×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Patrick Louis Mechas

Patrick Louis Mechas

Not yet reviewed

48 26th Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 + 1 location

Health Care and Long-Term Care, Products Liability, Medical malpractice and 7 more

About Patrick Louis Mechas

Patrick Louis Mechas is a lawyer practicing health care and long-term care, products liability, medical malpractice and 7 other areas of law. Patrick received a B.S. degree from Carnegie Mellon University in 1981, and has been licensed for 35 years. Patrick practices at Burns White LLC in Pittsburgh, PA and 1 other location.

Patrick Louis Mechas (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Patrick Louis Mechas got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Patrick

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Products Liability 1
    • Products liability
  • Medical Malpractice 1
    • Medical malpractice
  • Health Care 1
    • Long-term care
  • Other 6
    • Health Care and Long-Term Care
    • General liability
    • General Liability Litigation
    • Ethics & Professional Responsibility
    • Employment & Labor
    • State, Local And Municipal Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Burns White LLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters
    Secured a defense verdict in an action initiated against the designer
    manufacturer of a dental prosthetic device which plaintiff claimed failed as a result of a defective design. Successfully defended the first Pennsylvania action brought by a nationally-renowned plaintiffs' firm against a skilled nursing facility alleging subst
    ard care. Secured a favorable settlement on behalf of a world-wide manufacturer of electrical transmission products in two separate actions. Fire erupted in a commercial building in which one worker was killed
    the other was severely injured. The plaintiffs claimed the fire was caused by a defective component part produced by the manufacturer
    filed suit alleging negligence, products liability
    breach of warranty
    sought wrongful death
    survival action damages with extensive economic loss claims. Burns White argued that the product performed as it was intended to be used
    that the fire was caused by human error. Secured a defense verdict in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia in a products liability suit on behalf of an international designer
    manufacturer of coating equipment. While cleaning a machine, the plaintiff's h
    was trapped in a roller resulting in a partial amputation. Burns White successfully argued that the plaintiff assumed the risk by not following proper safety procedures while cleaning the machine. Successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of a long-term care facility in an action brought in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The court ruling resulted in a dismissal of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. The action was dismissed by the federal court with leave to re-file in state court relative to a remaining conversion claim.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1991, Pennsylvania
    United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
    United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
    United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
    1994, West Virginia
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •American Bar Association
    •Pennsylvania Bar Association
    •West Virginia Bar Association
    •Allegheny County Bar Association
    •Academy of Trial Lawyers of Allegheny County
    •Defense Research Institute
    •Pennsylvania Defense Institute

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Duquesne University School of Law
    Class of 1990
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Carnegie Mellon University
    Class of 1981
    B.S.
    Administration and Management Science

Email Patrick Louis Mechas

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions