×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.Member
Scott A. Malm
Pro

Scott A. Malm

4.6
6 reviews

One E. Washington Street, Suite 1600, Phoenix, AZ 85004-2553

Title Insurance and Escrow, Real Estate Litigation, Commercial Disputes and 1 more

About Scott A. Malm

Scott Malm concentrates his practice on litigation and dispute resolution for businesses and individuals. He primarily advises and represents title insurance companies and their insureds, escrow agents, lenders, developers, brokers, contractors, and similar clients in trial and appellate courts at the state and federal level.

Scott is recognized in Real Estate Law by Best Lawyers in America , is rated AV-Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell, representing the highest rating in legal ability and ethical standards, and has been recognized in the Southwest Super Lawyers list for Real Estate Law.

Scott has handled numerous mediations as a Judge Pro Tem for Maricopa County Superior Courts. He is also available as a mediator and arbitrator for real estate, title, escrow, and business disputes.

Professional Recognition

• The Best Lawyers in America, Litigation - Real Estate; Real Estate Law (2020-2026)

• Southwest Super Lawyers, Real Estate Law (2012-2013 and 2025)

• Phoenix Magazine 2022 Top Lawyers - Arbitration and Mediation; Real Estate

• Featured “Innovator” in the Phoenix Business Journal (August 2009)

Presentations & Publications

•Arizona State Bar, Real Property and Construction Law Sections (2011-present)
•Land Title Assoc. of Arizona and Arizona State Escrow Assoc. Conferences (2008-present)
•National Business Inst.: Boundary Law and Real Estate Titles (2002-present)
•National CLE Conference, Law Education Institute: Title Insurance (2007 and 2009)
•Author, Arizona Journal of Real Estate and Business: “Abstractor Liability” (2004)
•Arizona Trustee Association: Equitable Subrogation (2002 and 2012)
•Panelist, “Arizona’s Homestead and Judgment Lien Law Amendments,” State Bar Convention (2022)

Community Involvement

•Youth Sports Head Coach, including multiple Coach of the Year awards (2007-present)
•Gilbert Christian Schools (former president and board member, 2009-2014)
•Electronic Recording Commission (appointed by Governor, 2006-2007)
•Arizona Town Hall (report chairman, panel chairman, panel recorder, 2000-2009)
•Chandler-Horizon Rotary Club (former president and board member, 1998-2008)
•Actors Theatre of Phoenix (former executive committee and board member, 1998-2001)

 

Scott A. Malm (Phoenix, Arizona) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Scott A. Malm got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Scott A. Malm

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.6
See All Reviews
6
4.5
Lawyers.com
1
4.6
Martindale
5
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
100%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
4.0
Value for Money
4.0
Real Estate
Posted by anonymous
March 12, 2020
Hired Attorney Scott A. Malm

Mr. Malm was highly recommended to me for his expertise in real estate legal knowledge from a title clerk I was working with in Phoenix. She saw I had signed some legal papers without going through a title company, therefore, I did not get title insurance and I was about to lose $480,000 cash. I had been taken advantage of by a scam artist and was about to lose my life savings. She said she has seen Mr. Malm in action and if anyone could help me it would be him. I contacted him and he spoke freely and openly to me about the trouble I was in. He told me EXACTLY what I would need in order to win a lawsuit to capture the $480,000 I was about to lose. He didn't try to push me in to see him without giving me any advice. I was able to get the required paperwork and I got the $480,000 I was owed within three weeks. Thank you Very Much Mr. Malm for helping me with the law and your time.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Other 3
    • Title Insurance and Escrow
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Commercial Disputes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Maricopa County v. Rovey, 250 Ariz. 419 (App. 2020) (roadways
    easements)
    Pac. W. Bank v. Castleton, 246 Ariz. 108 (App. 2018) (judgment liens
    homestead)
    Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Pheasant Grove LLC, 245 Ariz. 325 (App. 2018) (deed reformation)
    Markham Contracting Co., Inc. v. FDIC, 240 Ariz. 361 (App. 2016) (equitable subrogation)
    Lewis v. Debord, 238 Ariz. 28 (2015) (recorded judgment lien)
    Manicom v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 236 Ariz. 153 (App. 2014) (lien priority)
    Weitz Co LLC v. Heth, 235 Ariz. 405 (Ariz. 2014) (equitable subrogation)
    Brimet II, LLC v. Destiny Homes Marketing, LLC, 231 Ariz. 457 (App. 2013) (equitable subrogation)
    Wang Elec. v. Smoke Tree, 230 Ariz. 314 (App. 2012) (unjust enrichment)
    Sourcecorp v. Norcutt, 229 Ariz. 270 (2012) (equitable subrogation)
    In re Vasquez, 228 Ariz. 357 (2011) (trustee's sale procedures)
    Cont. Light. & Contr., Inc. v. Premier, et al., 227 Ariz. 382 (App. 2011) (equitable subrogation)
    Cypress on Sunl
    HOA, et al. v. Orl
    ini II, 227 Ariz. 288 (App. 2011) (HOA liens)
    In re Mortgages Ltd., 444 B.R. 585 (Bktcy.D.Ariz. 2011) (equitable subrogation)
    Birdsell v. Bella Funding, 430 B.R. 544 (Bktcy.D.Ariz. 2010) (deed of trust validity)
    In re Estate of Parker, 217 Ariz. 563 (App. 2008) (real estate succession affidavit)
    Maxfield v. Martin, 217 Ariz. 312 (App. 2007) (identity theft/escrow liability)
    Bunyard v. U.S. Dept. of Ag., 301 F. Supp.2d 1052 (D. Ariz. 2004) (adverse possession)
    Speros v. Yu, 207 Ariz. 153 (App. 2004) (rights of way ab
    onment)
    Mealey v. Arndt, 206 Ariz. 218 (App. 2003) (boundary by acquiescence)
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gustlaw.com/attorneys/scott-a-malm/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1997, Arizona
    and 1998, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
    1997, U.S. District Court, Arizona
    Memberships

    Professional Associations

    •State Bar of Arizona
    •Real Estate Law Advisory Commission (2005-2008)
    •Judge Pro Tempore, Maricopa County Superior Courts (2005-current)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Arizona
    Class of 1997
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Arizona
    Class of 1991
    B.A.
    cum laude and honors program

    University of Wales, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff, United Kingdom
    Class of 1993
    M.B.A.

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Email Scott A. Malm

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Scott A. Malm was admitted in 1997 to the State of Arizona.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Scott A. Malm has a 4.6 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. has 60 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Scott A. Malm attended University of Arizona.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. was established in 1921.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions