×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Marshall DenneheyShare Holder
Jennifer Michelle Meyers
Pro

Jennifer Michelle Meyers

Not yet reviewed

287 Bowman Avenue, Suite 404, Purchase, NY 10577 + 1 location

General Liability, Premises and Retail Liability, Automobile Liability and 4 more

About Jennifer Michelle Meyers

Jennifer is a Shareholder in the firm's Casualty Department, where she handles all areas of general liability litigation. She has significant experience in a wide range of matters, including personal injury, premises liability, retail liability, and automobile liability. Jennifer has litigated a broad spectrum of cases, including slip and falls, property damage, motor vehicle accidents, dog bites, construction defects, mold exposure, and labor law. As a litigator, Jennifer passionately advocates for her clients in every case she handles and has brought her cases to successful resolution through trial, mediation and motion practice.

Throughout her career, Jennifer has emphasized the importance of working closely with her clients to develop successful case strategies and effective litigation plans tailored to the unique issues presented by each case she works on. Jennifer also prides herself on her ability to develop good working relationships with her adversaries which ultimately benefit her clients and lead to greater success in the cases she handles.

Before joining the firm in 2015, Jennifer's practice was concentrated in professional liability insurance coverage with a focus on errors and omissions coverage for securities broker/dealers and registered representatives. In this role, Jennifer also assisted in the drafting of insurance policies.

Jennifer graduated from American University in Washington, DC in 2006, with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Public Communications and a minor in Business Administration. She received her juris doctor in 2010, graduating cum laude from Pace Law School. During her time in law school, Jennifer served as president of the American Constitution Society, participated in Moot Court and volunteered with the Unemployment Action Center.

Honors & awards

The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
2022

Hudson Valley Magazine, Top Lawyer
2022

Year joined

2015

Thought Leadership

Federal Court Denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment After Further Analysis of “Corporate Liability”

Westchester
Trucking & Transportation Liability
October 1, 2023
This matter involved a collision between a train and a tractor-trailer. The plaintiff moved for summary judgement with respect to the defendants’ negligence, and the motion was denied. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

Federal Court Dismisses Portions of Plaintiff’s Claims Against Insurer for Failing to Pay UIM Benefits

Westchester
Trucking & Transportation Liability
Insurance Services - Coverage & Bad Faith Litigation
October 1, 2023
The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident and claims to have sustained serious personal injuries. The plaintiff had $600,000 in underinsured/uninsured motorist coverage with his insurer. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

Federal District Court Finds that Mental Health Records Are Not Discoverable Under Ohio State Law

Westchester
Trucking & Transportation Liability
October 1, 2023
While the plaintiff claimed that, following his motor vehicle accident with the defendants’ semi-trailer truck, he suffered from “head pain, neck pain, headaches, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to sound, trouble concentrating, memory loss...and m Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

Insurance Provider Granted Summary Judgment Based on an “Aircraft Liability Exclusion” Within Its Policy

Westchester
Trucking & Transportation Liability
October 1, 2023
This matter involved a petition by Travelers, seeking a declaration that it did not owe a duty to indemnify or defend its insured in a personal injury lawsuit pursuant to its “Aircraft Liability Exclusion.” Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

Southern District Court Limits Admissibility of Statements Made to Plaintiff’s Physicians at the Time of Trial

Westchester
Trucking & Transportation Liability
October 1, 2023
This decision relates to several motions in limine and the Southern District Court’s determination as to what evidence was not admissible at trial. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

Classes/Seminars Taught

Pre-suit Litigation: How to Effectively Investigate Your Claim, Marshall Dennehey Client Presentation, January 25th, 2023

Best Billing Practices, CLE Client Seminar, May 2, 2014

 

Jennifer Michelle Meyers (Purchase, New York) View website

Reviews for Jennifer

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 7
    • General Liability
    • Premises and Retail Liability
    • Automobile Liability
    • Trucking & Transportation Liability
    • Construction Injury Litigation
    • Property Litigation
    • New York Construction and Labor Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Marshall Dennehey
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Representative Matters: Obtained summary judgment dismissing third-party plaintiff's claims for contribution
    indemnification on behalf of a snow removal contractor, in a case where parties failed to demonstrate any breach of duty owed by the snow removal contractor.
    Won two appeals before the Appellate Division, Second Department. We represented an out-of-possession l
    lord in a personal injury action which became the subject to two appeals before the Appellate Division, Second Department. The plaintiff worked in retail
    was allegedly injured due to a claimed defect to the front door. After we moved for summary judgment, the plaintiff opposed our motion
    made an entirely new allegation of liability against our client. She also sought leave to amend her bill of particulars to assert this new claim. The plaintiff's motion to amend was granted,
    our motion for summary judgment was denied with leave to renew after additional discovery relating to the plaintiff's new claim. We appealed this decision. The Appellate Court unanimously reversed the decision granting the plaintiff's motion to amend
    reversed its order denying summary judgment, finding that our insured was an out-of-possession l
    lord. With respect to the second appeal, after the plaintiff was given leave to amend her bill of particulars, we conducted further discovery
    moved for summary judgment a second time,
    we won this motion. The court agreed with our position that our client was an out-of-possession l
    lord,
    the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate notice. The plaintiff appealed this decision. The Appellate Court unanimously dismissed her appeal.
    Obtained summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's case on the grounds that plaintiff did not put forth sufficient evidence establishing her claim that she sustained a 'Serious Injury' pursuant to New York State Insurance Law 5102(d).
    Obtained a defense verdict in a property damage trial, where the plaintiff was claiming ongoing flooding
    damage to her condominium.
    Obtained summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's case in a personal injury action where the plaintiff was a passenger on a school bus involved in an accident. Jennifer demonstrated that plaintiff did not put forth sufficient evidence establishing her claim that she sustained a 'Serious Injury' pursuant to New York State Insurance Law 5102(d).
    Obtained summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's case in a slip
    fall action, where the plaintiff failed to establish creation or notice,
    therefore, could not prove any negligence on the part of the condominium.
    Obtained summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims against an out of possession l
    lord following a workplace injury.
    Obtained summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint in a personal injury action wherein the plaintiff claimed she fell on a defective sidewalk in Yonkers, New York.
    Published Works: 'When is it Too Late to Change Your Theory of the Case?' New York Law Journal, Litigation Special Report, March 13, 2023
  • Additional Links
    http://www.marshalldennehey.com/attorneys/jennifer-m-meyers

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2011, New York
    2016, U.S. District Court Southern District of New York
    2016, U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York
    Memberships

    Associations & Memberships

    •Westchester Womens Bar Association, January 2015

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
    Class of 2010
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    American University
    Class of 2006
    B.A.

Contact Jennifer Michelle Meyers

Share Holder at Marshall Dennehey
Not yet reviewed

287 Bowman Avenue, Suite 404Purchase, NY 10577U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (914) 977-7301

287 Bowman Avenue, Suite 404Purchase, NY 10577U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (914) 977-7301
view 1 other office Location
hide 1 other office Location

Other Office Location

Purchase, NY

287 Bowman Avenue, Suite 404Purchase, NY 10577U.S.A.

Show on map

Email Jennifer Michelle Meyers

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Jennifer Michelle Meyers was admitted in 2011 to the State of New York.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Jennifer Michelle Meyers is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Jennifer Michelle Meyers attended The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Marshall Dennehey was established in 1962.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions