termination, there was no breach of contract,
    further that the plaintiff's past services for the company could not constitute legal consideration for any transfer of ownership.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1999, North Carolina
    1990, California
    U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Middle Districts of North Carolina
    Memberships

    Professional Affiliations

    • International Association of Defense Counsel
    • Vice-chair for Membership, Construction and Law and Litigation Committee, 2020-present
    • New Member Ambassador, 2019-present
    • Chair, Construction Law and Litigation Committee, 2018-20
    • Vice-chair for Publications, Professional Liability Committee, 2017-18
    • Committee Member, Construction law and Litigation, Employment, Professional Liability, 2015-present
    • American Association of Safety Professionals
    • North Carolina Public Risk Management Association (NC PRIMA)
    • North Carolina Bar Association
    • Wake County Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California Hastings College of Law
    Class of 1990
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Boston College
    Class of 1987
    B.A.
    Political Science and Film Production
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: