Dingess, Foster, Luciana, Davidson & Chleboski LLPPartner

Brian R. Davidson

About Brian R. Davidson

Brian R. Davidson is a lawyer practicing construction litigation, epc contracts, construction contract drafting and 6 other areas of law. Brian received a B.S. degree from Carnegie Mellon University in 1989, and has been licensed for 31 years. Brian practices at Dingess, Foster, Luciana, Davidson & Chleboski LLP in Pittsburgh, PA.

Awards

Reviews for Brian

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Other 6
    • EPC Contracts
    • Construction Contract Drafting
    • Negotiating and Counseling
    • International Arbitration
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Commercial

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Dingess, Foster, Luciana, Davidson & Chleboski LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Engagements: Lead trial counsel for a joint venture design-build contractor arising out of the design
    construction of a 57-foot bored tunnel in downtown Seattle, Washington.
    Lead trial counsel for a multinational engineering
    construction company in connection with disputes arising out of a Propane Dehydrogenation
    Polypropylene Upgrading Facility project in Alberta, Canada. The disputes are subject to a pending ICC arbitration before a three-member arbitration panel.
    Lead trial counsel for a general contractor in connection with disputes arising out of the construction of new high school complex. The matter is pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
    Lead trial counsel for the owner of an industrial complex in connection with disputes arising out of the design, construction
    failure of components of the complex. The matter was resolved satisfactorily to the owner.
    Lead trial counsel for a multinational engineering
    construction company in connection with disputes arising out of a module fabrication
    assembly project for an oil s
    s hydrogen project in Alberta, Canada. The disputes were subject to an Ad Hoc arbitration conducted pursuant to the Alberta Arbitration Act before a three member arbitration panel.
    Lead counsel for a multinational engineering
    construction company regarding the design, procurement, construction
    installation of a flue gas desulfurization system (scrubbers) at a coal-fired power plant in Texas with a contract value of approximately $193 million. Represented the contractor in disputes with the owner with respect to the contractor's claims for delays, additional work
    unpaid invoices,
    the owner's claims for defective work
    liquidated damages. The disputes were subject to litigation in the courts of Texas. The matter was resolved favorable for the contractor prior to the commencement of litigation.
    Lead counsel for the owner of a coal-fired power plant in connection with ongoing disputes
    claims with the contractor
    designer arising out of the design, engineering, procurement, construction, supply, installation
    start-up of a flue gas desulfurization system.
    Lead counsel for a multi-national engineering
    construction company in connection with disputes arising out of the design, fabrication, supply, installation
    start-up of a super-critical steam generator for use in a 750 MW, coal-fired power generation unit. The disputes, which were subject to arbitration pursuant to the American Arbitration Association Rules, were resolved prior to hearings through a series of settlement agreements.
    Lead counsel for a subcontractor in connection with disputes with the EPC Contractor arising out of the construction of The Panama Canal - Third Set of Locks Project. The matter, which was subject to ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976), was settled favorably to the subcontractor prior to the commencement of arbitration.
    Lead counsel for a multinational engineering
    construction company regarding an offshore oil & gas project dispute with respect to subsea flow line issues. The dispute was subject to ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976) before a three member international arbitration panel.
    Lead counsel for one of the world's largest multinational engineering
    construction companies in connection with disputes arising out of a lump-sum, turnkey contract for the engineering, procurement, fabrication, transportation
    construction of a $1.7 billion gas to liquids facility in Nigeria. Assisted the EPC Contractor in identifying, developing
    evaluating delay
    extra work claims against the project owner with an aggregate value in excess of $200 million. The claims were subject to arbitration administered by the London Court of International Arbitration under the UNCITRAL arbitration rules. However, these disputes were resolved amicably prior to the commencement of arbitration proceedings.
    Counsel for one of the world's largest multinational engineering
    construction companies with respect to over $1 billion in total claims on a single mega-project. The dispute centered on one of the world's largest offshore oil
    gas projects with an initial contract price of over $2.5 billion. The adversary was the national oil company of Brazil. Responsible for the development
    management of various aspects of this matter. The engagement spanned a period of five years (2001-06)
    required extensive worldwide travel, including travel to South America
    Europe. While all disputes were subject to ultimate resolution under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976), all disputes, with the exception of one, were resolved through a series of settlements without the necessity of formal arbitration proceedings. The settled disputes involved issues concerning engineering
    construction changes an delays, claims of cardinal change, liquidated damages for delay, schedule analysis
    claims of time
    money entitlement, international letters of credit, value added tax (VAT) claims, force majeure claims
    project finance issues in connection with a worldwide syndicate of commercial
    national banks. Mr. Davidson is co-lead arbitration counsel for the remaining unresolved dispute with a value in excess of $100 million.
    Counsel to the consortium of international engineering
    construction companies acting as the EPC contractor for the design, construction
    start-up of an US$800 million chemical complex located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The complex consists of a 520,000 MTA light feedstock steam cracker facility for the production of polymer grade ethylene, integrated with a 540,000 MTA high density
    linear low density polyethylene swing plant, with two single gas reactor Gas-Phase lines. Mr. Davidson assisted the consortium in identifying, evaluating
    presenting claims against the project owner
    evaluating the owner's counterclaims. All disputes are subject to arbitration in New York, New York under the American Arbitration Association's Construction Industry Rules
    Procedures for International commercial Arbitration.
    Lead Counsel for subcontractor in an ICC arbitration arising out of the design, supply, installation, commissioning, check-out
    testing of a two st
    reversing mill
    equalizing furnace for a flat roll products mini mill in Ostrava, Czech Republic. The subcontractor asserted claims in the aggregate amount of approximately $20 million for unpaid invoices, additional work,
    value added tax. In addition, the contractor asserted counterclaims in the amount of approximately $12 million. Following the hearings conducted in Vienna, Austria, the arbitration panel rendered an award favorable to the subcontractor.
    Counsel for EPC Contractor in a series of ICC, AAA
    UNCITRAL arbitrations
    federal court proceedings arising out of the engineering, procurement,
    construction of $300 million mini strip mill in Samutprakarn, Thail
    . Several months into the project, the owner suspended
    eventually terminated the project as a result of its financial difficulties. Mr. Davidson represented the EPC Contractor as the claimant in an UNCITRAL arbitration against the project owner involving claims for damages arising out of the termination in the approximate amount of $50 million. Mr. Davidson also represented the EPC Contractor in the defense of claims asserted in numerous forums by various subcontractors arising out of the owner's termination of the project.
    Other recent engagements on behalf of international engineering
    construction firms include: Insurance coverage action in Louisiana arising out of damage to an LNG regasification terminal caused by Hurricane Ike
    Counsel for contractor in drafting
    negotiating EPC Contract for the engineering, procurement, construction, pre-commissioning, commissioning, start-up
    testing of a multi-billion dollar LNG Liquefaction Project in Mozambique, Africa.
    Counsel for contractor in drafting
    negotiating EPC Contract for the engineering, procurement, construction, pre-commissioning, commissioning, start-up
    testing of a multi-billion dollar LNG Liquefaction Project in British Columbia, Canada.
    Counsel for contractor in drafting
    negotiating various contracts in connection with an early works project for a grassroots petrochemical facility in Monaca, Pennsylvania.
    Lead counsel for a multi-state professional services firm in connection with insurance coverage disputes arising out of legal malpractice claims. The claims, which were subject to litigation in Pennsylvania state court, were settled prior to trial.
    Insurance coverage action in United States Federal District Court in New York, New York arising out of a lump-sum, turnkey EPC Contract for a water injection
    drilling facilities platform in the Norwegian Continental Shelf.
    Disputes arising out of the design of a $1 billion semi-submersible platform in the Gulf of Mexico.
    Disputes arising out of the engineering, procurement, transportation, construction, commissioning
    testing of a $2 billion LNG facility in Papua, Indonesia.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1995, Pennsylvania
    1995, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    United States Court of Appeals for the Third and Fifth Circuits
    United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
    United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Pro Hac Vice admission to state and federal courts throughout the United States
    1995, Pennsylvania
    Memberships

    Professional / Civic Activities

    •International Bar Association (Arbitration, International Construction Projects and Law Firm Management Committees)
    •American Bar Association, Construction Law Section
    •Allegheny County Bar Association, Construction Law Section, Vice-Chair (2012-2013) Chair-Elect (2013-2014)
    •Pennsylvania State Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Pittsburgh School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    summa cum laude

    University of Pittsburgh School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    1994 Managing Editor University of Pittsburgh Law Review

    University of Pittsburgh School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    Order of the Coif
    Other Education
    Carnegie Mellon University
    Class of 1989
    B.S.
    Industrial Management
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: