×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.Associate
no photo

Mr Derek Conor Flint

Not yet reviewed

One East Washington Street, Suite 2700, Phoenix, AZ 85004

Election Law, Export Controls, Economic Sanctions, Foreign Anti-Corruption, and Imports, Investigations, Government Enforcement and White Collar Protection and 6 more

About Mr Derek Conor Flint

Mr Derek Conor Flint is a lawyer practicing election law, export controls, economic sanctions, foreign anti-corruption, and imports, investigations, government enforcement and white collar protection and 6 other areas of law. Derek received a degree from Associate Editor, Arizona State Law Journal, and has been licensed for 8 years. Derek practices at Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. in Phoenix, AZ.

 

Mr Derek Conor Flint (Phoenix, Arizona)

Reviews for Derek

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 9
    • Election Law
    • Export Controls, Economic Sanctions, Foreign Anti-Corruption, and Imports
    • Investigations, Government Enforcement and White Collar Protection
    • Special Litigation and Compliance
    • Appeals and Critical Motions
    • Government Contracting and Procurement
    • Healthcare
    • Constitutional and Political Litigation
    • False Claims Act

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish (Limited Working Proficiency)
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Experience: Represented clients in bid protest proceedings across the United States
    Represented clients in obtaining
    defending against preliminary injunctions
    temporary restraining orders
    Represented healthcare providers
    health insurance companies in commercial disputes, including litigation, arbitration,
    overpayment requests
    Represented multiple c
    idates
    political parties in regard to constitutional
    election challenges in state
    federal courts
    Advised clients regarding export licenses
    Advised clients regarding Technical Assistance Agreements
    Analyzed whether products comply with the Berry Amendment
    the Buy American Act
    Advised cryptocurrency companies regarding compliance with The Office of Foreign Assets Control,
    Anti-Money-Laundering regulations
    Assisted clients in mitigating
    eliminating fines
    seizures from U.S. Customs
    Border Protection
    Advised clients on classification of goods for purposes of determining tariff rates
    Conducted internal investigation for company regarding civil
    criminal False Claims Act allegations

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2018, Arizona
    2018, Supreme Court of Arizona
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    United States Court of International Trade
    United States District Court, District of Arizona
    United States Supreme Court
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
    United States Court of Federal Claims
    Memberships

    Professional Memberships and Activities

    •Republican National Lawyers Association, Arizona Chair (2022-2023)
    •Phoenix Committee on Foreign Relations (2018-Present)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Arizona State University, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
    Class of 2017
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Associate Editor, Arizona State Law Journal

    CALI Excellence for the Future Award: Legal Method & Writing
    2014
    Criminal Procedure

    Chair of Hosted Competitions, ASU Executive Moot Court Board

    Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot

    University of British Columbia
    Class of 2014
    B.A.
    International Relations

    President's Entrance Scholarship

    President and VP External, Right to Play UBC

Email Mr Derek Conor Flint

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions