×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Dennis Steinman
Pro

Dennis Steinman

4.4
17 reviews

520 SW Yamhill Street, Suite 600, Portland, OR 97204-1329

Americans with Disabilities Act, Civil Rights Law, Business Law and 11 more

About Dennis Steinman

Phi Delta Phi. Recipient: Best Oralist and Honors Brief, First Year Moot Court Competition; Best Trial Memorandum and Notebook, Mock Trial Competition; ASCAP Nathan Burke Award, National Copyright Competition. Author: "Disability Law in the Twenty-First Century," Lawyers and the ADA, 2001 Oregon State Bar Convention; "Reasonable Accommodation Under the ADA," Fair Housing Act and Oregon Law, Lorman Education Services, 2001; "Reasonable Accommodation Under the ADA," Fair Housing Act and State Law, Oregon Law Institute Continuing Legal Education, 2000; "The Undiscovered ADA," Oregon Law Institute Continuing Legal Education, 1999; "ADA Update: Reasonable Accommodation Beyond Physical Access," Associational Discrimination, Conflict of Laws, and Damages, 1999 Oregon State Bar Convention; "Sharpening Your Skills: The ADA's Application to Oregon's Regulatory and Licensing Programs," Oregon Law Institute Continuing Legal Education, 1999. Since 2001, Adjunct Professor, Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College. Formerly with Steinman Cooper Wiscarson LLC.

 

Dennis Steinman (Portland, Oregon) View website

Awards

Silver Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 3 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.0 or higher.
Champion Badge Silver
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Dennis Steinman got this award in 2021

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Dennis Steinman got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Dennis

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.4
See All Reviews
17
4.2
Lawyers.com
4
4.4
Martindale
12
5.0
Avvo
1
Showing 1-4 of 4 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
75%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
25%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
4.3
Quality of Service
4.3
Responsiveness
4.3
Value for Money
4.0
Civil Rights
Posted by Jason
April 17, 2025
Hired Attorney

I cannot recommend Dennis Steinman and Scott Aldworth at Kell, Alterman & Runstein highly enough. As someone who had never sued anyone before at age 51, I was incredibly anxious about the entire process of my FHA case. Dennis and Scott made what could have been an overwhelming experience much more manageable. What stood out to me most was how they took the time to thoroughly explain complex legal concepts and procedures that I didn't understand. They never made me feel rushed or foolish for asking questions - and I had many! Their patience and clear communication helped me feel informed and confident throughout the entire process. Dennis and Scott were always available whenever I needed them. Whether I had a quick question or needed a more in-depth explanation, they responded promptly and thoughtfully. This level of accessibility was incredibly reassuring during such a stressful time. The team's expertise really shined during mediation. They skillfully guided process to a resolution.

 
Civil Rights
Posted by Martesha
February 01, 2022
Hired Attorney

I don’t think I would have been able to make it through this process without the help and encouragement of Dennis and Scott. I did not have to worry about a nothing and was updated every step of the way.

Americans with Disabilities Act
Posted by Linda
January 27, 2022
Hired Attorney

Dennis was kind and explained everything very well. He made sure I understood everything that was happening in my case.

Employee Benefits
Posted by anonymous
August 28, 2015
Hired Attorney

Dennis totally overbilled me for his services. I lost more money by having him as an attorney than I stood to win in the first place. He never warned me that he was going to charge so much. He did not give an explanation for the excess fees except for "Reviewing the case". I plan to contact the Better Business Bureau to file a claim against him and his firm.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Corporate Law
  • Commercial Law
  • Litigation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 7
    • Civil Rights Law
    • Franchise Law
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Employment Law
    • General Litigation
    • Health Law
    • Real Estate Law

Practice Details

  • Languages
    American Sign Language
    Italian
    French
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Kell, Alterman & Runstein, L.L.P.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Finch, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14438, September 6, 2001
    Glass v. Hillsboro Sch. Dist. 1J, 142 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (D. Or. 2001)
    Alford v. City of Cannon Beach, 2000 WL 33200554 (D. Or. 2001)
    Sherwood v. Finch, 2000 WL 1862562 (D. Or. 2000)
    Glass v. Hillsboro School Dist. 1J, 2000 WL 1877647 (D.Or. 2000)
    Cornilles v. Regal Cinemas, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15465, September 15, 2000, Decided, September 18, 2000
    Cornilles v. Regal Cinemas, Inc., 2000 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 15464, August 2, 2000, Decided, August 2, 2000, Filed, Adopting Order of September 15, 2000
    LaFore v. Housing Authority of Portl
    , 1999 WL 1058992 (D.Or. 1999)
    Drew v. Merrill, CV 99-810 KI, Consent Decree (D. Or. 1999)
    Green v. Housing Authority of Clackamas County, 994 F.Supp. 1253 (D. Or. 1998).
  • Additional Links
    http://www.kelrun.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Supreme Court of the United States
    1995, Oregon
    1996, U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Memberships
    Federal Bar Association
    Multnomah Bar Association
    Oregon State Bar (Member: Civil Rights Section Executive Committee, 2001—
    Disability Law Section Executive Committee, 2001—).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College
    Class of 1995
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Temple University
    Class of 1976
    B.A.
    cum laude

Contact Dennis Steinman

Partner at Kell, Alterman & Runstein, L.L.P.
4.4
17 reviews

The Pacific Building, 520 SW Yamhill Street, Suite 600Portland, OR 97204-1329U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 503.227.2980
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:30 PM

Email Dennis Steinman

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Dennis Steinman is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States District Court for the District of Oregon and United States Supreme Court.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Dennis Steinman speaks Italian, French and American Sign Language.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Dennis Steinman offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Dennis Steinman attended Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Kell, Alterman & Runstein, L.L.P. was established in 1929.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.