About Henry M. M. Sneath

Business Litigation. Pittsburgh Strong.® DTSALaw® Complex Case Mediation and ADR. AV Rated

Co-Chair of Houston Harbaugh’s Litigation Practice, and Chair of its Intellectual Property Practice, Henry Sneath is a Pittsburgh based corporate and commercial trial attorney, mediator, arbitrator and Federal Court Approved Mediation Neutral and Special Master with extensive federal and state court trial experience in cases involving commercial and business to business disputes, breach of contract litigation, intellectual property matters, patent, trademark and copyright infringement, trade secret misappropriation, DTSA claims, cyber security and data breach prevention, mitigation and litigation, probate trusts and estates litigation, construction claims, eminent domain, professional negligence lawsuits, pharmaceutical, products liability and catastrophic injury litigation, insurance coverage, and insurance bad faith claims. He is currently serving as both lead trial counsel and local co-trial counsel in complex business and breach of contract litigation, patent infringement, trademark infringement and Lanham Act claims, products liability and catastrophic injury matters, and in matters related to cybersecurity, probate trusts and estates, employment, trade secrets, federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and restrictive covenant claims. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Business Litigation and Intellectual Property Lawyer. DTSALaw® PSMNLaw® PSMN®

Henry has been recognized and listed in Best Lawyers in America in 6 categories: Business Litigation, Intellectual Property Litigation, Patent Litigation, Personal Injury – Defense, and Legal Malpractice Plaintiff and Defense Litigation. He has been voted by his peers as a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer in Business Litigation and Intellectual Property. He was a fellow of the prestigious Academy of Trial Lawyers of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania for many years and has spoken at, chaired, facilitated and authored numerous seminars, CLE presentation, law firm retreats and public speaking events on a national basis. He is an accomplished national and regional public speaker and author and was awarded the Defense Lawyer of the Year Award by the Pennsylvania Defense Institute (PDI). He served as President of the 22,000 member international lawyer organization DRI (Defense Research Institute) in 2011-2012 and is a member of the IADC and ADTA organizations. He was Chair of the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Intellectual Property Section and has held numerous other leadership roles in various organizations and on Boards of Directors.

He is currently representing clients in trademark and copyright matters and in patent infringement litigation matters pursuant to the Pittsburgh Federal Local Patent Rules promulgated by the Judges of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and in other jurisdictions. These rules are designed to make the Pennsylvania Western District a forum of choice for patent infringement and invalidation actions. He has worked as co-counsel with some of the world’s largest law firms on high exposure and bet-the-company cases, and is also prepared to assist out-of-state law firms and their clients as local counsel given the intricacies of these Local Patent Rules which provide a procedural mechanism for accelerated case disposition, and numerous changes to the processes of Federal Rule 26 disclosure, claim construction, use of experts and infringement and invalidation contention disclosure.

He has tried over 95 cases to jury and non-jury verdict in Federal and State Court jurisdictions and has helped clients resolve disputes through a variety of Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures. He is serving now as a Federal Court Special Master and mediator in large patent infringement litigation and has received certification in complex case and public policy mediation and facilitation from the Harvard Law School Program on Negotiation (PON) taught by some of the country’s leading academicians on ADR at Harvard, MIT and Tufts University. He is also certified by the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (USDC WDPA) for their approved ADR panel of neutrals to handle mediations, Arbitrations, Early Neutral Evaluations (ENE) and Special Master appointments in business litigation, intellectual property including patent matters, insurance, employment, trade secrets and catastrophic injury cases. Henry also serves as an Adjunct Professor of Law at Duquesne University School of Law teaching 2 courses: Trade Secret Law and the Law of Trademarks and Unfair Competition. He has devoted Pro Bono time to the representation of battered women in Protection from Abuse hearings and trials and is active in his Church and community. He can be found on Twitter @HenryMSneath and on LinkedIn. He also hosts, edits and writes an Intellectual Property and Technology Blog and Podcasts for Houston Harbaugh at www.pitiptechblog.com. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Business Litigation and Intellectual Property Lawyer.

Business Litigation. Pittsburgh Strong.® DTSALaw® and PSMNLaw® are federally registered trademarks of Houston Harbaugh, P.C.

 

Awards

Reviews for Henry M. M. Sneath

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Litigation
Posted by Regis
June 11, 2021
Hired Attorney Henry M. M. Sneath

Over the years, I have referred many complex legal matters to Attorney Sneath. He has consistently obtained successful results. Clients have always been pleased with the attention and professionalism he has demonstrated in the preparation and trial of their civil actions. Mr. Sneath is recognized as an accomplished and experienced litigator by his peers. I highly recommend his litigation services.

 

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation 1
    • Complex Litigation
  • Insurance Defense
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Other 8
    • Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith
    • Patent, Trademark and Copyright Infringement
    • Probate, Estates and Trust Litigation
    • Trade Secrets - DTSA
    • Employment Law
    • Product Liability and Catastrophic Injury Litigation
    • Mediation for Complex Business and IP Cases
    • Court Appointed Special Master for Complex Cases

Practice Details

  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder/Director
    Firm Name
    Henry Sneath - Partner at Houston Harbaugh, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Louisiana Manufacturing Company (Patentee) v. Pittsburgh Manufacturing Company of Industrial Products – Federal Court (Party names
    case location redacted due to confidentiality agreement) Successfully defended Pittsburgh Manufacturer in lengthy
    complex patent infringement litigation including a counterclaim for patent invalidity
    various business torts.University of Pittsburgh v. [Redacted due to confidentiality] Medical Systems, Inc. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented Defendant, a Silicon Valley manufacturer of large medical radiation delivery devices, as lead trial counsel for several years against claims of patent infringement
    in support of claims of patent invalidity
    tried three one week, “single issue” jury trials in four months in front of the same Judge
    Jury. Following Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the matter was confidentially settled. It was one of the largest patent cases ever tried in the USDC for the WDPA (Pittsburgh).CNX Gas Corporation v. CDX Gas LLC – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Defended gas exploration company CDX against declaratory judgment claims that sought to invalidate their patents
    brought counterclaims of patent infringement against Plaintiff CNX. After claim construction
    just prior to trial, the parties reached an amicable settlement wherein, inter alia, Plaintiff acknowledged the validity of the subject patents. Additional settlement terms are confidential.Sherwin Williams v. PPG Industries – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Presided over much of this complex Patent Infringement lawsuit as Federal Court appointed Special Master to make Reports
    Recommendations to the court on important issues relating to infringement, validity, summary judgment, jury instructions, voir dire
    other discovery, pre-trial
    trial issues.Rice Drilling B, LLC (Rice Energy LP Now EQT) v. International Assets Advisory, LLC et al. – State Court (Washington County, Pa.) Represented Rice in filing
    prosecuting declaratory judgment action against various financial brokers relating to high level venture funding of Rice
    claims brought against client for large brokerage fees
    other damages.Prominent GmbH et al. v. Prominent Systems, Inc. et al. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Successfully represented Defendant Prominent Systems in a trademark infringement
    unfair competition action brought by Prominent GmbH,
    achieved summary judgment
    complete dismissal of the case in favor of client after protracted litigation.Cutsforth, Inc. v. Lemm Liquidating Company, LLC et al. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Served as Local Co-Counsel with large national patent law firm in representing Plaintiff in this patent infringement lawsuit. Case was settled after lengthy litigation.MHF Logistical Solutions, Inc. v. ICE Services Group, Inc. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented Defendant against claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with business relations, breach of contract
    equitable injunctive relief. After brief litigation, assisted the parties in reaching an amicable business settlement with no payment of money by client to plaintiff.Modular International, Inc. v. RSA Lighting LLC
    Cooper Lighting, Inc. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented Plaintiff in bringing patent infringement claims against defendants. After substantial litigation, but prior to claim construction, the parties reached an amicable settlement including a royalty payment to client by defendant.Evans v. Callister Strategic Communications, LLC – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented Defendant in defense of this copyright infringement action which was successfully resolved.Haynes International, Inc. v. Special Metals Corporation – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented Defendant against claims of trademark infringement
    other Lanham Act claims. Prior to trial, the parties reached an amicable settlement, the terms of which are confidential.Voice Signal Technologies v. Nuance Communications, Inc. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented Plaintiff in bringing claims of patent infringement. The lawsuit was settled when the defendant corporation acquired the plaintiff corporation
    effectuated a business settlement of the litigation.German Manufacturer v. American Seller of Commercial Light Fixtures (names protected) – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Defended American seller of sophisticated commercial light fixtures against claims of copyright, trademark
    trade dress infringement. Defense was based on lack of confusion in the relevant marketplace
    on theory that Plaintiff’s copyrights were invalid. A non-monetary business settlement was reached quickly after these defenses were raised
    pled.Import/Export Company v. National Department Stores (names protected) – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Defended a Fortune 500 company against claims of copyright
    trademark infringement, trademark dilution, Lanham Act violations
    unfair trade practices, by asserting ownership rights to design drawings
    3-dimensional novelty gift items which were manufactured in Asia
    purchased by our client for resale in the United States. Following extensive discovery
    our filing of a Motion for Summary Judgment, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed all claims.Mitel Corporation
    Mitel, Inc. v. Hope Telecom, Inc. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Successfully defended
    settled claims for damages
    injunctive relief brought by designer
    manufacturer of networked communications systems
    related software against defendant which was alleged to have modified
    sold the protected hardware
    software. The copyright
    trademark claims were brought pursuant to federal statute
    common law
    plaintiff brought claims pursuant to the Federal Trademark Dilution Act
    claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. A complex settlement involving some injunctive relief was obtained with help of mediation provided through the federal courts.Tivi BV . v. U.S. Tech.
    Sportstech – Federal District Court (Seattle, Wa.)
    Hong Kong – Represented plaintiff, a Dutch Corporation, which owned the exclusive rights
    license to the “total image” of one of the world’s foremost tennis superstars. Brought claims against defendant for breach of endorsement contracts, unjust enrichment,
    various other business torts. This complex commercial case involved international tax
    licensing issues,
    issues related to a piercing of the defendant’s corporate veil. Obtained favorable settlement on behalf of plaintiff with payment of proceeds coming in part, from principals of defendant corporation.American Atlas Corporation v. Allegheny County Industrial Development Authority – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Obtained summary judgment on behalf of defendant in multi-million dollar breach of contract
    tort action. Plaintiff alleged that it was the successful low bidder on a large environmental remediation
    construction project
    brought claims against the defendant alleging a failure to award the bid to the lowest responsible bidder. Plaintiff sought $26 million in compensatory damages
    asked for punitive damages. On our motion, summary judgment was obtained on behalf of the defendant
    the District Court’s ruling was upheld by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals
    certiorari petition to the United States Supreme Court was denied. H
    led the prosecution of the underlying claims
    all appellate claims arising therefrom.Robert B. Witt v. Allegheny Power Systems, Sprint PCS
    Bechtel Group, Inc. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented defendants in equity action, wherein plaintiff sought both emergency
    permanent injunctive relief against defendants for alleged violations of a right-of-way agreement that ran over
    across the l
    owned by the plaintiff. Defendant power company had an easement over plaintiff’s property
    following brief, but intensive litigation, a creative
    low cost settlement was obtained which allowed telecommunications equipment
    antennae to be added on to an existing power company transmission line tower.Corporation Information Systems, Inc. t/d/b/a Ciscorp v. Timothy Pribanic – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented plaintiff in prosecuting claims against defendant for breach of contract including claims for violation of restrictive covenants, non-compete agreements
    failure to return privileged
    confidential information
    documents. Claims were brought at law
    in equity. Obtained injunctive
    declaratory relief,
    a favorable financial settlement on behalf of client.Louis Coccoli, et al. v. Allegheny County Airport Authority – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Defended three lawsuits filed against large municipal authority, which lawsuits challenged the legality
    formation of the defendant Authority
    sought emergency
    permanent injunctive relief. After filing motions to dismiss
    supportive briefs, all claims against our client were withdrawn/dismissed.Bizmart, Inc. v. Facility Construction Management (FCMI), Inc. v. Towlift, Inc. Defended FCMI against breach of contract
    breach of warranty complaint for alleged faulty concrete construction in the pouring
    leveling of a super-flat floor in a large, high tech warehouse operation.Represented Amazon Store Sellers in defending claims of unfair competition, patent infringement, trademark infringement
    counterfeiting in Federal District Court.Leach v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Obtained defense verdict for Northwestern Mutual after ten day jury trial on plaintiff’s claims for in excess of $1 million long term disability benefits with summary judgment having already been granted dismissing plaintiff’s claim of insurer bad faith. Also obtained jury verdict against plaintiff on client insurer’s counterclaim for breach of contract, fraud
    unjust enrichment. Attorneys’ fees were awarded to client for total counterclaim award against plaintiff of over $525,000. Verdict was upheld on appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. H
    led both trial
    appeal.American Insurance Company v. Brokerage Firm et. al. v. National Insurance Company (names protected) – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Successfully represented plaintiff insurance company in declaratory judgment action against named insured brokerage firms, numerous individual brokers
    National Insurance Co., seeking declaration of no coverage for claims submitted by the brokers due to lawsuits filed by National Insurance Co. against the brokers for breach of contract
    violation of non-compete
    brokerage agreements.Jones v. ABC National Insurance Co. (names protected by confidentiality agreement) – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff, an employee of a large insured corporation, brought claims of bad faith against his employer’s insurer. He sought recovery of punitive damages
    counsel fees citing the failure of the insurer to make any settlement offer prior to uninsured motorist arbitration as evidence of bad faith under Pennsylvania law. The arbitration had resulted in a policy limits ($500,000) award to plaintiff. Utilizing ERISA
    other federal law preemption defenses, we successfully defended a near certain liability case
    achieved a very modest settlement.Ray v. Armstrong Developers, et al. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff brought premises liability claims for alleged brain injury she sustained when she collided with large glass wall on commercial premises. Obtained defense jury verdict following trial on behalf of defendant.American States Insurance, et al. v. Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Association, et al. – Armstrong County (Kittanning, Pa.) Obtained summary judgment on behalf of defendant Association in this declaratory judgment action wherein plaintiff excess insurance company claimed that defendants breached their duty to defend an underlying insured,
    failed to make indemnity payments to that insured. Claims were brought in breach of contract
    bad faith. The decision was upheld on appeal.Norma Vaglio-Lauren v. Pioneer Hose Co. No. 1 of Brackenridge Borough – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Obtained summary judgment in two wrongful death
    survival actions which brought dram shop
    other tort claims against volunteer fire company which owned
    operated a social club serving alcohol. Successfully applied Pennsylvania law granting immunity to volunteer fire companies
    obtained summary judgment on behalf of all defendants.Blake v. George P. Bohach, Esquire,
    Law Offices of Delamater, Haag & Bohach – Hancock County (Wheeling) Defended claims of professional (legal) malpractice brought by plaintiff pursuant to an alleged failure of defendants to file a lawsuit prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. Obtained a relatively modest settlement in a near-certain liability action in the panh
    le area, which is known for large jury verdicts.Industrial Risk Insurers as Subrogee for Neville Chemical Co. v. Minnotte Contracting Corp. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented plaintiff in subrogation action following the explosion of a large industrial facility
    their payment on the property damage claims. Obtained substantial settlement on behalf of plaintiff insurer prior to trial.Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Robert L. Snyder
    Jessie M. Snyder
    AHRS Coal Corp. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Resources – Environmental Hearing Board (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented insurance company as issuer of environmental remediation bonds. Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Resources had forfeited numerous bonds pursuant to the coal mine operators’ failure to properly remediate
    reclaim strip-mining areas in Western Pennsylvania. On behalf of the insurance company, successfully overturned a majority of the forfeitures, saving the insurance company large sums of money that would otherwise have been paid on these forfeited bonds. Complex case involved 10 years of litigation before the Environmental Hearing Board
    various Pennsylvania trial level
    appellate courts.Smith v. ABC Accounting Firm – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) – (actual names protected by confidentiality agreement) Defended professional negligence
    breach of contract claims brought against regional accounting firm. Obtained complete withdrawal/dismissal of all claims just prior to trial.Rodgers v. Jones, M.D. Crawford County – (Meadville, Pa.) (actual names protected) Defended medical negligence
    lack of informed consent claims against plastic surgeon at trial
    obtained defense verdict on behalf of client after jury trial.ABC Corporation v. National Insurer (Names protected) – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented an insured corporation in seeking reversal of denial of coverage
    defense by defendant’s insurer following submission of claims by defendant for advertising injury coverage. Our client was sued for trademark
    copyright infringement
    Lanham Act claims,
    our client’s insurer denied both defense
    indemnity, citing exclusions to the advertising injury insuring provisions. We brought claims against the insurer seeking defense
    indemnification in the underlying lawsuit
    were successful in overturning the insurer’s initial denial of both defense
    indemnity.Wolf v. Bankers Life
    Casualty Co. – State Court (Lancaster, Pa.) Defended Bankers Life against claims of breach of contract, insurance bad faith
    unfair trade practices. Following a bench trial, the judge awarded plaintiff $1.4 million. During the course of our appeal from the adverse verdict
    award, the matter was settled on terms far more favorable than the verdict to my client.Sciotto v. Lamar Life Insurance Company Delaware County State Court (Media, Pa.) Obtained defense verdict in bench trial on behalf of defendant excess insurer. Plaintiff, a high level quadriplegic had obtained a large personal injury settlement in an underlying action
    then sought to compel the client excess insurer to drop down into a primary insurer role
    pay to plaintiff amounts that plaintiff had lost from the settlement due to a large insurer subrogation claim. With no Pennsylvania case law on point, the case was tried to a defense verdict in favor of client.Beck v. Lomas Mortgage USA, et al. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff brought breach of contract
    bad faith claims pursuant to a mortgage life insurance policy sold to plaintiff’s decedent. Obtained summary judgment on behalf of all defendants.National Fidelity Life Insurance Co. v. Equibank, Merrill Lynch, Manhattan Life Insurance
    Max Gomberg – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented plaintiff life insurance company in complex commercial litigation prosecuting claims for fraud, embezzlement, breach of contract
    banking related claims involving fraudulent endorsement issues. Obtained large settlement on behalf of plaintiff against the defendants.Jones v. ABC Life Assurance Company (names protected) – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Represented defendant life insurance company in civil suit brought by plaintiff alleging wrongful denial of life insurance benefits. Defense was based on alleged misrepresentations by plaintiff’s decedent in medical section of life insurance application. Favorable settlement obtained after deposition of plaintiff wherein proof of misrepresentations was obtained. Issue of materiality would have remained for trial, but settlement was obtained prior to trial.XYZ Life
    Casualty Company v. Smith (names protected) – Federal District Court (Erie, Pa.) Represented plaintiff life insurance company in prosecuting claims against numerous agents for breach of agency agreement provisions relating to non-competition
    non-disclosure of proprietary, confidential information. Obtained cash settlement from defendants
    extension of restrictive covenants for time period commensurate with duration of violations. Extension of restrictive covenant time periods entered as court order by district court along with liquidated damages provision in the event of future violations.Galloway v. Beckwith Machinery
    Caterpillar, Inc. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Successfully defended Beckwith Machinery through jury trial against strict products liability claims brought by plaintiff. Plaintiff claimed serious brain injury resulting from an alleged design
    manufacturing defect in a forklift truck, which had been modified
    sold by defendant Beckwith. Plaintiff dem
    ed $7,000,000 for settlement. Jury returned a defense verdict.Gallo v. General Motors Corp. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff claimed unwanted, sudden acceleration of the subject vehicle causing personal injury
    property damage. Successfully defended case for General Motors on behalf of client
    obtained defense verdict after jury trial.Bayani v. Connors Footwear, Inc. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff claimed serious orthopedic injury (trimalleolar fracture of ankle) due to defectively designed clog shoe which allegedly collapsed while she was walking down steps. Obtained defense verdict on behalf of client manufacturer after jury trial.Kaczor v. Icon Health
    Fitness, Inc. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Successfully defended manufacturer of exercise treadmill against claims that an electrical malfunction caused a fire
    extensive property damage. Defense verdict obtained on behalf of client at jury trial after prevailing on Daubert motion ruled upon during trial, to strike one of plaintiff’s liability experts.Laughery v. Komline-S
    erson Engineering Corp.
    Perry Machinery Corp. – ­Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff claimed serious bodily injury when his arm was crushed in a large industrial water filtration device. Plaintiff brought strict products liability
    negligence claims involving an alleged failure to properly guard the subject machine. Case settled prior to jury selection.White v. Manufacturer, Inc.
    Equipment, Inc. (actual names protected) – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff, an airplane pilot, claimed total disability from injuries sustained in an alleged collapse of a home exercise weight-lifting unit. Favorable settlement obtained after successful discovery on damage
    medical causation issues.Pfab v. Fruehauf Trailers, Inc.
    Monsanto, Inc. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff claimed injury from an alleged product defect in the crank gears used to raise
    lower the trailer when disengaged from the tractor. “Nominal” settlement obtained on behalf of defendant Fruehauf.Scherer v. Bitting Recreation, Inc.
    Gametime, Inc. – Washington County (Washington, Pa.) Minor plaintiff brought personal injury claims of product liability against manufacturer of swing set chains
    S-hooks. Obtained defense verdict on behalf of designer
    manufacturer after jury trial.Webb v. Suzuki Motor Corporation – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff claimed massive injuries as a result of alleged vehicle rollover. Case settled prior to jury selection.Smith v. DeMaco Machine Corporation
    Maldari & Sons, Inc. – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Successfully defended product liability claims against the defendants wherein plaintiff alleged amputation of part of his foot pursuant to an alleged defect in pasta making equipment. Obtained a “nominal” settlement on behalf of defendant DeMaco just prior to the selection of a jury.Reha v. K.S. Wholesalers of America, Inc., Toyotomi USA, Inc.
    Kero-sun, Inc. – Greene County (Waynesburg, Pa.) Defended Japanese manufacturer
    American supplier of kerosene heaters. Plaintiffs brought bodily injury
    property damage claims arising out of a fire which burned
    injured various members of two families living in a duplex house in rural Greene County . Plaintiffs alleged product defect in design
    manufacture,
    negligence in failure to warn. Obtained defense verdict on behalf of all defendants following jury trial.Saunders v. Coburn Optical Industries, Inc., Sola Optical USA, Inc.
    Pilkington Vision Care, Inc. – Federal District Court (Erie, Pa.) Obtained summary judgment on behalf of all defendants on claims brought by plaintiff of design
    manufacturing defect in eyeglasses which shattered when plaintiff was assaulted by a psychiatric patient at a mental hospital. Plaintiff lost vision in one eye completely,
    partially lost vision in the other eye. Plaintiff sought millions of dollars in damages. Summary judgment granted pursuant to our motion.Beronilla v. Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corporation USA – Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff brought strict product liability claims of design
    manufacturing defect
    claims of negligence seeking damages for personal injuries sustained in a motorcycle crash. Obtained summary judgment on behalf of defendant Kawasaki after filing of motion prior to trial.Pacek v. County of Allegheny, et al. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) ­Plaintiff brought constitutional civil rights claims alleging false arrest, false imprisonment,
    malicious prosecution. Plaintiff had been convicted by a jury in 1958 on charges of rape
    murder, but claimed that he was framed. Plaintiff was pardoned by the Governor in 1991, which triggered a two-year statute of limitations period,
    allowed the filing of the lawsuit. Obtained summary judgment for defendants on all claims in this newsworthy case with novel
    complex legal issues. The underlying facts of the case are chronicled in the book Fall Guys – False Confessions
    the Politics of Murder (Author Jim Fisher
    published by Southern Illinois University Press – 1996).Day v. County of Allegheny, et al. – Federal Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff brought civil rights claims alleging false arrest, false imprisonment
    other 1983 claims under the United States Constitution
    various claims under state law. Obtained defense verdict on behalf of all defendants after lengthy jury trial.Barnhart v. Allegheny County Prison Board, et al. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff brought constitutional civil rights claims against municipal
    individual defendants alleging a policy, practice, procedure
    custom of brutality by corrections officers at the Allegheny County Jail. Obtained a defense verdict on behalf of all defendants following a jury trial.McDonald v. National Restaurant Chain (names protected by confidentiality agreement). – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Plaintiff brought claims of sexual harassment
    violations of civil rights. Obtained dismissal of all claims on behalf of defendant
    against plaintiff.Beatty v. County of Allegheny, et al. – Federal District Court (Pittsburgh, Pa.) ­Obtained dismissal of plaintiff’s claims on behalf of all defendants following the filing of various motions for sanctions for failure of plaintiff to respond to discovery
    /or to prosecute the action. Plaintiff, a municipal police chief, brought constitutional civil rights claims against county
    individual defendants alleging false arrest
    malicious prosecution as a result of charges brought against him by the county district attorney.
  • Pro Bono Services

    I have represented battered and abused women in Protection from Abuse Hearings and trials

  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1984, Pennsylvania
    1984, U.S. District Court, Western, Middle and Eastern Districts of Pennsylvania
    U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
    U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Memberships

    Member American Bar Association (Intellectual Property, Business Law, and Tort/Insurance Practice Sections)
    Member Pennsylvania Bar Association (Civil Litigation Section)
    Past Chair, Intellectual Property Section Pennsylvania Bar Association
    Member Allegheny County Bar Association (Civil Litigation, Construction Law, and Federal Court Sections)
    Member Pittsburgh Intellectual Property Law Association
    Member American Intellectual Property Law Association
    Past President and National Member Board of Directors Defense Research Institute
    Member Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Committees Defense Research Institute
    Member Business Litigation Committee International Association of Defense Counsel
    Member The Federalist Society, Pittsburgh Lawyers Division
    Member Lawyers for Civil Justice
    Member Federal Bar Association
    Member American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)
    Member American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)
    Member International Trademark Association (INTA).

    Bar Fellowship
    Academy of Trial Lawyers of Allegheny County.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Duquesne University School of Law
    Class of 1983
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Hamilton College
    Class of 1980
    B.A.
    Economics and English

    Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School - Complex Mediation
    Class of 2021
    Certificate
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Complex Case Mediator, Arbitrator and Federal Court Special Master

Activity

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Henry M. M. Sneath has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Henry M. M. Sneath attended Duquesne University School of Law.