About Ryan A. Hauck

An experienced litigator, Ryan has spent more than a decade defending employers, insurance companies and third-party administrators in worker’s compensation matters throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and before the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board. This experience has afforded him the opportunity to develop professional relationships not only with his clients, but also with judges and opposing attorneys.

Ryan has defended all types of workers’ compensation claims with low to high exposure arising from orthopedic injuries, traumatic brain injuries, amputations/loss of use, hearing loss, scarring and occupational diseases, and death claims. He has secured positive results for a wide array of clients, from Fortune 500 companies to locally owned family businesses, including regional and national insurance companies and third-party administrators, banks, commercial retailers, manufactures, restaurants, staffing agencies, trucking companies, school districts, churches, nursing homes, medical facilities and construction companies.

From the moment a claim is assigned, Ryan’s goal is to achieve a fast and favorable resolution, whether through settlement or litigation. His approach is simple: listen to his clients and communicate with them, early and often, to understand their objectives and formulate and implement an aggressive pragmatic strategy. In addition to his trial work, Ryan counsels clients on all aspects of workers’ compensation claims management, including pre-litigation issues and compensability determinations. He works closely with clients to develop a creative risk management strategy focused on reducing workers’ compensation exposure in the most cost effective manner possible. Ryan is also experienced in the resolution of Medicare compliance issues that arise in the settlement of workers’ compensation claims.

Within the firm, Ryan serves as a member of the Executive Committee Advisory Council, a distinguished group of firm leaders whose purpose is to enhance the communication between the Executive Committee and younger members of the firm's professional ranks, including associates, special counsel and junior shareholders.

An active member of the local legal community, Ryan belongs to the Allegheny County Bar Association and the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Coalition. He was elected by his peers (in 2019, 2023 and 2025) to serve a two-year term on the Council of the Allegheny County Bar Association’s Workers’ Compensation Section. This committee analyzes all phases, questions and problems in the field of workers' compensation, and attempts to resolve problems that are identified within the practice of workers' compensation through the interaction with the Bureau of Workers' Compensation and its administrative personnel. Additionally, the committee is responsible to keep its members, the bar association, and the public informed of the various developments, amendments, and modifications in the statutory law and regulations relating to workers' compensation.

Ryan graduated cum laude from Duquesne University School of Law. He received numerous accolades during his time there, including the Honorable Carol Los Mansmann Excellence in Writing Award, the CALI Excellence for the Future Award in Legal Research and Writing, and the Outstanding Appellate Brief and Oral Argument Awards. While completing his undergraduate degree at Westminster College, Ryan served as a member of a national fraternity and was a two-year basketball letterman.

When Ryan is not advocating on behalf of his clients, he enjoys tailgating and attending Pittsburgh Steeler games, golfing, riding bikes and fishing. Most of all, he enjoys spending as much time as possible with his wife, Ashley, and two children Gavin and Shay.

Honors & Awards

•The Best Lawyers in America, Workers’ Compensation Law - Employers (2025-2026)
•The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, Workers' Compensation Law - Employers (2022)

Classes/Seminars Taught

Specific Loss / Disfigurement, Pennsylvania Bar Association's Workers' Compensation Fall Section Meeting, Hershey, PA, October 13, 2023
Strategies to Limit Exposure and Minimize Risk, Marshall Dennehey Workers' Compensation Seminar, October 27, 2022

Published Works

•''Raymour' Decision Benefits Insurers And, Arguably, Claimants,' The Legal Intelligencer, Workers' Compensation Supplement, page 4. October 12, 2021
•“Notice of An Injury Can Be Extended Beyond 120 Days,” Defense Digest, March 2021, Vol. 27, No. 2

Results

Defense Victory Obtained in Workers’ Compensation Case

We secured a complete defense victory, saving our client over $500,000 in known exposure and likely millions in long-term liability. The workers’ compensation judge granted our termination petition and denied the claimant’s claim petition, finding that the claimant fully recovered and was not entitled to wage loss or medical benefits. Through medical discovery, we uncovered pre-injury treatment that directly contradicted the claimant’s testimony. The judge favored our medical expert, citing no changes on pre- and post-injury MRIs as further evidence undermining the claim.

Thought Leadership

Raymour' Decision Benefits Insurers and, Arguably, Claimants

October 7, 2021

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court recently issued a workers’ compensation decision favorable to employers and insurance companies which should reduce litigation on issues related to penalty and reinstatement petitions.

Defense Digest

Notice of An Injury Can Be Extended Beyond 120 Days

March 1, 2021

Key Points:Section 311 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act specifies the time that injured workers have for providing notice of a work injury to employers.Unless the employer has knowledge of the occurrence of the injury, the injured worker has to provide notice of a work injury within 21 days to be eligible to receive compensation from the date of injury and onward.If an injured worker does not provide notice within 21 days, no compensation is due until the day notice is provided.An injured worker will be barred from receiving benefits if notice of the injury is not provided within 120 days from the date of injury.In a case of first impression, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania “extended” the statutory time period for giving notice of an injury. An injured worker, in certain circumstances, now has up to 123 days to report a work injury!In Holy Redeemer Hosp. Systems v. WCAB (Figueroa), 2020 WL 7778193 (Pa. Cmwlth. Dec. 31, 2020), the claimant was employed as an emergency room nurse when, on Saturday, July 25, 2015, she felt significant pain in her left leg. The claimant was scheduled to work on Sunday, July 26, 2015, but she called off and sought medical treatment from her physician, who removed her from work. The claimant did not report her work injury to the employer until Monday, November 23, 2015. The case was denied and disputed by the employer and its workers’ compensation carrier, which prompted the claimant to file a claim petition. The Workers’ Compensation Judge found that the claimant sustained a work injury, but that she didn’t provide timely notice under Section 311 of the Act. Specifically, the judge found that the claimant notified the employer of the work injury 121 days after the injury, or one day late.The claimant appealed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which reversed the judge’s finding of timeliness of the claimant’s notice to the employer. The Board noted that the 120th day fell on a Sunday and that Section 311 of the Act was silent as to whether notice needs to be given on a Sunday if the claimant’s notice obligations are set to expire. Accordingly, the Board looked beyond the Act to Section 1908 of the Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa.C.S. 1908, which states:When any period of time is referred to in any statute, such period in all cases, . . . shall be so computed to exclude the first and include the last day of such period. Whenever the last day of any such period shall fall on a Saturday or Sunday, or any day made a legal holiday by the laws of this Commonwealth or of the United States, such day shall be omitted from the computation.The Board found that the claimant timely reported her work injury because she had until Monday, November 23, 2015, to report it. Although that date was 121 days after the work injury, the report was still timely because the 120th day fell on a Sunday, which is omitted from the computation per Section 1908. Ultimately, the case reached the Commonwealth Court when the employer appealed the decision of the Board. The sole issue raised was whether the Board erred in finding that the claimant provided timely notice of the work injury.The employer tried to establish that nothing prevented the claimant from reporting her work injury on Sunday, November 22, 2015, and that the Statutory Construction Act of 1972 did not have an application to Section 311 of the Workers’ Compensation Act. In sum, the employer argued that she didn’t work for an employer who was open for business five days a week. Instead, she worked in the emergency room, which was open 24 hours a day, 365 days per year. Furthermore, she was injured on a Saturday and even called off of work the next day.The Commonwealth Court acknowledged that neither the Act nor the regulations promulgated by the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation provide guidance on how to calculate the 120-day notice requirement. The Commonwealth Court analyzed the above arguments and determined that the claimant timely reported her injury. In doing so, the Commonwealth Court found that Section 1908 applies to a statute that “contains a time period within its terms,” unless the statute specifically excludes the application of Section 1908. The Commonwealth Court explained that, when calculating the 120-day time period, the date of injury is excluded from the calculation, and so is the last day, provided it lands on a weekend or a holiday recognized by the Commonwealth or the United States.These days, the claimant has up to 123 days to report an injury if the 120th day falls on a Saturday and a legally recognized holiday is on a Monday. Make sure you review your calendars closely the next time you think you have a notice defense and can issue a notice of workers’ compensation denial based upon the same. Also, after the claim is reported, make sure you gather as much information as possible during your investigation since this decision doesn’t change the fact that late reporting, even if timely under the Act, is often the first of many red flags related to the claim.*Ryan is a shareholder in our Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania office. He can be reached at 412.803.1173 or rahauck@mdwcg.com.Defense Digest, Vol. 27, No. 2, March 2021 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. 2021 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

News

98 Marshall Dennehey Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

August 20, 2025

Events

Conference

25th Annual Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Conference

May 28-29, 2026

Hershey, PA

Kacey C. Wiedt, Shannon Fellin, Perry D. Merlo, and Ryan A. Hauck

 

Reviews for Ryan A.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 1
    • Workers' Compensation Defense

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Marshall Dennehey
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Representative Matters: Successfully defended a six-figure workers' compensation claim in which the claimant alleged back
    leg injuries
    sought over $60,000 in past wage loss plus ongoing benefits. By collaborating closely with the employer, we preserved
    presented key surveillance footage, coupled with compelling medical evidence
    strategic cross-examination, to challenge the claimant's factual
    medical assertions. The result was a complete denial of the Claim Petition.
    Successfully defended a claim petition that alleged multiple orthopedic fractures
    dislocations to the upper extremity, hip,
    bilateral lower extremities. The claimant was seeking payment of past
    future wage loss
    medical benefits. The workers' compensation judge fully adopted our position that the claimant's injuries did not arise in the course
    scope of employment. Through strategic reliance on case law, focused cross-examination
    close collaboration with the employer to define property boundaries within a commercial complex, we established that the claimant was injured off the premises during an unpaid lunch break, was not furthering the employer's interests,
    was not engaged in any activity authorized, directed or otherwise related to her employment at the time of her injury. This resulted in a complete denial of the claim
    significant savings in litigation spend because the issue was bifurcated before having to participate in costly medical discovery
    evidence.
    Published Works: ''Raymour' Decision Benefits Insurers And, Arguably, Claimants,' The Legal Intelligencer, Workers' Compensation Supplement, page 4. October 12, 2021
    'Notice of An Injury Can Be Extended Beyond 120 Days,' Defense Digest, March 2021, Vol. 27, No. 2
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2011, Pennsylvania
    Memberships

    Associations & memberships

    Allegheny County Bar Association
    Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Coalition

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University
    Class of 2011
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Westminster College
    Class of 2007
    B.A.

Contact Ryan A. Hauck

Share Holder at Marshall Dennehey
Not yet reviewed

Union Trust Building, 501 Grant Street, Suite 700Pittsburgh, PA 15219U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (412) 803-1188

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Ryan A. Hauck was admitted in 2011 to the State of Pennsylvania.
  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Ryan A. Hauck has a professional profile on LinkedIn.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Ryan A. Hauck attended Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University.